Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Please, don't confuse the trial lawyers with logic and fact.
1 posted on 09/21/2004 3:25:11 PM PDT by BattleFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BattleFlag

Ignore all studies. Ignore all polls.

This has been my mantra for many years.


2 posted on 09/21/2004 3:27:03 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BattleFlag
snack foods and soda are actually not a cause of childhood obesity.

Is this from Scrappleface, The Onion or DEBKA?

3 posted on 09/21/2004 3:33:47 PM PDT by harrycarey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BattleFlag

My [very wide] ass!


4 posted on 09/21/2004 3:34:32 PM PDT by null and void (If we took the bones out, it wouldn't be crunchy, would it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BattleFlag
Finally, some good news!

Michael M. Bates: My Side of the Swamp

5 posted on 09/21/2004 3:35:56 PM PDT by Mike Bates (Irritate a liberal. Buy "Right Angles and Other Obstinate Truths.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BattleFlag
Harvard Study: Snack Foods And Soda Not Linked To Obesity
My massively-swollen butt and cottage-cheese thighs argue otherwise! My enormous girth takes issue with that claim! My plaqued-out arteries all testify against the researchers of Harvard! Every quivering, sweating, jelly-like inch of me balks at their so-called study! I shall eat ten sticks of butter like snickers bars and wash them down with six Red Bulls to express my indignation!
6 posted on 09/21/2004 3:37:11 PM PDT by Asclepius (protectionists would outsource our dignity and prosperity in return for illusory job security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BattleFlag

The truth is that is is simply a balance between calories taken in and calories burned. A kid who is on the cross country track team and who runs a good number of miles a day can eat all the junk food he wants and not gain an ounce..... but the kid who sits in front of a TV will not burn off those junk food calories fast enough.


7 posted on 09/21/2004 3:51:14 PM PDT by Apple Pan Dowdy (... as American as Apple Pie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BattleFlag

It always comes down to "asstime."


9 posted on 09/21/2004 3:59:31 PM PDT by Old Professer (The Truth always gets lost in the Noise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BattleFlag
A study that does not find a statistically significant link between two factors does not prove that one factor does not cause the other. It simply means that the study failed to find a link if a link actually exists. Now if a study cannot find a statistically significant link it is probable that in reality the link does not exist, but it is still possible that the a real link was masked by other factors that the study could not control. I'm not taking sides in this particular debate. I'm just pointing out that a statistically insignificant result, doesn't prove a thing. Researchers tend to gloss over this fact, because they don't want to admit that their study was a waste of time and taxpayer's money.
11 posted on 09/21/2004 4:08:33 PM PDT by Pres Raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BattleFlag

Insufficient vigorous activity? There isn't enough time in the day for kids to work off the fat and calories from a lot of this stuff. Better answer: if you can't/won't work it off, don't eat it.


13 posted on 09/21/2004 4:17:37 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BattleFlag
Most kids do not have access to the types of recreation that was available to children of earlier generations. Things like climbing tree, riding horses, and walking through the woods are replaced with safe activities. TV watching is an activity that has less risk than playing hopscotch on a sidewalk full of child molesters. We are raising a generation of safe, indoctrinated, and fat children.
14 posted on 09/21/2004 4:24:51 PM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BattleFlag
High fructose corn syrup(a low-cost sugar substitute) is in almost everything that tastes sweet. It is a main cause of obesity. Check your labels...you'll even find it in spaghetti sauce. Contrary to old nutritionist beliefs, it's no longer a matter of equal calories being burned to those taken in. Not all calories are equal.
17 posted on 09/21/2004 4:39:59 PM PDT by A Navy Vet (www.opgratitude.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BattleFlag

Sex doesn't cause pregnancy either! (not)


18 posted on 09/21/2004 4:43:28 PM PDT by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BattleFlag

I'd say it's a combination of junk food and video games.


20 posted on 09/21/2004 4:54:16 PM PDT by dougherty (I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free. - Michelangelo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BattleFlag

Eating too much of these are linked to obesity, eating too much of anything without exercise will get you fat.


23 posted on 09/22/2004 4:46:48 AM PDT by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BattleFlag

I always thought obesity is more lifestyle related then eating. Like 30 years ago, people ate more and also they had more active lifestyle.


26 posted on 09/23/2004 10:20:08 PM PDT by Ptarmigan (Proud rabbit hater and killer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson