I think Tah-RAY-zah would give more impartial coverage (and probably less delusional, too)....
Posted on 09/26/2004 1:36:10 PM PDT by jmstein7
CBS has announced that Rather will anchor the network's coverage of all three presidential debates, starting Sept. 30.
This MUST NOT STAND!
Rather, an exposed partisan, has absolutely NO credibility and should not be anchoring anything (except, perhaps, the weather report).
Tell ALL CBS Affiliates that Dan Rather is Unfit to Anchor ANY Debate Coverage!
You can contact all CBS affiliates with a single click here
Just click on the link above, or here, and you can email all 200 CBS affiliates with just one click!
Let them know that you will not tolerate a partisan like Dan Rather anchoring politically charged debates, crucial to this election -- in strong language. Warn them, clearly, about what you feel the consequences will be if they let a no-credibility partisan hack like Rather anchor.
And make sure all your friends do the same!
Rather BUMP!
Just when you think you've heard it all bump
Who will be watching?
Clearly no Freeper should be watching CBS coverage.
I thought Sheafer was hosting the third debate.
Another CBS blunder.
I think Tah-RAY-zah would give more impartial coverage (and probably less delusional, too)....
there is nothing that can be done about it except turn off the TV or change the channel.
This just shows how arrogant CBS is. Dont think you can change with with a letter writing campaign or at all for that matter. CBS will have to have its ratings fall so much so that sponsors wont pay big bucks for ad time and the company will go broke.
Makes no nevermind to me, I'll be watching Fox.
That is bullshit ..
Rather won't be the moderator, he'll be the dude in the studio telling us afterwards that Bush lost.
So9
Did Mine!!
I am shocked that you would let Dan Rather anchor any kind political debate after he has shamed himself beyond redemtion in the Bush National Guard memo forgery . You should be putting Mr. Rather out to pasture sooner than later for his incompetence in news reporting.
I wonder if Rather covers the debate and no viewers showed up, is it still considered coverage.
Won't work.
sw
LOL - I wouldn;t even trust Blather to do the weather report. He would just blame all the bad weather on Bush, and question the 'suspicious' timing of it.
Boycott CBS AND it's sponsors!
I'm with you,not worth the time and effort to contact CBS.
I'll watch Fox.
But it is nice to have a spy, always know what the "enemy" is doing!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.