From the article:
Senator John Edwards, the Democratic vice-presidential candidate, said yesterday: "After months of listening to the Republicans base their campaign on their singular ability to win the war on terror, the president now says we can't win the war on terrorism."
To: arkady_renko
Democrats are too stupid to realize that terrorism is going to be with us until the end of time; the only way to "win" is to keep fighting.
That being said, I'd love to hear their "plan" to win the war on terrorism.
2 posted on
08/31/2004 11:01:16 AM PDT by
Howlin
(John Kerry & John Edwards: Political Malpractice)
So Kerry isn't the only one who flip-flops?
3 posted on
08/31/2004 11:08:13 AM PDT by
adamk
To: arkady_renko
This is analogous to having some sort of roach infestation in your house. You can be sure youve killed them all, but theyll always be a threat you need to keep on top off. Bush will get the house tented and take the hurt to them; Kerry will put out some humane traps and hope they leave us alone.
To: arkady_renko
Mr. Edwards...it is YOUR side kick who is the flip flipping idjit...and ALL of America KNOWS what the message was in GW's declaration on winning a war "against terrorism"...BUT while you are busy ignoring your falling numbers, lousy running mate and messageless campaign we invite you to CONTINUE to harp on GW's words all the while you ignore the inconsistencies in your own party's race for the WH...
6 posted on
08/31/2004 11:11:36 AM PDT by
antivenom
("Never argue with an idiot, he'll bring you down to his level - then beat you with experience.")
To: arkady_renko
Methinks Mr. Edwards is another victim of Bush "strategery." They try to capitalize on a gaffe, and in the end they just end up digging an even deeper hole for themselves. Makes me almost wonder if President Bush does this on purpose, knowing he's setting a trap.
7 posted on
08/31/2004 11:12:50 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
To: arkady_renko
Kerry is going down in flames and you're over here arguing semantics. Smooth move ex-lax
20 posted on
08/31/2004 11:28:17 AM PDT by
bad company
((<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">Hatriotism))
To: arkady_renko
I wonder when Edwards will be corrected for daring to be so warlike?
Are the antiwar maggots in the streets of NYC aware of Edwards's warlike stand?
22 posted on
08/31/2004 11:29:12 AM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(https://www.swiftvets.com/swift/ccdonation.php?op=donate&site=SwiftVets)
To: arkady_renko
Come on sweet cheeks you're still alive, defend yuourself.
27 posted on
08/31/2004 11:33:57 AM PDT by
bad company
((<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">Hatriotism))
To: arkady_renko
Strategery, Karl, strategery...
To: arkady_renko
My apologies, my aim seems to be a little off today.
55 posted on
08/31/2004 12:09:11 PM PDT by
bad company
((<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">Hatriotism))
To: arkady_renko
Won?
Yeah right...
I don't believe that for one minute.
UNLESS we are going to go to war with Islam???
Then we will win this war.
75 posted on
08/31/2004 12:25:31 PM PDT by
Cheetah1
To: arkady_renko
But Phil Donnahue says it can't be won: http://www.preventivewarriors.com/
How familiar. Watching those brave American wives last night who spoke at the convention, I have no doubt we will win. They're not going to rest until we do whatever it takes.
78 posted on
08/31/2004 12:30:55 PM PDT by
risk
To: arkady_renko
North Korea... due to national sovereignty and the existence of China, all that can be (or should be) done there is to blockade that fake country to facilitate its inevitable collapse. But, as GWB said, there will always be the risk of terrorist activity, such as in the Phillipines or in Columbia. George W. Bush will be reelected by a margin of at least ten per cent
99 posted on
08/31/2004 10:02:53 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson