Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two more "Killian" documents
USA Today | 9/11/2004 | Charleston1

Posted on 09/11/2004 4:09:42 PM PDT by charleston1

The CBSNEWS website includes links to four pdf files that are allegedly documents produced by the late Lt. Colonel Jerry B. Killian. The USA Today website (search on "bush docs") includes a link "see the memos" which links to a pdf file which includes all of the CBS documents and two more. The two additional "Killian" documents are dated 02 February 1972, and 24 June 1973. The earlier document includes the more informal "Jerry B. Killian" signature block but no signature. The later document is an apparent practice letter with a salutation to "sir" but no address or name of the person to whom Colonel Killian is trying to correspond. I can certainly understand why these two additional documents did not make the "60 Minutes" cut. They are worth reviewing for a number of reasons if you have not seen them.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; killian; napalminthemorning; seethememos; tang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: deport

"Welcome to FR..... hope you enjoy the forum"

Thank you very much. I certainly am enjoying it and I must admit I am quite impressed with the intelligence level shown here. This is like supersleuth heaven. I must I admit I am overwhelmed by the traffic volume. You see I type about as fast as Colonel Killian did.


41 posted on 09/11/2004 4:59:56 PM PDT by charleston1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

CBS Evening Slews?

Perhaps CBS Evening Screws?


42 posted on 09/11/2004 5:00:29 PM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: moonman

Staldt retired in '72, not Killian. One of the memos written in 73 talks about Staldt putting pressure on Killian.


43 posted on 09/11/2004 5:03:28 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: YOUGOTIT

"The J on the signature of the Aug 72 memo is not the same as the J on the June 73 memo. Or am I seeing things?"

No you are not seeing things. Dan Rather may be seeing things--like a pink slip.


44 posted on 09/11/2004 5:04:40 PM PDT by charleston1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly

OK Thanks:)


45 posted on 09/11/2004 5:08:01 PM PDT by moonman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: charleston1
"I certainly am enjoying it and I must admit I am quite impressed with the intelligence level shown here."

There are probably some topics and threads you should avoid so you can retain that impression.

46 posted on 09/11/2004 5:08:15 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: NavySEAL F-16

Nothing about it is in military style. I clicked the link, was able to see the first document for a few seconds. Then things glitch out. Can't get link to work right now.
If this is a joke, cool.
If not, forger is inept at best an idiot at worst.


47 posted on 09/11/2004 5:09:28 PM PDT by MagnumRancid (I need a new screen name - its left over from my Doom/Quake playing days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: CWOJackson

Me too. Now that CBS knows how to make the fakes, they can make plenty. This should be fun.


49 posted on 09/11/2004 5:10:30 PM PDT by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

by the way guys, the new June 24th memo has centered text with a superscript th in the squadron name. Based on the work the shade of days guy did, this could be pretty decisive. The spacing would be different for a typewriter and would be harder to center. Of course word with center this perfectly and if this new memo matches up to word that is really going to go a long way towards once and for all saying the selectric composer couldn't have done these.


50 posted on 09/11/2004 5:12:45 PM PDT by killbuckner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

October surprise?


51 posted on 09/11/2004 5:18:47 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: killbuckner
"by the way guys, the new June 24th memo has centered text with a superscript th in the squadron name"

I saw that but thought the August 1972 memo was superscripted in the letterhead too. I went back and checked and I think you are right. The August 1972 memo is not superscripted. Now what about this "shade of days guy?" Can you share more on that and contact him with this new document info? It is more to analyze.
52 posted on 09/11/2004 5:19:21 PM PDT by charleston1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly

If the DNC Photoshop commandos aren't careful it could well be. Just wait until someone sees that Colonel Killian also signed the recommendation for Kerry's Silver Star.


53 posted on 09/11/2004 5:20:49 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: charleston1

THERES SOMETHING FISHY GOING ON HERE

Why are none of the markings on the USA Today versions? You cant erase pen and marker ink. This would imply that USAT had these documents before CBS got them. If CBS could have I'm sure they would have released dodcuments without the pen marks and the longmont blackout.

So the question is why does USA Today have clean versions, while CBS was forced to use marked up versions?


54 posted on 09/11/2004 5:20:53 PM PDT by Oblongata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oblongata

We need to find every difference between the USA Today versions and the CBS versions. I have a suspicion that someone in the chain between CBS and USA Today, either created or made new versions of these memos.


55 posted on 09/11/2004 5:23:09 PM PDT by Oblongata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Oblongata

56 posted on 09/11/2004 5:26:23 PM PDT by Bryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Oblongata

57 posted on 09/11/2004 5:26:27 PM PDT by Bryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: The Bandit

They've gone through a couple extra replications. CBS sent docs to the White House & the White House sent copies out to all other media outlets. Every replication is going to degrade the copy.


58 posted on 09/11/2004 5:27:51 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: charleston1

These memos are useful for at least one thing:

The typing technology of the day made it difficult to center text (as with just about everything these "magical" memos do all too effortlessly).

Any complaints that the letterhead is too perfectly centered could be countered with the argument that the letterhead was pre-printed on the originals.

But the memo with the incomplete letterhead proves the letterheads were not pre-printed.

It's easy to speculate about the quality of Times Roman fonts available to typists in 1972. But it's impossible to center text that perfectly without a computer, even now.


59 posted on 09/11/2004 5:29:03 PM PDT by cpurick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charleston1

Sorry. Had the name of the blog wrong. It was shade of days.

http://shapeofdays.typepad.com/the_shape_of_days/

He contacted the maintainer of the selectric composer website and had him try and reproduce the memos using it because so much of the left is in a tizzy over this machine. The guy talks about how hard it is to center text while using a proportional font because you have to know EXACTLY what spacing is in each letter. But the header would be something that Killian would have to type a lot and it was THEORETICALLY possible that he figured it out and just always used that same spacing. Or even that he did it perfect once (not just perfect to the eye, perfect to the level of mircosoft) and just xeroxed it and used it over and over. But if it is still perfectly centered even with the superscript th that is going to remove a couple more of the left talking points. I already emailed him a couple minutes ago on this one.


60 posted on 09/11/2004 5:29:22 PM PDT by killbuckner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson