Posted on 09/11/2004 7:40:09 AM PDT by Hillary'sMoralVoid
As a retired Air Force officer, I humbly suggest that the Killian family release the following statement to the press:
Based on overwhelming forensic evidence, significant internal discrepancies, and our intimate knowledge of the husband and father we knew as Lieutenant Colonel Jerry Killian, we hereby declare the documents presented on CBS 60 minutes II to be forgeries.
Moreover, any documents of this nature that may exist are not official Air National Guard records, but are the personal records of LtCol Killian and rightfully belong with his family. We did not and would never authorize any documents of this nature for public release. Whoever would obtain these documents of this nature would violate the privacy of a deceased Air National Guard member and would have obtained the documents surrepticiously and against his will.
We are outraged that a major news outlet would have so little respect for the family of a deceased service member as to so pathetically attempt to manipulate the words of that member for political gain.
I humbly hope that the family will issue some type of formal statement or news release of this nature. If anyone can get this post to them, p;ease forward it.
I know you can't libel the dead. But that doesn't mean there isn't another legal theory for a cause of action.
Bump
Hmmmm. They had to say they were personal papers because falsifying official documents is a felony, and the Justice Department could have launched an investigation.<p.However, if these were personal papers, released without permission of the estate, perhaps there is a possibility of a lawsuit against CBS for defamation of the late Col. Killian's character.
That's the direction I was thinking--but I'd prefer Ben Ginsberg's advice on this particular matter.
CBS says they were "personal". I suspect it would also be appropriate to file suit for theft of said "personal" papers. Let a court decide if they are real or not.
Please add:
"This fraud has defamed the proud name of Lieutenant Colonel Jerry Killian, a man who served his country well. In order to ensure that such libelous acts are discouraged in the future, the Killian family will seek punative damages against those who allowed this fraud to occur."
Good advice from all!
Where's the 'you'll hear from our lawyer' sentence? Edwards should be all over this like a cheap suit. Hey, here's some work for him after Nov. 2.
Ah- but if they were "personal papers"- then CBS is being inaccurate to characterize one memo as being a "direct order" to Bush (to obtain a flight physical)
No military order is ever a personal paper.
They should sue CBS. This time next year they will be very rich.
Even the threat of a lawsuit would force CBS management to roll over.
May I add that not only should they sue but I'd bet that Ben Ginsburg would gladly take their case.
Paragraphs 2 and 3 of your proposed message open several doors that contradict paragraph 1. CBS and the kerry campaign would benefit immensely if for no reason other than arguing that the family alludes to the possible existence of the alleged information as well as documents.
Paragraph 1 would be sufficient if they would prepare a statement/affidavit. Hopefully they can and will undertake a civil action that will allow them to determine the source of and chain of events behind the CBS matter.
Dan Rather's stand
By Wolf Blitzer
CNN
http://cnn.usnews.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=CNN.com+-+Dan+Rather%27s+stand+-+Sep+10%2C+2004&expire=-1&urlID=11603991&fb=Y&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2004%2FUS%2F09%2F10%2Frather%2Findex.html&partnerID=2004
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- This is not the first time Dan Rather has found himself in a serious dispute with a U.S. president.
There was this exchange in 1974 during the height of the Watergate scandal with then-President Richard Nixon:
Nixon: Are you running for something?
Rather: No sir, are you?
And there was this exchange with then-Vice President George Bush in 1988 over the Iran-Contra scandal.
Rather: I don't want to be argumentative, Mr. vice president.
Bush: You do, Dan.
Rather: No -- no, sir, I don't.
Bush: This is not a great night, because I want to talk about why I want to be president, why those 41 percent of the people are supporting me. And I don't think it's fair to judge my whole career by a rehash of Iran. How would you like it if I judged your career by those seven minutes when you walked off the set in New York?
Now, the 72-year-old CBS News anchor finds himself in yet another confrontation with a Republican president.
"I want to emphasize: I stand by my president. We are in a time of war, and I stand behind my president. There is not joy in reporting such a story, but my job as a journalist is not to be afraid, and when we come with facts, and legitimate questions supported by witnesses and documents that we believe to be authentic, to raise those questions no matter how unpleasant they are," Rather said Friday.
At issue is his report on "60 Minutes" that aired Wednesday -- a report that included documents purporting to show that the current President Bush, while serving in the Texas Air National Guard, did not meet all his military obligations.
"They [the White House] have not answered the question of did or did the president not obey or obey an order? Was he or was he not suspended for failure to meet performance standards of the Air Force? If he didn't take the physical, why didn't he take the physical?" Rather said.
But now, there are questions about the authenticity of the documents released by "60 Minutes."
The Washington Post says the "60 Minutes" documents are not consistent with other documents released by Bush's Air National Guard unit in the early '70's.
"If you compare the documents that CBS produced with the documents that we know to be authentic, that did come from Bush's National Guard unit, none of those documents use proportionate spacing. And that's only one of the anomalies," says the Post's Michael Dobbs.
Experts contacted by CNN say there are some inconsistencies in the type style and formatting -- noting those styles then existed on typewriters but were not common. They also say only a review of the original documents -- not copies -- can completely resolve the matter.
Beyond that, surviving relatives of Bush's then commander, Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, the author of the purported documents, insist they are fake. They say Killian always believed Bush was an excellent pilot and that he never wrote these documents. Killian died in 1984.
"The story is true. The story is true," Rather said. "The questions raised in the story are serious and legitimate questions."
Rather denies there is any internal CBS News investigation under way -- a statement backed by the network.
Rather also said the possibility of issuing any kind of recant or apology was "not even discussed. Nor should it be."
Can you sue yourself?
No military order is typed up as a memorandum, either.
If they are personal docs of the deceased, they belong to the estate of the LTC...IOW's...the family.
RATHER: STICK TO YOUR GUNS!!!
(it will only be that much more embarrassing for him when he is forced to bite the dust later)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.