Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A national retail sales tax? GREAT IDEA!
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | 09/24/2004 | Herman Cain

Posted on 09/27/2004 2:41:31 PM PDT by LowCountryJoe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 last
To: Willie Green

"Taking your logic to its conclusion, there is no way that a company could ever do a budget"

"Take a look at a corporate income statement sometime,
corporate income tax obligations are NEVER included as part of 'cost of goods sold'."

As someone who has been involved in the generation of many corporate income statements, I am more than familiar with GAAP formatting.

However, the format of the income statement has absolutely nothing to do with your main point, which is that income taxes cannot be predicted. To the extent that sales and expenses can be predicted, so can taxes. I know that to be a fact, since I have been personally responsible for generating many budgets.

Had I ever left out income taxes from my budgets using your wacky logic that they cannot be predicted, I would have been uncerimonously sent back to the drawing board.

BTW, there are many legitimate costs, such as sales & marketing, research & development, and general & administrative that are separate and distinct from COGS, also. Are you going to say that those expenses cannot be predicted, either? Or is it just taxes?


101 posted on 09/29/2004 1:03:24 PM PDT by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

Comment #102 Removed by Moderator

To: Rakkasan1
If we didn't have payroll withholding taxes and people had to make out a yearly or quarterly check, there would be a tax revolt, but since half the population doesn't pay any tax and gets a "rebate", they don't care.

Yep. And our elected bureaucrats feed off the apathy. Better our money in their pockets than our own.

103 posted on 10/02/2004 1:09:08 PM PDT by k2blader (It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #104 Removed by Moderator

Comment #105 Removed by Moderator

Comment #106 Removed by Moderator

To: ftlpdx

So wouldn't FCA establish a "singles penalty" and shouldn't the same people who oppose the marriage penalty also oppose this penalty? (FWIW, I oppose both the marriage penalty and singles penalty.)

That is pure foolishness, Why should two adults regardless of marital status pay a different tax?

Being married or not is a lifestyle choice one makes freely as an exercise of liberty. There should be neither penalty nor incentive to the individual as regards the exercise of that or any other right.

107 posted on 10/02/2004 4:20:15 PM PDT by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson