Skip to comments.
From Baghdad: A Wall Street Journal Reporter's E-Mail to Friends (says Iraq is lost)
e-mail from a WSJ Reporter to his friends
| October 15, 2004
| Farnaz Fassihi
Posted on 10/15/2004 12:13:16 PM PDT by Maceman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: Maceman
This is the same type of propaganda used by the leftists during the Viet Nam war. It is meant to demoralize the American public, cause confusion and create doubt about the mission and the outcome.
Don't buy it. It's B.S. Even if the person that wrote it believes it to be true, it is one person's perspective. Keep the faith.
To: Maceman
And we should believe this person's analysis for what reason?
And it is OLD news. It's been posted more than once.
The genie of terrorism, chaos and mayhem has been unleashed onto this country as a result of American mistakes and it can't be put back into a bottle.
Yeah, there never was any terror or mayhem in Iraq before the Americans showed up. Sure, I believe that. And the opposition can't be defeated? Yeah, I believe that too. Would you like to see my deed to the Brooklyn Bridge?
To: Maceman
"Insurgents now attack Americans 87 times a day."Sounds like Detroit.
23
posted on
10/15/2004 12:26:18 PM PDT
by
Hatteras
To: Maceman
That's been making the rounds for a month or so.
24
posted on
10/15/2004 12:27:41 PM PDT
by
js1138
(Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
To: smith288
He is a she and she is an activist anti war journalist. This so-called e-mail is plastered all over the internet and has been spammed to everybody and anybody who even remotely might have an interest.
Dismiss it. Nothing but propaganda SPAM!
To: Maceman
>Being a
foreign correspondent in Baghdad these days is like being under virtual house arrest. Forget about the reasons that lured me to this job: a chance to
see the world, explore the exotic, meet new people in far away lands, discover their ways and tell stories
|
Who's the "reporter?" A war correspondent, or Private Benjamin?!
|
To: Maceman
How about a pic. She was writing about how awful Afganistan was as well back in 2001. Take a look at one of her earlier articles:
http://www.asne.org/index.cfm?id=4894
27
posted on
10/15/2004 12:30:01 PM PDT
by
Rightone
To: Maceman
Sounds like some parts of Detroit, LA, and a few other unnamed cities in the USA.
28
posted on
10/15/2004 12:30:28 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given US freedom of the press)
To: Maceman
If he can't leave his bedroom to do any reporting, then how the f*ck does he know what's going on outside? If he doesn't know what's going on outside, why should we believe him that Iraq Is Lost?
29
posted on
10/15/2004 12:30:52 PM PDT
by
0scill8r
To: ken5050
This is two weeks oldThat explains this then: criminal gangs grab you and sell you up to Baathists in Fallujah
I wondered if there was anything left of Fallujah for this to transpire. Two weeks ago there was.
30
posted on
10/15/2004 12:32:04 PM PDT
by
formercalifornian
(Daschle: "Never has so much clout" enriched the abortion industry)
To: Maceman
This is from a she, not a he, and she is an Iranian Muslim. Kinda like Nightline going to interview the communists in Vietnam to get the "real" story on Kerry's war record.
No, she couldn't possibly have a bias in favor of the terrorists. No, the DLC couldn't possibly have a motive for endlessly spamming eveyone with this diatribe. I guess it's just a coinkidinki that her "private email" wound up in the hands of the political enemies of our President in time of war.
31
posted on
10/15/2004 12:32:06 PM PDT
by
Phsstpok
(often wrong, but never in doubt)
To: Maceman
And yet, every time we hear from the troops, they have a totally different outlook than the media!!! The troops see hope and good news, just like in Afghanistan, but the media just can not acknowledge good news under a Republican President. I think we will see anchors choking and crying on Nov. 3rd when they have to say the words President Bush has been reelected!
32
posted on
10/15/2004 12:32:12 PM PDT
by
Woogit
To: Hatteras
Sounds like Detroit.Nah, they'll have much less voter fraud in Baghdad.
33
posted on
10/15/2004 12:32:54 PM PDT
by
RckyRaCoCo
(todo su paĆs es pertenece a nosotros)
To: Maceman
I read this weeks ago. This is old news.
34
posted on
10/15/2004 12:33:08 PM PDT
by
Chaos
To: Hatteras
Where does this figure come from? Probably the 87 billion John Kerry voted against after he voted FOR it.
35
posted on
10/15/2004 12:33:16 PM PDT
by
formercalifornian
(Daschle: "Never has so much clout" enriched the abortion industry)
To: Maceman
Imagine belonging to a party that thinks this is good news.
*Shudder*
36
posted on
10/15/2004 12:33:25 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(Bush has claimed two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
To: Maceman
I just did a westlaw media search of the wall street journal, and the terms "farnaz" and "fassihi" have never appeared in the Wall Street Journal. Sounds like a complete fabrication. Either that, or he's not a very good reporter to have never been published in his own newspaper.
37
posted on
10/15/2004 12:36:11 PM PDT
by
agsloss
To: smith288
smith288 wrote: This guy sounds like a total girly man.
Um, this guy is a girl. Nice to see you're so well read.
38
posted on
10/15/2004 12:37:27 PM PDT
by
wtc911
(all zee children have mush!)
To: Maceman
How many times are we required to read this article? I read it last week, is this some sort of Freeper haZing?
39
posted on
10/15/2004 12:39:05 PM PDT
by
petertare
(!)
To: Maceman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson