Posted on 10/15/2004 9:47:42 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln
It sounds like one of those Jeff Foxworthy jokes, doesn’t it? ''If directions to your house include what to do after you turn off the dirt road, you might be a redneck.'' ''If your grandmother wakes you up in the middle of the night and says ‘come look at this before I flush it,’ you might be a redneck.'' ''If you introduce someone to your brother and the father of your child and there’s just one guy standing there, you might be a redneck.'' You know the bit.
But this article isn’t about a redneck. It’s about Julia Boseman, a North Carolina Democrat running for the State Senate against Republican Woody White.
Julia Boseman, a New Hanover County commissioner, is a lesbian activist whose political agenda includes support for gay marriage and state benefits for homosexual ''domestic partners.'' She promises to be a big spending liberal Democrat, the likes of which North Carolina has never elected to its legislature.
Furthermore, Boseman, whose ''domestic partner'' is the coach of UNC-Wilmington’s softball team, has been a controversial figure outside her role as a public servant. Recently, she and her ''domestic partner'' had a baby, which was made possible by a sperm donation from her biological brother. When the couple (Boseman and her ''domestic partner,'' not her brother) sought to have the baby baptized in a local church, many in the community were outraged.
Readers of this editorial probably wonder why a race for a State Senate seat in North Carolina is the subject of a national column. I have a different question:
Why is the race between Julia Boseman (who, as of this writing, has 17 contributors in her county) and Woody White (with over 650 contributors in his county) even close?
The answer is to be found on the national website www.victoryfund.org. The site includes the following plea to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans-gendered voters nationwide:
''North Carolina is a Victory Legislative Horizon State, meaning that there are currently no openly LGBT (lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, or trans-gendered) officials serving in the State Legislature. In 2005, the North Carolina State Senate will begin debate on a Constitutional amendment which would define marriage as between 'one man and one woman.' Now is the time that we must elect openly LGBT (lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, trans-gendered) members to the North Carolina State Senate to protect our rights.''
The national site also includes the following criticism of Boseman’s opponent:
''(Woody) White has taken anti-choice stances and opposes any legislation that would allow gays and lesbians to adopt children and he would oppose any legislation that would allow gays and lesbians the same protections afforded to heterosexual married couples including opposition to any type of domestic partner benefits. He promises to 'resist any efforts by the liberal gay community to pass laws allowing adoption of children, public benefits for same-sex partners, or becoming a special protected class as that term is interpreted by the Courts.' ''
Finally, the lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, and trans-gendered lobbyists get to the bottom line: ''Boseman will need to raise in excess of $250,000 to be victorious in November.''
That is why Boseman, the Democrat, has raised more money than White the Republican, despite her paucity of local donations.
All across the country, gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, and trans-gendered candidates are preparing to launch a radical agenda in geographical areas where their ideas are not those of their constituents. They are influencing local elections by running highly financed national campaigns that depend on big money from donors who do not necessarily live in the state or even the region where ''their candidate'' is running.
But these candidates rarely talk about their agenda in public. They usually wait until they are elected to spring their true plan on unsuspecting voters. That is why Boseman’s website currently shows no picture of her together with her ''domestic partner.'' That is why her biography makes no mention of her ''domestic partner'' or the child they produced with the sperm donated by her brother.
Since the voters of North Carolina do not share their values, the Boseman campaign adopts a two-pronged strategy; First, buy the election with out-of-state contributions from New York and San Francisco. Second, spring the radical LGBT (lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, trans-gendered) legislative agenda on the voters immediately after assuming office.
Such a strategy can only work if the public is unaware of what is happening. I wrote this article because I want voters to make an informed decision. Regardless of where you live, you need to know if your local candidate is supported by www.victoryfund.org.
I don’t want to challenge Julia Boseman's right to use her brother’s sperm to ''father'' her child. Nor do I want to challenge her right to be openly gay. I just want her to be open and honest about her real political agenda.
Mike S. Adams called Julia Boseman's law office for confirmation of all facts in this article. She would not return his calls.
About the Writer: Mike Adams is a professor at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington, and the author of the new book, "Welcome to the Ivory Tower of Babel." His website is at: http://www.DrAdams.org.
Oh dude, love the new graphic.
Jaw dropping situation! God,what's next?
Now many, many years ago, when I was twenty-three,
I was married to a widow who was pretty as could be.
This widow had a grown-up daughter who had hair of red.
My father fell in love with her, and soon they, too, were wed.
This made my dad my son-in-law and changed my very life,
My daughter was my mother, cause she was my father's wife.
To complicate the matter, even though it brought me joy,
I soon became the father of a bouncing baby boy.
My little baby then became a brother-in-law to Dad,
And so became my uncle, though it made me very sad.
For if he was my uncle, then that also made him brother
Of the widow's grown-up daughter, who, of course, was my stepmother.
Father's wife then had a son who kept him on the run,
And he became my grandchild, for he was my daughter's son.
My wife is now my mother's mother, and it makes me blue,
Because, although she is my wife, she's my grandmother, too.
Now if my wife is my grandmother, then I'm her grandchild,
And everytime I think of it, it nearly drives me wild,
For now I have become the strangest case you ever saw
As husband of my grandmother, I am my own grandpa!
That is so F'n sick.
Why is perpetuating the myth that the woman's child is Boseman's? It is not.
It is her niece and nothing more.
.....it looks just like John Kerry".
More NC trash.
I hate to even ask this, but which one of "them" had the baby?
Her "partner".
I do not believe that it should be legal for homosexuals to use any means but natural to have children. In vitro, surrogates, and all other "artificial" manner of becoming pregnant should be beyond their use. It's not that I hate gays, I don't, but I do fear for the kids that are the result of such contrivances. These are people that are using the children from such procedures to validate their "Lifestyle". It's not what children are for. If gay women want children, they should adopt those who would be aborted.
Is Lincoln peeing on Edwards flickering light?
Well, I have one question: Why should the child not be baptised? It isn't as if the child had any choice in the manner of its birth.
And you folks in North Carolina can be assured that it will include more than just "Gay" specific issues. These people don't like guns and are gonna make sure they get yours and you don't. That's what they have done to California.
You've been warned.
You'd do better to "fear for the kids" who are being created the natural way by the dysfunctional lowlifes who populate our nations slums, public housing projects, and low-end trailer parks. There are a lot more of them, they are no more likely to have a clue who their biological father is, they are a much bigger financial burden on society, and most of them are in a lot more danger than the children of gays and singles who are using advanced reproductive technologies (who are a small subset of gays and singles who are having babies on purpose). Most gays and singles don't need to use any high-falutin' technologies to reproduce. They're no more likely to have fertility problems than anyone else, and for most the in-home "turkey baster" method does the trick.
Can you please tell me how two homosexuals can procreate? The "turkey baster" method that you mention by necessity must involve some third party in the "marital relationship", must it not?
Cordially,
It involves a third party, but rarely needs to involve high tech medicine (or any medicine, for that matter). And personally, I'd a whole lot rather see a financially stable gay couple or single person going the turkey baster route, than a drug-and-welfare-addict going the "not sure which one of all those guys I did it with is the father" route. The latter is a whole lot more common than the former.
I nominate your post #4 as Post Of The Day. That's the funniest, cleverest rhyme I've read in a while.
tuna bump...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.