Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'60 Minutes' Documents on Bush Might Be Fake
Drudge ^ | 09/09/04 | Drudge

Posted on 09/09/2004 11:55:04 AM PDT by GrandmaPatriot

Edited on 09/09/2004 11:59:36 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

'60 Minutes' Documents on Bush Might Be Fake /// 32-year-old documents produced Wednesday by CBSNEWS 60 MINS on Bush's guard service may have been forged using a current word processing program // typed using a proportional font, not common at that time, and they used a superscript font feature found in today's Microsoft Word program, Internet reports claim... Developing...

****************

60 Minutes' Documents on Bush Might Be Fake
By Robert B. Bluey
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
September 09, 2004

(CNSNews.com) - The 32-year-old documents produced Wednesday by the CBS News program "60 Minutes," shedding a negative light on President Bush's service in the Texas Air National Guard, may have been forged using a current word processing program, according to typography experts.

Three independent typography experts told CNSNews.com they were suspicious of the documents from 1972 and 1973 because they were typed using a proportional font, not common at that time, and they used a superscript font feature found in today's Microsoft Word program.

The "60 Minutes" segment included an interview with former Texas lieutenant governor Ben Barnes, who criticized Bush's service. The news program also produced a series of memos that claim Bush refused to follow an order to undertake a medical examination.

The documents came from the "personal office file" of Bush's former squadron commander Jerry B. Killian, according to Kelli Edwards, a spokeswoman for "60 Minutes," who was quoted in Thursday's Washington Post. Edwards declined to tell the Post how the news program obtained the documents.

But the experts interviewed by CNSNews.com honed in on several aspects of a May 4, 1972, memo, which was part of the "60 Minutes" segment and was posted on the CBS News website Thursday.

"It was highly out of the ordinary for an organization, even the Air Force, to have proportional-spaced fonts for someone to work with," said Allan Haley, director of words and letters at Agfa Monotype in Wilmington, Mass. "I'm suspect in that I did work for the U.S. Army as late as the late 1980s and early 1990s and the Army was still using [fixed-pitch typeface] Courier."

The typography experts couldn't pinpoint the exact font used in the documents. They also couldn't definitively conclude that the documents were either forged using a current computer program or were the work of a high-end typewriter or word processor in the early 1970s.

But the use of the superscript "th" in one document - "111th F.L.S" - gave each expert pause. They said that is an automatic feature found in current versions of Microsoft Word, and it's not something that was even possible more than 30 years ago.

"That would not be possible on a typewriter or even a word processor at that time," said John Collins, vice president and chief technology officer at Bitstream Inc., the parent of MyFonts.com.

"It is a very surprising thing to see a letter with that date [May 4, 1972] on it," and featuring such typography, Collins added. "There's no question that that is surprising. Does that force you to conclude that it's a fake? No. But it certainly raises the eyebrows."

Fred Showker, who teaches typography and introduction to digital graphics at James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Va., questioned the documents' letterhead.

"Let's assume for a minute that it's authentic," Showker said. "But would they not have used some form of letterhead? Or has this letterhead been intentionally cut off? Notice how close to the top of the page it is."

He also pointed to the signature of Killian, the purported author of the May 4, 1972, memo ordering Bush, who was at the time a first lieutenant in the Texas Air National Guard, to obtain a physical exam.

"Do you think he would have stopped that 'K' nice and cleanly, right there before it ran into the typewriter 'Jerry," Showker asked. "You can't stop a ballpoint pen with a nice square ending like that ... The end of that 'K' should be round ... it looks like you took a pair of snips and cut it off so you could see the 'Jerry.'"

The experts also raised questions about the military's typewriter technology three decades ago. Collins said word processors that could produce proportional-sized fonts cost upwards of $20,000 at the time.

"I'm not real sure that you would have that kind of sophistication in the office of a flight inspector in the United States government," Showker said.

"The only thing it could be, possibly, is an IBM golf ball typewriter, which came out around the early to middle 1970s," Haley said. "Those did have proportional fonts on them. But they weren't widely used."

But Haley added that the use of the superscript "th" cast doubt on the use of any typewriter.

"There weren't any typewriters that did that. That looks like it might be a function of something like Microsoft Word, which does that automatically."


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ang; bush; kerry; killian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
To: rushmom
Even if they're not fake,...so he didn't show up for a physical...gasp.

Others have said that the military term is a "medical", and not a physical examination.

41 posted on 09/09/2004 12:10:37 PM PDT by DmBarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

Wow..just got the implication of your comments..that's nuclear, if true


42 posted on 09/09/2004 12:10:51 PM PDT by ken5050 (Bill Clinton has just signed to be the national spokesman for Hummer..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jrawk

Why would they need to do that? If they have done what you said and did a document switch for production values then that raises even more questions, and wil feed into the credibility of there report.


43 posted on 09/09/2004 12:10:54 PM PDT by aft_lizard (I actually voted for John Kerry before I voted against him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Taliesan

"IF"...yes...its over.

We better be damned sure on this one people.


44 posted on 09/09/2004 12:11:16 PM PDT by NJ Neocon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GrandmaPatriot

Bump!


45 posted on 09/09/2004 12:11:26 PM PDT by mtbrandon49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia

Yes.

From the Washington Post this morning:

Documents obtained by the CBS News program "60 Minutes" shed new light on one of the most controversial episodes in Bush's military service, when he abruptly stopped flying and moved from Texas to Alabama to work on a political campaign. The documents include a memo from Bush's squadron commander, Lt. Col. Jerry B. Killian, ordering Bush "to be suspended from flight status for failure to perform" to U.S. Air Force and National Guard standards and failure to take his annual physical "as ordered."

The new documents surfaced as the Bush administration released for the first time the president's personal flight logs, which have been the focus of repeated archival searches and Freedom of Information Act requests dating to the 2000 presidential campaign. The logs show that Bush stopped flying in April 1972 after accumulating more than 570 hours of flight time between 1969 and 1972, much of it on an F-102 interceptor jet.

--snip--

A spokeswoman for "60 Minutes," Kelli Edwards, declined to say exactly how the new documents were obtained other than that CBS News understood they had been taken from Killian's "personal office file." In addition to the order to Bush to report for a physical, the documents include various memos from Killian describing his conversations with Bush and other National Guard officers about Bush's attempts to secure a transfer to Alabama. Killian died in 1984.


46 posted on 09/09/2004 12:11:28 PM PDT by Howlin (I'm mad as Zell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: OnTheDress

There is a dimestore photoshop filter for that, I am just being careful here.

Trust But Verify!

I am just saying if I was Production Assistant on 60 minuts asked to come up with "Memo Graphics" if after I scanned them and found them to be illegible, I may retype the verbiage save, photoshop out the signature, and meet my deadline.

-- l8s
-- jrawk


47 posted on 09/09/2004 12:11:50 PM PDT by jrawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Freepers have posted examples from the IBM executive typewriter. It did exist and did have the superscript "th".

Hmmm. I haven't seen the images, but wasn't the executive also limited to one font size? The "th" in the memo looks smaller to me.

Though superscripting was possible, wasn't it still limited to only superscripting normal-sized text?

48 posted on 09/09/2004 12:12:29 PM PDT by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Boundless
In addition to the CNS points, there are questions about the paper sheet size, zip codes, military abbreviations, and general grammar/tone.

All covered right here on FR last night starting at about 8:30 p.m.

49 posted on 09/09/2004 12:12:33 PM PDT by Howlin (I'm mad as Zell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

The side-by-side comparison is compelling, but look at the date at the top. The 18 is misaligned. Is it possible that parts of the letter are genuine and parts cut and pasted?

Let's demand a look at the originals.


50 posted on 09/09/2004 12:13:01 PM PDT by js1138 (Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GrandmaPatriot
…and it's not something that was even possible more than 30 years ago.

I don’t know. My mom was a secretary at White Sands from the 50’s up into the 80’s.

I don’t know what year it was – at least in the late 70’s – that she had an IBM Selectric that used the different little balls to change the font/type size. I know they had special balls that had all the weird fractions and symbols and stuff. Know that for a fact because I routinely got in trouble for screwing around with the typewriter and switching out the balls and stuff…

51 posted on 09/09/2004 12:13:37 PM PDT by Who dat?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

That, I believe, is the case. However, the WH strategy may simply be to blow the whole thing off. If they dispute it, the story stays in the headlines. If they don't dispute it, the media has to come up with something else in order to keep the thing going.


52 posted on 09/09/2004 12:13:43 PM PDT by ambrose (http://www.swiftvets.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks. That must mean that they were not among the documents that the White House verified.


53 posted on 09/09/2004 12:13:51 PM PDT by Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: flevit

why do I smell a CLINTON plant???????

I was thinking Clinton too!


54 posted on 09/09/2004 12:14:04 PM PDT by tapatio (Society is always taken by surprise at any new example of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
The White House acknowledged that the documents released by the Pentagon were real.

These are NOT government documents.

Sorry I didn't watch 60 minutes, why would anyone give any credence to "personal files". In fact I have a whole drawer full of personal files that tell me John Kerry did Kitty Kelly to promote this book.

55 posted on 09/09/2004 12:14:12 PM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Pete; OnTheDress; eastsider; TheCrusader; finnman69

Trust But Verify!

I am just saying if I was Production Assistant on 60 minuts asked to come up with "Memo Graphics" if after I scanned them and found them to be illegible, I may retype the verbiage save, photoshop out the signature, and meet my deadline.

-- l8s
-- jrawk


56 posted on 09/09/2004 12:14:20 PM PDT by jrawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

To try to "finish off" Bush?


57 posted on 09/09/2004 12:14:43 PM PDT by Howlin (I'm mad as Zell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I'm making sure that WE get the credit this time!

Take a well-deserved bow because it was YOU who first raised the possibility of forgery.

58 posted on 09/09/2004 12:17:13 PM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GrandmaPatriot
Talk about rope-a-dope! With the increasing likelihood that all these documents are forgeries, this will backfire in the MSM's face.

Hmmm, do you think the MSM will admit they got suckered? Is the MSM going to report bad news about itself? Or will there be a quiet little retraction on page 12b?

59 posted on 09/09/2004 12:17:14 PM PDT by crv16
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandmaPatriot
See also: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1210987/posts

Haley's conclusions are not well informed. The IBM "Executive" typewriter, introduced in the 1940's and carried through to the 1970's, used proportional fonts. Also, while we haven't uncovered conclusive evidence yet, it is certainly possible that a "superscript th" would appear as a single character on the typewriter.

60 posted on 09/09/2004 12:17:29 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson