Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Candidate Forums At Churches Inform Voters And That's Good
Tampa Tribune ^ | September 18, 2004

Posted on 09/18/2004 2:57:07 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

A month ago, the Internal Revenue Service mailed a letter to the First Baptist Church of College Hill inquiring about a visit two years ago by Janet Reno, then a Democratic candidate for governor. The letter caused the Rev. Abraham Brown to move a scheduled political forum from the historically black church. Why? Because if the IRS found the church was supporting or opposing a political candidate, it could revoke the church's tax-exempt status.

No church in the United States has ever lost its tax-exempt status, but in a campaign season when the presidential candidates are reaching out to church members for support, complaints to the IRS are picking up.

Like most people, we don't believe churches should explicitly endorse candidates for public office. A survey released last month by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life found that 65 percent of Americans oppose church endorsements of political candidates.

But neither should the political parties or a political interest group like Americans United for Separation of Church and State use the IRS as a club to still pastors' tongues or prevent the political education of their congregations.

Historically, the civil rights movement would have gone nowhere if black churches had been divorced from champions of equality.

Even with the IRS rules in place, churches can do a lot politically. They can encourage voter registration and get-out-the-vote drives. They can put together voter guides or fact sheets that contain the views of candidates as long as the list is not an endorsement.

It's even OK for candidates to speak from the pulpit, so long as they don't talk about their candidacy.

In a nation where the majority of voters are people of faith whose views are inspired by religious conviction, religion and politics will never be mutually exclusive.

A church that entertains a candidate or hosts a political forum to inform voters is not a threat. It's an asset.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: campaign; church; election; electioneering; politicking; politics; pulpit; religion; vote; voters
Bookmark this for when they attack conservatives for talking about political issues in their house of God.
1 posted on 09/18/2004 2:57:07 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

yup


2 posted on 09/18/2004 3:35:21 AM PDT by Talking_Mouse (Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just... Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talking_Mouse

A touchy subject BUMP!


3 posted on 09/18/2004 4:16:09 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
No church in the United States has ever lost its tax-exempt status...

What was the name of the church in NY that was sued by the IRS for engaging in political discussion? IIRC the Dems furor was over abortion politics not leftie-rightie politics.

It should say,

"No leftist church has ever been sued by the Feds or lost its tax-exempt status ..."

4 posted on 09/18/2004 5:15:28 AM PDT by texas booster (Make a resolution to better yourself and your community in '04 - vote Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texas booster
"No leftist church has ever been sued by the Feds or lost its tax-exempt status ..."

Bump!

5 posted on 09/18/2004 5:54:04 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

THE preacher at our church reminds people to vote on the issues like gay rights, and to look at the canidate who sees your side ,which means GWB they just never say it.


6 posted on 09/18/2004 7:11:28 AM PDT by douglas1 (what JOHN KERRY DID AFTER HE CA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hiskid

PING


7 posted on 09/18/2004 7:58:52 AM PDT by reformedliberal (When the elites speak their power to our truth, they have given us cause for revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; texas booster

"No church in the United States has ever lost its tax-exempt status"

Leave it to a journalist to make (re-make) history:


http://www.aclj.org/News/Nr_000512.Asp

Of course, in the view of most journalists (mostly leftists), this church
probably doesn't count.
Heck, they're probably some sort of hate-group against gay marriage!


8 posted on 09/18/2004 12:32:14 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: douglas1
THE preacher at our church reminds people to vote on the issues like gay rights,
and to look at the canidate who sees your side ,which means GWB they just never say it.


I'm not a lawyer, but from listening to Jay Sekulow Live (www.aclj.org), that
sounds like the legal (IRS) way to do it.

Hopefully the kindly parishioners who can't get a message like that
won't be bright (or sufficiently motivated) enough to vote.
9 posted on 09/18/2004 12:34:32 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: VOA; All

***
Even with the IRS rules in place, churches can do a lot politically. They can encourage voter registration and get-out-the-vote drives. They can put together voter
guides or fact sheets that contain the views of candidates as long as the list is not an endorsement. ***


10 posted on 09/18/2004 12:37:35 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
They can put together voter guides or fact sheets that contain the views of candidates
as long as the list is not an endorsement.


for once, I hope "liberal" is the way these rules are applied.

As in my hope that a voting guide could also include interpretations and
predictions of outcomes of a politician's stance.
E.g. "Senator Kerry's 'states-rights' approach to gay marriage and his failure to
vote for a federal DOMA amendment is evidence of his support for an end-run to
institute gay marriage. The states-right approach will assuredly be defeated
by a court challenge based on a constitutional challenge. Kerry IS a gay-marriage
supporter, no matter his words."
11 posted on 09/18/2004 12:43:06 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VOA
'President' Kerry ready to fight for LGBT rights
12 posted on 09/18/2004 12:50:26 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson