Skip to comments.
Good Riddance to a Bad Drug (Vioxx)
NY Times ^
| October 2, 2004
| ERIC J. TOPOL
Posted on 10/01/2004 10:14:28 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 last
To: NJ_Tom
CAD is coronary artery disease.
61
posted on
10/10/2004 12:35:36 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: neverdem
Does this mean I don't have to sit through that clam commercial anymore?
62
posted on
10/10/2004 12:36:46 PM PDT
by
Vision
("When you trust in yourself, you're trusting in the same wisdom that created you")
To: neverdem
Concerning Comment #34, I doubt the duration of the effect would be truly "permanent" - otherwise, a few aspirin would lead to irreversible bleeding problems. If the duration of aspirin's inhibitory effect on Platelet Aggregating Factor is particularly long lasting, it shouldn't matter when one takes a second drug - unless the second drug directly interferes with the mechanism by which aspirin inhibits PAF. Regardless of the duration of the inhibition, this "thinning" effect of aspirin would reduce the incidence of thrombosis-related stroke & heart attack.
Has the mechanism by which Vioxx increases the cited risks clearly been identified as an increased tendency to clot formation? -- or is its linkage to stroke & heart attack purely statistical?
To return to my original question, does anyone know how closely the clinical study subjects were supervised to ensure they didn't take OTC (over-the-counter) medications?
As I read the article, it implied a higher incidence of stroke & heart attack regardless of whether there was pre-existing CAD.
63
posted on
10/10/2004 2:04:21 PM PDT
by
NJ_Tom
(Machiavelli - mention his name in New Jersey and magical things happen!)
To: NJ_Tom
Concerning Comment #34, I doubt the duration of the effect would be truly "permanent" - otherwise, a few aspirin would lead to irreversible bleeding problems. If the duration of aspirin's inhibitory effect on Platelet Aggregating Factor is particularly long lasting, it shouldn't matter when one takes a second drug - unless the second drug directly interferes with the mechanism by which aspirin inhibits PAF. Regardless of the duration of the inhibition, this "thinning" effect of aspirin would reduce the incidence of thrombosis-related stroke & heart attack. Has the mechanism by which Vioxx increases the cited risks clearly been identified as an increased tendency to clot formation? -- or is its linkage to stroke & heart attack purely statistical? AFAIK, it's just statistical in a proprietary study that was looking for data that taking Vioxx decreased the incidence of colon cancer.
It took a long time to find an article. The second sentence states: "This prevents the access of the substrate (arachidonic aid) to the catalytic site of the enzyme at tyrosine385 and results in an irreversible inhibition of platelet-dependent thromboxane formation." IIRC, the lifespan of platelets is about 9 days.
|
About Entrez
Text Version
Entrez PubMed Overview Help | FAQ Tutorial New/Noteworthy E-Utilities
PubMed Services Journals Database MeSH Database Single Citation Matcher Batch Citation Matcher Clinical Queries LinkOut Cubby
Related Resources Order Documents NLM Catalog NLM Gateway TOXNET Consumer Health Clinical Alerts ClinicalTrials.gov PubMed Central
|
|
Show: |
|
-
Aspirin and platelets: the antiplatelet action of aspirin and its role in thrombosis treatment and prophylaxis.
Schror K.
Institut fur Pharmakologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universitat Dusseldorf, Germany.
The antithrombotic action of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is due to inhibition of platelet function by acetylation of the platelet cyclooxygenase (COX) at the functionally important amino acid serine529. This prevents the access of the substrate (arachidonic aid) to the catalytic site of the enzyme at tyrosine385 and results in an irreversible inhibition of platelet-dependent thromboxane formation. Aspirin is an approximately 150- to 200-fold more potent inhibitor of the (constitutive) isoform of the platelet enzyme (COX-1) than the (inducible) isoform (COX-2) which is expressed by cytokines, inflammatory stimuli, and some growth factors. This explains the different dosage requirements of aspirin as an antithrombotic (COX-1) and an anti-inflammatory drug (COX-2), respectively. Aspirin is the "gold standard" antiplatelet agent for prevention of arterial thromboses. The optimum dose of aspirin as an antithrombotic drug can differ in different organ circulations. While 100 mg/day is sufficient for prevention of thrombus formation in the coronary circulation, higher doses may be required for the prevention of vascular events in the cerebral and peripheral circulation. However, any effective antiplatelet dose of aspirin is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Therefore, the individual benefit/risk ratio determines the administration of the compound. There are no known prostaglandin-independent mechanisms for the antithrombotic action of aspirin in clinical use. Thus, platelet activation caused by other factors remains unchanged and might result in a resistance against inhibition of platelet function by aspirin. This involves platelet activation by shear stress and ADP. Additionally, there is no "sparing" of endothelial prostacyclin synthesis in clinical conditions of atherosclerotic endothelial injury. In this case, inhibition of COX-1 by aspirin will also reduce the amount of precursors for vascular prostacyclin synthesis, provided, for example, from adhering platelets.
Publication Types:
PMID: 9263351 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Show: |
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2004 14:25:05To return to my original question, does anyone know how closely the clinical study subjects were supervised to ensure they didn't take OTC (over-the-counter) medications?
It's methods haven't been disclosed. It hasn't been published AFAIK.
As I read the article, it implied a higher incidence of stroke & heart attack regardless of whether there was pre-existing CAD.
I believe the prevalance of all diseases mentioned increase with age. I don't believe hardly anyone knows that they have CAD until they're symptomatic.
64
posted on
10/10/2004 4:55:30 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: neverdem
Celebrex and Bextra are also Cox-2 inhibitors and may have similar side effects ...
65
posted on
10/10/2004 4:58:59 PM PDT
by
clamper1797
(This Vietnam Vet is NOT Fonda kerry)
To: Vision
Does this mean I don't have to sit through that clam commercial anymore? If that's the guy clamming on the beach, I guess so. Why, you didn't like it? I wrote it and got rich! /sarcasm>
66
posted on
10/10/2004 5:09:57 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: clamper1797
Celebrex and Bextra will probably get the same scrutiny. Cox-2 inhibitors may become orphaned drugs that only get prescribed after patients sign informed consent.
67
posted on
10/10/2004 5:14:57 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: neverdem
It was a good commerical, but there was something about it I didn't like. Not sure why.
68
posted on
10/10/2004 7:41:44 PM PDT
by
Vision
("When you trust in yourself, you're trusting in the same wisdom that created you")
To: neverdem
Personally, I never got much relief from either Vioxx or Celebrex. I have crohns disease, and one of the symptoms is artritus. Remacaid helped somewhat, but not enough to get me completely off of prednisone.
I just take prednisone for the crohns, and lots of ibuprofin for my joints.
Mark
69
posted on
10/10/2004 8:18:10 PM PDT
by
MarkL
(Power currupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. But it really rocks!)
To: MarkL
70
posted on
10/10/2004 8:53:39 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: neverdem
No, I missed that one! Thanks!
Mark
71
posted on
10/11/2004 4:00:03 AM PDT
by
MarkL
(Power currupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. But it really rocks!)
To: Doc Savage
I have a progressive arthritis, possibly connected to lupus, and when I took Vioxx, my blood pressure went up and I swelled up as well...went back to the old aspirin standby, and occasional use (one or two a week) of Ultram when it hurts all over.
72
posted on
10/11/2004 4:16:22 AM PDT
by
Judith Anne
(First we were digital brownshirts then we were pajamahadeen, now we're the piranha of the internet)
Comment #73 Removed by Moderator
To: carlrovefan
100s of millions I think..
74
posted on
11/10/2004 6:31:49 PM PST
by
wardaddy
(my noble timcat is in rabies jail doing a 10 day bit.....thanks to animal control facists.)
To: neverdem
Vioxx was my wife's salvation.
She is now on Celbrex, I am listening to lawyers say it is just a substitute for asprin or ibprofen. This is far from the truth. She started with asprin but when you start spitting blood you need another drug. Vioxx worked better than any drug that she has ever taken. Vioxx is prescribed by doctors for athritis. Obviously there are problems associated with the (Vioxx) drug but there are problems that it controls. She would rather die without pain than what she is suffering now.,
75
posted on
11/19/2004 11:55:53 AM PST
by
chas1776
To: neverdem
I took both Vioxx and later, Bextra before I had an unexplained heart attack while working out. Never smoked. Cholesterol 165, no genetic heart trouble in my family, not diabetic, run 4-6 miles a day.
I'm fine now, but very suspicious of all prescription drugs.
76
posted on
11/19/2004 12:20:42 PM PST
by
paleocon patriarch
("Never attribute to a conspiracy that which can be explained by incompetence.")
To: chas1776
I can see these Cox-2 inhibitors becoming orphaned drugs, but being prescribed along with aspirin and/or other drugs that inhibit platelet aggregation, i.e. drugs that inhibit the formation of blood clots. The risk of GI bleeding will be higher. Patients will have to sign informed consent.
Studies need to be done. IIRC, about 20% of the population are unaffected by aspirin with respect to platelet inhibition and the clinical benefit of preventing myocardial infarction("heart attacks") and the most common type of stroke.
77
posted on
11/19/2004 12:31:12 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: neverdem
Topol had a long rant about this published in the
New England Journal of Medicine just prior to the drug being pulled. Topol has been taking money from drug companies hand over fist for YEARS (even to the point of chairing TWO symposia at the same time at the heart meeting last spring).
I think he is assuaging his guilt with this holier-than-thou attitude and multi-rants on this issue. Just my opinion, I could be wrong.
78
posted on
11/19/2004 12:36:27 PM PST
by
Pharmboy
(Listen...you can still hear the old media sobbing.)
To: paleocon patriarch
I'm fine now, but very suspicious of all prescription drugs. I'm sorry to hear about your MI. Healthy skepticism doesn't hurt. There are benefits and risks with drugs, weapons, etc. Take care.
79
posted on
11/19/2004 12:37:19 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson