I have one question about the husband. Was he unfaithful throughout their marriage? Or did he start cheating on Terri only after he had lost hope for her recovery?
I don't know, and I don't think it really matters here. What does matter is that the actions of Michael over the last few years are not those of a man who considers himself to be married to his wife. If a man were in the process of receiving a divorce and were openly carrying on with another woman, one could reasonably say that the man--though still legally married to his wife--no longer considered himself to be married; his actions, even if inappropriate, would not be hypocritical.
Michael, on the other hand, has openly flouted and effectively renounced his wedding vows. By his actions, I think it is very clear that he no longer considers himself bound by them. He claims to still be Terri's husband, but he sure doesn't act like one.
I have one question about the husband. Was he unfaithful throughout their marriage? Or did he start cheating on Terri only after he had lost hope for her recovery?
These are irrelevant questions in the court of George W. Greer. George W. Greer will yet receive the "Courageous Judge of the Year Award," I am convinced. Greer actually bases his decisions on "hearsay"!!!