Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US to lose more than 400,000 jobs this year
Hindustan Times ^ | Saturday, October 16, 2004 | Press Trust of India

Posted on 10/16/2004 2:47:59 PM PDT by Willie Green

For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.

Washington, October 16 -- The United States will lose more than 400,000 jobs this year to India, Mexico, China, and other Asian nations as multinational corporations restructure operations and shift production overseas, according to a study.

The number of jobs lost will be around double those three years ago, according to the study by Cornell University and the University of Massachusetts for the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission.

The study came amid heated debate ahead of the November 2 presidential elections on outsourcing of jobs to India, China and other developing economies and its adverse impacts on employment at home.

White House aspirant Senator John Kerry has vowed to plug tax loopholes to discourage companies from moving their operations abroad to check unemployment, if he unseats George Bush.

The study released on Friday, projected that nearly 100,000 jobs would move to China in 2004 based on extrapolating data collected between January and March 2004.

"These data suggest that in 2004 as many as 406,000 jobs will be shifted from the US to other countries compared to 204,000 jobs in 2001," of which nearly a quarter will go to China, it said.

Production shifts with consequent employment loss had spread across the US economy and now affect sophisticated manufacturing industries, services, and information technology.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: depression; despair; eeyore; enditnow; gimmemyprozac; globalism; grapesofwrath; harvestofdespair; jobs; joebtfsplk; killmenow; outsourcing; sliceyourwrists; stagflation; suicidesolution; thebusheconomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

1 posted on 10/16/2004 2:48:00 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neutrino; A. Pole

ping


2 posted on 10/16/2004 2:48:42 PM PDT by Willie Green (Hawkins/Tonnelson in 2004!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

It's not easy being Green.


3 posted on 10/16/2004 2:50:24 PM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Will Kerry keep jobs here that involve industry that emits CO2? Or will he send those to China, since Kyoto doesn't include them?


4 posted on 10/16/2004 2:52:51 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Create 6 million jobs instantly - expell the illegals - they have to be working somewhere!


5 posted on 10/16/2004 2:53:13 PM PDT by Henchman (Kerry: No guts, No Glory, No way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

6 posted on 10/16/2004 2:54:28 PM PDT by atomicpossum (If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Correct that number by adding the huge number of jobs created by foreign companies moving their production to the USA. Car manufacturers (nissan for example and volkswagen)have brought thousands of jobs here. Sadly, ketchup bottling was not among them.
7 posted on 10/16/2004 2:55:07 PM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teletech
Now Hiring.
8 posted on 10/16/2004 2:56:39 PM PDT by Se7eN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
White House aspirant Senator John Kerry has vowed to plug tax loopholes to discourage companies from moving their operations abroad to check unemployment, if he unseats George Bush.

I guess this means that the "Hindustan Times" is a Kerry foe? Not that many foreign papers don't prefer Kerry, you know.

9 posted on 10/16/2004 2:57:48 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Se7eN

NO bull, no bias, no pressure.


10 posted on 10/16/2004 2:59:53 PM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Maybe this might be one of the reasons why U.S. is losing jobs. Caught sight of this article the other day.

http://smh.com.au/articles/2004/10/14/1097607335293.html


Google founders on hiring trip to India
October 14, 2004 - 10:04AM


"Google Inc founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin have said that some new features on the world's top search engine and other services will come from its research centre in the southern Indian city of Bangalore, where they are on a hiring spree." (More)


11 posted on 10/16/2004 2:59:59 PM PDT by focusandclarity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Washington, October 16 -- The United States will lose more than 400,000 jobs this year to India, Mexico, China, and other Asian nations as multinational corporations restructure operations and shift production overseas, according to a study.



Gee out of a population of 355 MILLION that will create 1.5 to 2 MILLION new jobs in the same 1 year period. Still beating the same old drum of Economic ISOLATIONISM huh Willie?

I have to wonder Willie, how come you NEVER post the articles about the MILLIONS of jobs new markets around the World create for American goods and services. It's called CAPITALISM Willie, ever heard of it?

Please explain to us Willie why you are so desperate to force your fellow citizens to buy goods and services from inefficient failing industries that produce at inflated prices?

Why are you all so fired eager for Socialism to be imposed on the American Consumer? Why do you want to expand the scope and reach of the Federal Govt into the private purchasing decisions of the Individual Willie?

Guess the words FREE REPUBLIC don't really mean much to you Willie do they?
12 posted on 10/16/2004 3:01:49 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Vote Bush 2004-We cannot survive a 9-10 President in a 9-11 World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

The question is... how can this trend realistically be limited or reversed without cutting off trade with 3rd world countries(which would send prices skyrocketing)


13 posted on 10/16/2004 3:02:01 PM PDT by Betaille (Harry Potter is a Right-Winger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Correct that number by adding the huge number of jobs created by foreign companies moving their production to the USA.

You're still living back in the '90s.
No such "correction" is necessary in today's economy.
Since Bush took office, Direct Foreign Investment in the United States has plummetted more than 80%.
Bush's policies have only made the United States a more hostile market for business investment.

14 posted on 10/16/2004 3:02:51 PM PDT by Willie Green (Hawkins/Tonnelson in 2004!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Link doesn't work. Is the story legit?


15 posted on 10/16/2004 3:03:08 PM PDT by rebel_yell2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

I'm inclined to agree with you... but the virtual end of US manufacturing will inevitably lead to a job crisis in my estimation. An economy can not last long that depends exclusively on services, and it will not create enough jobs to keep up with population.
The question is... how can we reverse the decline of Industry in the US without sending prices skyrocketing and cutting off sales to other markets.


16 posted on 10/16/2004 3:05:07 PM PDT by Betaille (Harry Potter is a Right-Winger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

*
U.S. subsidiaries of foreign companies employ 5.4 million Americans.

* U.S. subsidiaries support an annual payroll of $307 billion and pay, on average, 19.1% more than all U.S. companies.

*
U.S. subsidiaries heavily invest in the American manufacturing sector. 34% of the jobs at U.S. subsidiaries are in manufacturing -- more than double the proportion of manufacturing at all U.S. companies.

*
U.S. subsidiaries manufacture in America to export goods around the world -- accounting for over 20% of all U.S. exports.

* New foreign direct investment (FDI) in the U.S. totaled $82 billion in 2003, over twice the amount from the previous year.

* In 2003, U.S. subsidiaries reinvested $38.6 billion in their U.S. operations.

* U.S. Subsidiaries have spent $27.5 billion on U.S. research and development activities.

* For a list of recent expansions and investments in the United States by U.S. subsidiaries, click here.


17 posted on 10/16/2004 3:05:09 PM PDT by gogipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

We have the fastest growing economy in the world. Our growth this year's fiscal cycle is almost 5% while European Union growth was at 1%. Paul Harvey says the Bush economy FY2004 has unemployment rate at 5.4 % a few points lower than Clinton's figures in 1996. And Clinton wonks did not deal with 9-11; rather, Clinton and Co. set up 9-11 tragedy, Enron Adelphia SEC scandals, and the .Com bust. And who could forget George Soros destroying the Pacific Rim economies for his own enrichment.

Bush is the reason we're NOT IN A DEPRESSION. Only DNC operatives think we're in worst economy. Try trolling at the DU.


18 posted on 10/16/2004 3:08:42 PM PDT by sully777 (Our descendants will be enslaved by political expediency and expenditure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
wow there you have it straight from the hindustan news...
19 posted on 10/16/2004 3:08:44 PM PDT by arly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Correct that number by adding the huge number of jobs created by foreign companies moving their production to the USA.

Pssst! Insourcing doesn't count under the protectionist paradigm. Let's keep it between you and me. You know they will never admit that insourcing must also be bad if they were to be intellctually consistent.


$710.96... The price of freedom
VII-XXIII-MMIV

20 posted on 10/16/2004 3:09:35 PM PDT by rdb3 (How much are the Muslims paying Pat Buchanan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson