CBS 'stonewalling' raises doubts on role in debates

Washington Times ^ | 9/17/04 | Ralph Z. Hallow

[Chieftain]

Thanks Julie, they just got an email from me!

[beyond the sea]

maybe the moderators for the debate could include JimRob.

LOL!

[beyond the sea]

ping

[Alia]

Thanks for the ping!, Kattracks. What nailed CBS out of the "moderator"/debate position, big time? Insisting that the contents were "true" although the docs were a forgery. "See! The emperor has new clothes!" That was a BAD move.

[JulieRNR21]

LOL....there is an uncanny resemblence!

[MeekOneGOP]

hehe!

It was amazing. The pic I snipped out of Ra^ther for that pic fit perfectly
over Nixon's head. The only brushing I had to do was on the neck.

[Gaffer]

The official response and/or acceptance of debate terms and conditions from the President's representatives should be,
"We will accept no moderator from CBS, period!"

Bush will do just fine with, or without a debate with horseface. Flipper can't say anything about IRAQ without p!ssing off half of his crazy voting base.....

end of story....

[Kitty Mittens]

Dan rather has finally, once and for all, been unmasked as the Wacko Leftist he is, put out openly on display, and should be immediately fired, and then investigated for his part in this criminal escapade and coverup! Of course, I won't hold my breath, but one can always hope!

I agree that CBS should have no part in the Debates whatsoever, and I hope a ground-swell of animosity towards them will bring that to pass. Brit would be an excellent choice to replace Schieffer!