Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC gives Bush more accolades than FOX news

Posted on 10/08/2004 8:07:33 PM PDT by Froggie

Fox news' panel panned Bush's performance.....MSNBC praised his job tonight.....something is getting very curious, Alice !!


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; foxnews; kerry; msnbc; seconddebate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-297 next last
To: CatOwner

I've said it before, I don't know why someone doesn't pull together the "Talk Radio Television Network". It would be similar to what Imus does - televise a radio show. We wouldn't be able to get Rush, but there are plenty of other personalities that could be signed for a TV gig to air their talk radio shows.


181 posted on 10/08/2004 8:43:56 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: CheezyD

Of course if the "elitist" ones are doing the judging - they like "slick". If the heartland is judging - they like trustworthy.

Bush is like us and we identify with him. We will never identify with a Kerry. So - let the "elites" have Kerry.


182 posted on 10/08/2004 8:44:26 PM PDT by ClancyJ (Vote for President Bush - For our grandchildren. Democrats are not to be trusted with our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MarlboroRed

Despite his father, I don't consider Kristol a neo-con.


183 posted on 10/08/2004 8:44:52 PM PDT by aynrandfreak (If 9/11 didn't change you, you're a bad human being)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper
Fox has done this after Kerry @ his convention, the other debates, and now tonight.

Yes, I remember Brit said Kerry's convention speech was the best he had ever heard him give. And I thought it was terrible.

184 posted on 10/08/2004 8:45:31 PM PDT by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: sam_whiskey

I saw that too...the focus group in Columbus OH with Bill Hemmer looked decidedly pro-Bush, and BILL SCHNEIDER was actually leaning toward even-handed. But not too much, just a little, though enough to make me smile a little.

Then Judy Woodruff, from the debate hall, was shouted down by "FOUR MORE YEARS, FOUR MORE YEARS" as she tried to give her impressions. It was positively delightful.


185 posted on 10/08/2004 8:46:28 PM PDT by agrace (Liberal foreign policy ---> wartime president [R] = hitler, wartime president [D] = humanitarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Clink

Mort S*CKs...I told my wife that before the debates started...


186 posted on 10/08/2004 8:47:28 PM PDT by Hotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Yes, he never actually answered the question, which was, how will you insure that my tax dollars will not be spent on abortion.

Subsequently, the woman who asked the question looked very emotional and I think Kerry probably lost her vote as a result.


187 posted on 10/08/2004 8:48:36 PM PDT by agrace (Liberal foreign policy ---> wartime president [R] = hitler, wartime president [D] = humanitarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Williams
I am seriously considering dropping Fox. It was disgusting. Chris Mathews immediately acknowledged Bush won big time. Bill Kristol on Fox should be ashamed calling it a draw and "not good enough" by Bush. The President was outstanding from beginning to end. He took it straight to Kerry. Fox was deplorable.

I didn't understand them either, but screw them. I know what I saw and heard, and what I saw and heard was 180 degrees in reverse from last week. It was a rout. Apparently there is a group of undecided voters in a CNN focus group who agree. I'm telling you this third hand, but my understanding is that 17 went to Bush and the remaining three decided not to decide. That's a rout.

188 posted on 10/08/2004 8:48:43 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The Hollywood Conservative
The president came of as much more humble and much more presidential. He came off as powerful, strong, and passionate. If anything he could have toned down JUST a touch, but all in all, The president gave a reason to those people who wanted one to vote for him....

Well, the next time I am in St. Louis, I want to know what Starbucks the President went to before the debate. He was terrific!

189 posted on 10/08/2004 8:49:44 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: agrace

i agree


190 posted on 10/08/2004 8:50:06 PM PDT by kingattax (FreeRepublic leads...others follow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
MSNBC is trying to appear accurate. Fox is trying to appear 'middle of the road'. Nuff said.

BS, listen to your self. You only agree with MSNBC because they agree with you about Bush. I agree with you also, but that ain't the point, Fox IS doing just what we NEED them to do, put both sides out there and then WE can decide between the two and not have some wing of the MSM suck us back into the pack

I can't believe this thread and how fast everyone is to unload on FOX when they have given us just what we WANTED FOR YEARS.

BigMack
191 posted on 10/08/2004 8:50:25 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain (Nothing will hold us back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Kristol is still up McCains @ss and really doesnt like Bush.

---

yup. i remember during the RNC how Kristol derided bush for not dumping cheney.


192 posted on 10/08/2004 8:51:02 PM PDT by BoBToMatoE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: agrace

>I saw that too...the focus group in Columbus OH with Bill Hemmer looked >decidedly pro-Bush

As a Columbus, OH resident (Go Bluejackets! If the NHL ever returns...), I'm very glad to hear that and very sorry I missed it. I pretty much skipped all the post-debate coverage on all the channels tonight.


193 posted on 10/08/2004 8:51:13 PM PDT by Dan Middleton (Preparing for a long, cold, Hockey-less winter...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: kesg

I suspect that Fox News is so anxious to get Kerry on the O'Reilly show to boost their ratings and help them defeat CNN/MSNBC and now the regular broadcast networks that they have taken on a new and decidedly liberal slant. Perhaps this is simply a matter of overcompensation on their part as they try to prove to the other liberal media-types that they are really "Fair and Balanced".


194 posted on 10/08/2004 8:51:32 PM PDT by Froggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Froggie
Fox has decided to go for the lefty viewership. They will lose us, and the left will never like them since they were so demonized. I never watch them anymore.
195 posted on 10/08/2004 8:52:03 PM PDT by ladyinred (The simple lie always conquers the more complex truth. (propaganda))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

Fox has done this after Kerry @ his convention, the other debates, and now tonight. They are trying to expand their audience beyond conservatives, and this is a key moment when they can try to overcome potential viewers perceptions of right-wing bias.

--

The same thing that BOr is doing.


196 posted on 10/08/2004 8:52:04 PM PDT by BoBToMatoE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Clink

And Chris Wallace laughed with her. Did you see hear that little chuckle?


197 posted on 10/08/2004 8:52:11 PM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: modest proposal
also, why is kerry winning in the FOX news poll. That is supposed to be the conservative station.

One word answer: spambots. Ignore those online polls. They are utterly unscientific, and less than worthless. If you are a Bush supporter, ask yourself if you feel much more excited and enthusiastic about him than, say, after the first debate. That's how you know who real won, and what the real polls will say in a few days.

198 posted on 10/08/2004 8:52:44 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf

What disturbed me so much in the first debate was that Kerry actually looked good-his makeup was perfect and he did not look skinny behind the podium; I was shocked, to tell you the truth, because he never looked good to me before that first debate...so happy he looked dweeby tonight...


199 posted on 10/08/2004 8:53:05 PM PDT by daisyscarlett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Froggie

The next incumbent president that agrees to three debates should be disqualified as being too dense to be president in a second term. It is strictly a media circus, all the polls after the debates are now stacked by DU emails, there is no debating done only endless repeats from campaign speeches, and it gives the challenger valuable time to appear "presidential" on free air time. James Baker stepped into a campaign quagmire when he negotiated these disasterous debates. Bill Clinton only did two in '96, so at the most that's what should have been done this year. Now we have to listen to the partisan media hype yet another "Showdown at the O K Corral" until next week...gack!


200 posted on 10/08/2004 8:53:59 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-297 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson