Posted on 10/11/2004 1:20:57 PM PDT by Lance Romance
WASHINGTON -- The ''shock and awe" attack that toppled Saddam Hussein in three weeks is often touted as a brilliant strategy that defeated Iraq with relatively few US casualties. But new information suggests that the United States may have played into Hussein's plans for a quick war followed by a long guerrilla insurgency.
The report last week of the Iraq Survey Group, based partly on interviews with captured leaders of the secretive Iraqi regime, said Hussein planned to have his troops and loyalists pull back after an initial US thrust and engage the Americans under terms more favorable to the Iraqis.
The quick fall of Baghdad was once seen as vindication of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's belief in the power of smaller numbers of fast-moving troops. But recently, even President Bush has conceded that the early victory of the US-led coalition helped lay the groundwork for an insurgency that has claimed the lives of 929 US troops since the end of major combat on May 1, 2003.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
Hooah!
LM ;-)
I like your incremental approach.
For beheadings, I particularly like the refinement reportedly used by the 6th Cavalry on Moro juramentados. They, the terrorists themselves are beheaded and their heads sewn inside a hog carcass.
Enjoy your unclean feast of baby back ribs. No 72 virgins for you!
I believe that this particular dysfunction could be the very root of some of the islamist culture's problems.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.