The True Believer 2001: The Rise of Islam and Communism

In 1951, a book by Eric Hoffer was published that remains a classic to this day. It is "The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements." You can still purchase it as a Harper Perennial softcover. No one who wants to understand the last century and this new one should fail to read Hoffer's extraordinary examination of fanaticism and frustration when it is channeled into nationalism, religious movements, or the political perversion known as Communism.

The individual to whom Hoffer referred as the "true believer" is essential to mass movements and we are seeing this today in the rise of Islamic fundamentalism and the revival of Communism. To those who think Communism is dead, I suggest you check the map for nations that include Russia, China, North Korea, Cuba, and places like Venezuela. Communism is on the march again.

Islamic fundamentalism has the Middle East in its grip. Hoffer's true believer is best seen in the expendable youths who strap explosives to their chests and kill themselves in acts of terrorism against Israeli citizens. "The true believer sees himself part of something that stretches endlessly backward and forward-something eternal. Dying, too, they see as a gesture, an act of make-believe."

At the very heart of all mass movements are people who feel frustrated. By this, Hoffer means those who believe their lives are spoiled or wasted. "The frustrated favor radical change." Here, though, is where it gets really interesting, "A mass movement attracts and holds a following not because it can satisfy the desire for self-advancement, but because it can satisfy the passion for self-renunciation." The other form of true believers are those anarchists and radical leftists found in the streets protesting every time the leaders of Western nations gather.Individualists, people taught to think for themselves, do not join mass movements.

"Faith in a holy cause," said Hoffer, "is to a considerable extent a substitute for the lost faith in ourselves. The less justified a man is in claiming excellence for his own self, the more ready is he to claim all excellence for his nation, his religion, his race or his holy cause."

What is roiling the Middle East is the "jihad", the holy war. It is not just a war on Israel. It is an Islamic war on all other religions, but primarily its progenitors, Judaism and Christianity. Islam is about 1,500 years old, the last of the world's mass religions to come along, having cherry-picked its precepts from both earlier religions.

Islam is a religion created for desert tribes that it finds itself at a crossroads in the modern world it fears will undermine its strictures. Theseinclude Islam's rules regarding the relationship between men and women, the prohibition on charging interest for the use of money, prohibitions on alcohol and certain foods, and its insistence that Mohammed was the last, true prophet. It does not merely recommend prayer; it requires it five times daily.

Islam is a religion at war with the present and the future. Its golden age was when it was most tolerant. It has now lapsed into its own Dark Ages.

"All true believers of our time," wrote Hoffer, "declaimed volubly on the decadence of the Western democracies. The burden of their talk is that those in the democracies are too soft, too pleasure loving and too selfish to die for a nation, a God, or a holy cause. This lack of readiness to die, we are told, is indicative of an inner rot-a moral and biological decay."

Hoffer, who wrote his book shortly after the defeat of Germany's Nazism, Italy's Fascism, and Japanese nationalism and at a time when Soviet Communism, led by Stalin, was seeking to impose itself on the world, warned "It always fares ill with the present when a genuine mass movement is on the march." This is no less true today as Communism works to reassert itself and as Islamic fundamentalism threatens world peace.

It is American culture, its political and economic success that poses the greatest threat to both movements. It is no accident that the victims in Beijing's Tienanamen Square had erected a replica of the State of Liberty! It is no accident that, as a nation, Israel embodies and protects the tenets of both Judaism and Christianity. For both Communism and Islamic fundamentalism, it is American ideals of individual freedom, Capitalism, and religious tolerance that are the enemy.

In the case of Islamic fundamentalism, Hoffer identifies its root cause. "The discontent generated in backward countries by their contact with Western civilization is not primarily resentment against exploitation by domineering foreigners. It is rather the result of a crumbling or weakening of tribal solidarity and communal life."

Soviet Communism underwent a transformation when Russians in its eastern regions were able to see television coming out of Europe. The comparison between the economic abundance and lifestyle of America and Europe, and the austerity that Soviet Communism compelled was sufficient to create the dissatisfaction that forced the Party to try reforms and, from there, it was a swift slide to its loss of power. However, a decade later, unable to master the rule of law and concepts of private property, the Russians are ripe for renewed rule by the Communist Party. It remains the dominant party in the Russian Duma.

In the same way, the failure of Middle Eastern despots to provide economic prosperity throughout the region has been fashioned into a holy war to focus their people's frustration on external enemies that include Israel and the West. Here again, Hoffer offers a wonderful insight. "When people revolt in a totalitarian society, they rise not against the wickedness of the regime, but its weakness."

The 21st century has inherited all the leftover problems of the 20th and added a new one, the Islamic holy war. The United States of America has emerged from the last century as the lone superpower, but it can only remain one if it is willing to assert that power. Half measures do nothing but prolong problems. The United States, a nation based on belief in the rights of the individual to enjoy and exercise Constitutionally guaranteed freedoms, bears a heavy burden in these early hours of a new century.

Hoffer wrote "the freedom the masses crave is not freedom of self-expression and self-realization. They want freedom from 'the fearful burden of free choice'…They do not want freedom of conscience, but faith-blind, authoritarian faith."

Both Communism and the rise of Islamic fundamentalism offer blind, authoritarian faith.

In 1951, Hoffer wrote, "The true believer is everywhere on the march, shaping the world in his own image. Whether we line up with him or against him, it is well we should know all we can concerning his nature and potentialities." This is no less true today than when those words were penned over a half century ago.

This commentary is made available through the support of Dave Anderson of Napa, California.

another good read on this dynamic here:

http://www.zpub.com/notes/masters.html

excerpt from Masters of Deceit: The Story of Communism in America and How to Fight It, by J. Edgar Hoover, 1958 *

Mass Agitation

The Party's attack is geared to the wide variety of American life. Communism has something to sell to everybody. And, following this principle, it is the function of mass agitation to exploit all the grievances, hopes, aspirations, prejudices, fears, and ideals of all the special groups that make up our society, social, religious, economic, racial, political. Stir them up. Set one against the other. Divide and conquer. That's the way to soften up a democracy.

Agitation must be carried on in specialized fields: among women, among youth, among veterans, among racial and nationality groups, farmers, trade unions. That's the responsibility of the Party commissions.

The approach always has two sides: (1) the deceptive line designed for public consumption, and (2) the real Party line designed to advance communism.

Thus the Party, through its specialized and immediate demands, is able to gain entree into various groups and create favorable working conditions for future revolutionary action. Very quickly, for example:

-- a veterans' meeting endorses "peace."

-- a nationality festival passes a resolution for "peace."

-- a youth affair favors "peace."

-- a neighborhood group comes out for "peace."

-- a women's rally fights for "peace."

Whatever its composition, the group, once under communist control, is switched to the Party line. The feigned interest in legitimate demands is merely a trap.
snipped.....more @ link

For anyone who has not read "The True Believer," I highly encourage them to do so. It's a quick read, and is very insightful but lacks any sense of intellectual pretentiousness (probably because Hoffer was a longshoreman by trade). And you'll come away from the experience undertanding well the connection between Islamist fundamentalism, terrorism, and the failures of Muslim society.

This is the theory that dictatorships rely on: like the comments made by some in Iraq that "Iraq needs a new strongman".

..."...the freedom the masses crave is not freedom of self-expression and self-realization. They want freedom from 'the fearful burden of free choice'…They do not want freedom of conscience, but faith-blind, authoritarian faith."...

Islam provides the authoritarian ruler--dictating every phase of one's life.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.