Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Shameful & Irresponsible”
NRO ^ | September 22, 2004 | Deroy Murdock

Posted on 09/22/2004 8:50:56 AM PDT by neverdem

E-mail Author

Author Archive

Send to a Friend

<% printurl = Request.ServerVariables("URL")%> Print Version


"Shameful & Irresponsible"
John Kerry plays politics with the war on terror.

If John Kerry's skin were any thinner, he would seem contained by Saran Wrap. Criticize the Democratic presidential nominee to any degree, and he responds as if gravely and unfairly wounded, even if he threw the first punch.

"The Bush campaign and its allies have turned to the tactics of fear and smear because they can't talk about jobs, health care, energy independence and rebuilding our alliances," Kerry whined at Cooper Union College in New York on August 24, soon after the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth began broadcasting torpedoes below Kerry's water line. Never mind that Kerry himself placed a mine downstream from President Bush's reelection juggernaut more than six months earlier: "The issue here, as I have heard it raised, is was he [Bush] present and active on duty in Alabama at the times he was supposed to be," John Forbes Kambodia complained last February 8. "Just because you get an honorable discharge does not in fact answer that question."

Kerry now cries anew, like a toddler deprived of his ice cream.

Vice President Dick Cheney told Des Moines voters on September 7, "It's absolutely essential that eight weeks from today, on November 2, we make the right choice, because if we make the wrong choice, then the danger is that we'll get hit again, and we'll be hit in a way that will be devastating from the standpoint of the United States, and that we'll fall back into the pre-9/11 mindset, if you will, that — in fact — these terrorist attacks are just criminal acts, and that we are not really at war. I think that would be a terrible mistake."

Rather than explain how his self-described "law-enforcement" approach would keep Americans from being killed by Islamofascists, Kerry nearly collapsed with the vapors.

"George Bush and Dick Cheney are engaging in shameful and irresponsible and outrageous behavior in trying to play the politics of fear and exploit the war on terror," Kerry

One could empathize with Kerry had he studiously circumscribed the war on terror as off limits in the presidential race. Of course, that's not so, nor should it be. The war on terror is the issue this year, and both Bush and Kerry owe the American people their individual visions for how they would crush Islamic murderers like cockroaches, at home and abroad.

Bush — agree or disagree — embraces his defeat of Kabul's al-Qaeda-loving Taliban and Baghdad's terrorist-nurturing Baathist regime. Bush also can highlight the Patriot Act, the Department of Homeland Security, and — by Heritage Foundation scholar Ed Meese's estimate — some 40 terrorist acts stymied by cops, spies, and soldiers before anyone got blown to pieces.

Kerry can point to...what?

The Massachusetts Democrat already has politicized the war on terror. He is no purer here than the gal on the street corner in high heels, Spandex pants, and smeared rouge who decries the salty taunt of her soon-to-be client. Just listen to Kerry himself:

"I believe I can fight a more effective, more thoughtful, more strategic, more proactive, more sensitive war on terror" than Bush, Kerry famously told minority journalists in Washington, D.C. on August 5. By implication, that would make the president's war on terror comparatively ineffective, thoughtless, random, passive, and insensitive. If this statement did not politicize the war on terror, what would?

But Kerry politicized the war on terror far earlier than last month.

Before eventually deriding President Bush for allegedly not internationalizing Operation Iraqi Freedom, Kerry insulted America's then-46 military, logistical, and diplomatic allies in that conflict. On March 13, 2003, Kerry asked members of San Francisco's Commonwealth Club, "If the federal government, my friends, can find billions of dollars in order to create a coalition of the coerced and the bribed, why can't it provide vital aid for schools, health care and law enforcement in California?"

Last March, Kerry adviser Richard Holbrooke conceded that politics played a role in Kerry's postures on Iraq. As President Clinton's United Nation's ambassador told Laura Blumenfeld in the March 7 Washington Post: "One, he [Kerry] knows that war is hell from firsthand experience. Two, he didn't know if you could trust Bush to pursue war as a last resort. Three, he was starting a presidential campaign and knew where a bulk of the primary voters would be."

"Home base for George Bush, as we saw to the nth degree in the press conference, is terror. Ask him a question, he's going to terror," Kerry said April 14, just two days after President Bush's prime-time press conference, according to Reuters' John Whitesides. "Everything he did in Iraq, he's going to try to persuade people has to do with terror, even though everybody here knows it had nothing whatsoever to do with al Qaeda and everything to do with an agenda that they had preset."

Kerry continued his criticism four days later on NBC's Meet the Press. "I will use our military when necessary, but it is not primarily a military operation," he told Tim Russert April 18. "It's an intelligence-gathering, law-enforcement, public-diplomacy effort."

Kerry even has used the Iraq war to raise campaign funds. In a May 7 appeal e-mailed to supporters, Kerry campaign chief Mary Beth Cahill wrote: "Over the past week we have all been shocked by the pictures from the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. But we have also been appalled at the slow and inept response by President Bush, which has further undermined America's credibility in the world and created new dangers for Americans in Iraq." She continued, "Show George Bush and show the media that you support John Kerry's stand: Donald Rumsfeld must resign immediately." The e-mail ends: "Keep the ball rolling: Donate Now!"

"John Kerry has politicized the war on terror at every turn, regularly abandoning his previous positions for a new, more politically expedient viewpoint," says Scott Stanzel, Bush-Cheney's quick-witted spokesman.

Kerry has every right to debate his differences on the war on terror with the Bush-Cheney team, so long as he takes it like a man when they return the favor.

 

     


 

 
http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock200409220942.asp
     



TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: deroymurdock; iraq; kerry; kerryiraq

1 posted on 09/22/2004 8:50:56 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Kerry's skin could not get any thinner -- and it is FAR TOO THIN for him to be anywhere near the White House -- a man who would broker our security, and pander to our enemies, for PEACE AT ANY PRICE.

IMHO, Kerry is a traitor to the U.S. as he continues to demonstrate by providing aid and comfort to our enemies in many ways.


2 posted on 09/22/2004 8:54:04 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Betrayed His Country


3 posted on 09/22/2004 9:07:00 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Kerry is a political eunuch and a traitor.
4 posted on 09/22/2004 9:09:56 AM PDT by afnamvet (Tuy Hoa AB RVN 68-69 NOT FONDA KERRY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

God, what a whiney baby he is. Does he put in for medals every time someone criticizes him? Or dares to speak out of turn when not recognized by Lord Kerry?


5 posted on 09/22/2004 9:25:15 AM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Just because you get an honorable discharge does not in fact answer that question."

Perhaps we should change tactics and ask Kerry to just release his "Honorable Discharge" papers. It might be interesting . . .

6 posted on 09/22/2004 9:33:06 AM PDT by trebb (Ain't God good . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Kerry for President of France!


7 posted on 09/22/2004 9:44:34 AM PDT by bicyclerepair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Good article neverdem. Thanks for the post.

As we all know this is the key issue for the election. So do most Americans. Fortunately the Rats, as a party, don't get it. Good news for the election, but bad news for the nation in the ongoing battle against Islam's suicidal cult members.


8 posted on 09/22/2004 9:49:02 AM PDT by LiberalBassTurds (Al Qaeda needs to know we are fluent in the "dialogue of bullets.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for posting one of my favorites; DeRoy Murdock is simply one of the best pundits/commentators/thinkers out there!

The saran-wrap reference had me giggling.


9 posted on 09/22/2004 10:36:50 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (In one holster is derision, in the other, disdain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

His botox treatments probably act like super glue to hold his thin skin together.


10 posted on 09/22/2004 11:05:55 AM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
His botox treatments probably act like super glue to hold his thin skin together.

Botox achieves its effect by paralyzing the local muscles.

11 posted on 09/22/2004 11:34:10 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson