Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just mythoughts

Exactly.

My point is that some choose to believe that the Gospels were written many years (75-200) after the Crucifixion. The best scholarship points to much earlier dates (35-65 AD).

IF the Gospels or epistles were written at such a late date, it would have been impossible to ignore the destruction of Jerusalem.


226 posted on 10/12/2004 8:48:55 AM PDT by Skooz (Any nation that would elect John Kerry as it's president has forfeited it's right to exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]


To: Skooz

"My point is that some choose to believe that the Gospels were written many years (75-200) after the Crucifixion. The best scholarship points to much earlier dates (35-65 AD).

IF the Gospels or epistles were written at such a late date, it would have been impossible to ignore the destruction of Jerusalem."


Could it be that there is a reason why tooooo many Christians have not been taught that Christ is the TEMPLE and are led astray believing that a building must be constructed?

Remember Christ's first warning about the sign of His return was deception. Now if most Christians are taught there has to be another temple built and that is not written then are they not following another Christ????


227 posted on 10/12/2004 8:53:46 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson