Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Rush to Air, CBS Quashed Memo Worries
Washington Post ^ | 09/20/2004 | Howard Kurtz, Michael Dobbs

Posted on 09/18/2004 7:27:43 PM PDT by jhouston

In the early-morning hours of Sept. 8, Dan Rather was preparing to fly to Washington for a crucial interview in the Old Executive Office Building, but torrential rain kept him in New York.

White House communications director Dan Bartlett had agreed to talk to "60 Minutes," but only on condition that the CBS program provide copies of what were being billed as newly unearthed memos indicating that President Bush had received preferential treatment in the National Guard. The papers were hand-delivered at 7:45 a.m. CBS correspondent John Roberts, filling in for Rather, sat down with Bartlett at 11:15.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cbs; cbsnews; forgery; killian; kurtz; michaeldobbs; napalminthemorning; rather; tang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-295 last
To: topdog1
What a decent journalist would do is find out who was working at the Abilene Kinko's at the time the memos were sent, show him/her some pictures and see if we can get a positive ID on the sender. Since Burkett limps and uses a cane, it should be easy to verify or eliminate him. If it was Barnes or the lawyer or some other TX Dem party operative, then there's your smoking gun.

Assuming the memos were actually sent from there at that time. It would also have been possible that Burkett happened to fax something other than the memos to someone involved in the conspiracy, who then faked the transmission stamp on some memos to match the date/time of Burketts' fax. Forensic analysis would be needed to determine whether the memogate documents were actually sent from that Kinko's; it may prove that they likely were or that they certainly weren't, or it may be inconclusive.

281 posted on 09/19/2004 3:01:35 PM PDT by supercat (If Kerry becomes President, nothing bad will happen for which he won't have an excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: jhouston

I was wondering what the actions of WH communications director Dan Bartlett reminded me of. I realized that it reminded me of the actions of fictional WH communications director Connie Spano, in the blockbuster movie "Independence Day". Maybe Bartlett is a fan of the way Spano acted in the movie?

When Connie is being pressed to provide a White House statement about the strange 'atmospheric phenomenon', someone says CNN is running with a story about a nuclear test. She says 'Tell them to run with it if they want to embarrass themselves'. 'Our official position is that we don't have an official position'. Sounds like something Barlett said back to CBS on Sept 8.


282 posted on 09/19/2004 3:01:41 PM PDT by plushaye (President Bush - Four more years! Thanks Swifties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hobson

Well there's a good character witness! I'll certainly believe anything Van Os says on behalf of Burkett, won't you? I'll also believe Barnes and Burkett, Rather and Mapes, and anyone else with some pricey swampland to sell. Just because Burkett compares G.W. Bush to Adolf Hitler doesn't mean his judgment and character could be in question....


283 posted on 09/19/2004 5:06:57 PM PDT by Enchante (Jayson Blair left the NY Times and works for Dan Rather at CBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
If this were a court case and Dan was on the stand the prosecution would be saying, "You are a crook and a forger Mr.Rather," and poor Dan's ONLY defense would be "No I'm not I'm just an incompetent.
284 posted on 09/19/2004 5:08:41 PM PDT by mjames (What goes around comes around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
O'Reilly: (punches Rather)

LOL! I usually think politics is better without physical violence. But I'd make an exception for your scenario -- I'd like to see someone at 60 Minutes get popped for what they've done. They've been smirking at America for decades.

285 posted on 09/19/2004 5:27:27 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Mach9
Would YOU trust Cleland with ANY job--much less a "secret" job?

Hell, no. I can't imagine him being more involved than a phone call back to Terry Mc or the Kerry campaign. Something along the lines of "Hey, I jues' gotta call from this nutcase down in Texas, sez he knows ol' Barnesy, with this heah weird idear on howta embarrass Bush. Says he's got docka-ments. Mebbe you orta talk at 'im."

One-way communication. Nothing complicated. Max could handle that. I think...

286 posted on 09/19/2004 6:08:34 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
"If they're the same copies I've seen, the header is *TO* CBS *from* a phone number which turns out to be the Kinko's print shop in Abilene Texas."

Hey, I've tried to keep up, but I have to work sometime. Also I don't watch a lot of TV. I'd heard that the copies came from Kinko's but I wasn't sure if it was true or what evidence it was based on. If true, WHAT KIND OF IDIOT WOULD FAX COPIES OF FAKE DOCUMENTS TO CBS FROM KINKO'S AND HOW WOULD CBS NOT CATCH THAT ONE. Maybe unimpeachable sources don't have access to fax machines. Also, I don't know, do Kinko's have computers for use by public? You don't think maybe doc's originated there? That would really be something. >
287 posted on 09/19/2004 6:30:20 PM PDT by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Someone on Fox Sunday Morning show was talking about framing a guilty man. arrrggggg!!! But actually, this whole mess totally nullifies any attacks on Bush's service if anyone ever cared. I love it though when they keep printing one of those adorable pictures of him when he was in the NG. He was so cute. Still is.


288 posted on 09/19/2004 6:30:42 PM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Ah heah ya.


289 posted on 09/19/2004 6:43:07 PM PDT by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

"Too bad we don't have one of those Star Trek space-based penal colonies yet. Love to see Mapes, Rather, and the rest of these pissants doing hard time on an asteroid mining colony far away from the rest of us."

No No, it would be much better if they were caught in a space time continuum and had to repeat their same pathetic mistake over and over and over again.


290 posted on 09/19/2004 6:46:49 PM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: jhouston

In a DEM scheme and liberal conspiracy CBS was to air these memos, prior to Kitty Kelley's interviews with NBC hoping to set up speculation that GW refused an order to take a physical, thus suggesting there was a drug problem.


291 posted on 09/19/2004 6:48:57 PM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hobson
"Dan's "unimpeachable source" may just be someone he justified in his own mind--Mary Mapes, Van Os, Barnes. He did say on O'Reilly's show that a lie isn't always a lie."

Rather didn't really say that did he? "A lie isn't always a lie." I mean, am I on another planet or something? Lately I feel like I've been away for a few years, like Rip Van Winkle or something, and woke up in another world.
292 posted on 09/19/2004 6:54:30 PM PDT by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: saleman
Rather didn't really say that did he?

I didn't quite get that right. Here's what he actually said in response to O'Reilly's question about Bill Clinton being an honest guy:

Well, because I think he is. I think at core, he's an honest person. I know that you have a different view. I know that you consider it sort of astonishing anybody would say so. But I think you can be an honest person and lie about any number of things.

293 posted on 09/19/2004 7:05:15 PM PDT by hobson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

Are you saying that some of Kerry's documents are forged too?


294 posted on 09/19/2004 7:12:30 PM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: jhouston
As the days begin to blur for Josh Howard, he embraces the same logic: "So much of this debate has focused on the documents, and no one has really challenged the story. It's been frustrating to us to see all this reduced to a debate over little 'th's."

CBS hasn't learned a thing. The last paragraph from the story reads:

As the days begin to blur for Josh Howard, he embraces the same logic: "So much of this debate has focused on the documents, and no one has really challenged the story. It's been frustrating to us to see all this reduced to a debate over little 'th's."

295 posted on 09/19/2004 10:54:20 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-295 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson