Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peter Jennings Admits He Doesn't Require Reporters To Be "Objective."
KETV / ABC-TV 7 in Omaha ^

Posted on 10/20/2004 6:28:43 AM PDT by MindBender26

KANSAS CITY, Mo. -- ABC news anchor Peter Jennings said he's getting an earful on media coverage.

Jennings is on a swing through battleground states, including Iowa and Missouri, where polls show the race could go either to President George W. Bush or Sen. John Kerry.

Jennings gets questions about a CBS report on Bush's National Guard service, for which CBS news anchor Dan Rather later apologized and said the story was a mistake. He's also asked about Sinclair Broadcasting's decision to air a controversial documentary on Sen. John Kerry's Vietnam war record. Another big question regards an ABC internal memo from the political director suggesting that reporters need not "reflexively" hold both sides of the presidential election "equally" accountable.

Jennings said the media is now under the hot lights.

"I'm a little concerned about this notion everybody wants us to be objective," Jennings said.

Jennings said that everyone -- even journalists -- have points of view through which they filter their perception of the news. It could be race, sex or income. But, he said, reporters are ideally trained to be as objective as possible.

"And when we don't think we can be fully objective, to be fair," the anchorman said.

Does the public think network news is fair? There are a number of opinion polls that show news consumers feel that the media does have a slant.

Jennings maintains those polls may be driven by groups with an agenda.

"There's a whole industry of conservatives saying, 'Ah, it's those damn liberals,' and a whole group of liberals saying, 'It's all those damn conservatives,'" Jennings said.

The problematic response, Jennings said, is the way people tailor the way they consume news.

"If you tailor your news viewing, as some people are now doing, so that you only get one point of view, well of course you're going to think somebody else has got a different point of view, and it may be wrong," Jennings said


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
If viewers can't expect you to at least try to be "objective," why else watch you?

If reporters can't learn to be "objective" in their 4 years of Journalism school, why go to such a school in the first place?

The notion of "fair" is beyond belief. Hitler undoubtably thought he was "fair" to the Jews and Gypsies.

1 posted on 10/20/2004 6:28:43 AM PDT by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

What a surprise. Jennings, Rather, Brokaw inserting their extremist Left Wing news into all their news stories.


2 posted on 10/20/2004 6:31:00 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Why should he hold others to a standard he doesn't meet.
3 posted on 10/20/2004 6:31:41 AM PDT by DOGEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

I'm shocked, just shocked.


4 posted on 10/20/2004 6:32:04 AM PDT by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Amazing... this is exactly what George Soros wants.. he must be gloating over this right now...


5 posted on 10/20/2004 6:33:31 AM PDT by tomnbeverly (Kerry will bring the Big Dig to Washington in the form of Healthcare becasue thats what liberals do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

These "journalists" , like many of our elected "leaders" are elitest snobs. They instinctively feed us "what we need."


6 posted on 10/20/2004 6:36:58 AM PDT by billhilly (If you're lurking here from DU (Democrats unglued), I trust this post will make you sick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
When will these f*cking idiot leftists understand that, by definition, NEWS must be objective. It is supposed to be a reporting of events that are happening.

When they stop doing this it is no longer news, it is PROPOGANDA and COMMENTARY!

7 posted on 10/20/2004 6:37:08 AM PDT by wagglebee (Benedict Arnold was for American independence before he was against it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly
Amazing... this is exactly what George Soros wants.. he must be gloating over this right now...

He's probably coordinating it!

8 posted on 10/20/2004 6:40:00 AM PDT by JaguarXKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
I think we can place this comment from Jennings under:

News flash!

DUH....


9 posted on 10/20/2004 6:41:10 AM PDT by thingumbob (Kerry/Edwards are sKerry/Leftwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Saying Objective and Fair is playing word games. No one expected Edward R Murrow to be Objective or even Fair when he was describing the Blitz from a London rooftop. You did expect him to be accurate. He did, and so did the BBC, accurately describe Britain's losses and report their statistics of German losses. What we get today from the media is propaganda masquerading as objective reporting. This is as much true of the NY Post as it is of the NY Times and Newsday. We find ourselves in a time warp to two centuries ago where the newspapers clearly stood with Federalists or Republicans

The thing I love about FR is that stories and articles are posted or linked in their original form and commentary follows. That allows a real exercise of critical thinking. Media folk like Jennings cloak themselves in meaningless words like Objective and fair when they are neither. And BTW FR provides an antithesis to his belief that people tailor their news to suit their opinions. We post and read all news and critique it using our knowledge, evidence and viewpoint. I dare say most readers and posters on FR are more conversant with the leftist point of view than most readers of Salon or DU, or ABC.

10 posted on 10/20/2004 6:42:31 AM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
These "journalists" , like many of our elected "leaders" are elitest snobs. They instinctively feed us "what we need."

With the primary aim of benefitting themselves.

11 posted on 10/20/2004 6:45:26 AM PDT by CPOSharky (JF'nK - Billionaire playboy, courtsey of a deceased Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

The MSM say's that the mistake that Dan Rather and CBS made on The National guard story was that they were sloppy because of over aggressiveness and overzealousness.

The point isn't that they were sloppy, it is that they would never have aggressively gone after a story like this against a Democrat.


12 posted on 10/20/2004 6:45:49 AM PDT by Peter Jennings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
"If you tailor your news viewing, as some people are now doing, so that you only get one point of view, well of course you're going to think somebody else has got a different point of view, and it may be wrong," Jennings said

TRANSLATION;“Limbaugh and the internet junkies are making us look like chumps. That 'friggin FOXNews is '$hittin in our sandbox! Lets get back the White house and close down the lot of them!”

13 posted on 10/20/2004 6:46:01 AM PDT by johnny7 (“Lick my ball-sweat Lady Astor!!” -Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

"I'm a little concerned about this notion everybody wants us to be objective," Jennings said.

Outrageous! My old J-school professor must be rolling in his grave. Yes, back then they still taught objectivity and if Dr. Morgan caught a whiff of bias or thought you'd sexed-up a story at the expense of the truth you got an F...no questions asked. He'd almost always lop the last sentence/ graph off a story because that's where the reporter's opinion usually creeps in.

Kerry's got his "nuisance" and now Jennings has got his "notion"...what a couple of elitist twits.


14 posted on 10/20/2004 6:46:35 AM PDT by WestTexasWend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thingumbob

From the Code of Ethics (Society of Prof. Journalists)

"Distinguish between advocacy and news reporting. Analysis and commentary should be labeled and not misrepresent fact or context. "

For more- see this site:http://www.spj.org/ethics_code.asp


15 posted on 10/20/2004 6:47:35 AM PDT by SE Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend

Surprise, surprise....It's not him and his other leftists journalists. It's the "way we ingest news" making it all of our faults. Another reason I won't watch network news.


16 posted on 10/20/2004 6:49:11 AM PDT by PersonEatingTastyAnimals ((For those folks who don't think you should be able to enjoy a good steak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
I can accept that everyone presenting news has a personal bias. Fine. State it up front and we can all listen to your news story with that information.

"I'm Joe Blow, ABC News. This report is presented through my personal liberal prism. I personally want to see John Kerry elected.

On the campaign trail today...."

17 posted on 10/20/2004 6:49:12 AM PDT by vrwinger (Need some wood?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Reporters don't have to be fair or objective...

Which means they can be unfair and biased

Meanwhile Jennings' is on a swing through battleground states'

Hey Mr Reporter....you wouldn't be campaigning for Kerry would you?

ABCCBSNBCCNNMSNBCPUBLICTVRADIO are all for Kerry....then all this advertising should be billed as such a price put on it...taxes paid on it....and Pres Bush demands equal time...

Propaganda isn't news and Jennings like Cronkite Rather Brokaw and all the rest are not reporters they are propagandists...nothing more...

and Marxists propagandists to boot...though their brown shirted ground troop colleagues act more like National Socialists...

It's amazing the Russia and Germany ever fought...they had so much in common
The Third Way resolves all those nasty issues...and coalesces both into one nice fat
Global dogma...

McCarthy was right...we are awash in them....no wonder they hated him so...
18 posted on 10/20/2004 6:51:11 AM PDT by joesnuffy (America needs a 'Big Dog' on her porch not a easily frightened, whining, Surrender Poodle...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

ABC (Always Believe Communists) needs to become intellectually honest and file as a 527 organization. Jennings "swinging through" battleground states? Please change to "Jennings campaigning for Senator Kerry through the battleground states".


19 posted on 10/20/2004 6:53:46 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Yeah yeah...and he's dumping mercury in the drinking water, dumping herbicides all the forests and plans to nuke Missouri, too.


20 posted on 10/20/2004 7:00:13 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PersonEatingTastyAnimals

Well, what say we give ABC's chain a yank...

E-mail World "News" Tonight at: NETAUDR@abc.com


21 posted on 10/20/2004 7:01:53 AM PDT by WestTexasWend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
"And when we don't think we can be fully objective, to be fair," the anchorman said.

Slanted, but fair - the latest MSM oxymoron...

22 posted on 10/20/2004 7:02:19 AM PDT by trebb (Ain't God good . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

Is Jennings a member?


23 posted on 10/20/2004 7:03:36 AM PDT by thingumbob (Kerry/Edwards are sKerry/Leftwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
" 'I'm a little concerned about this notion everybody wants us to be objective,' " Jennings said.

Jennings was one of those talking heads who refused to wear a flag lapel pin as a show of solidarity after 9/11/01, because it would ruin his objectivity.

24 posted on 10/20/2004 7:04:47 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
"And when we don't think we can be fully objective, to be fair," the anchorman said.

The end is hopefully near. They have been pretending that having 90% Democrats in a newsroom or university administration was of no consequence because they were trained to be objective. Hopefully this is a sign the cat will be officially out of the bag and even the nonpolitical savvy will see they are being manipulated.

25 posted on 10/20/2004 7:12:08 AM PDT by briant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
have points of view through which they filter their perception of the news.

We can lie if we want...relativism is killing our coun try. Go back to Canada Peter!

26 posted on 10/20/2004 7:12:30 AM PDT by ThomasMore (Pax et bonum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
the way people tailor the way they consume news"

What a whiner!

Isn't it awful that the audience can actually make choices these days about news they consume? Just about any choice one makes will no longer peg the meter to the Left as it did in the MSM heydays!

Too bad, Petah!

HF

27 posted on 10/20/2004 7:15:45 AM PDT by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Jennings, Rather and Brokaw no longer hold the franchise.


28 posted on 10/20/2004 7:18:33 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vrwinger
Agreed. But for me it became very easy to detect the reporter's bias as I got older.

The newsreader (Jennings, Brokaw, or Rather) would announce something along the lines of how people are hurting (almost always during a Republican admin) over name your subject etc. and now we go to Anywhere U.S.A. for a report about how people are hurting concerning whatever. The first person interviewed would be moaning and whining about something, many times mentioning how some cut in some gov program was hurting them. Then they'd interview someone from the admin saying the opposite.

Then the last soundbite would always be the original person being interviewed or some liberal or far-left hack who commiserated with the interviewee. That would also be the opinion of the network doing the "objective" report. Then the reporter would end the interview with a sad face confirming for everyone how the nasty, anti-poor, tax cut had hurt this average American and millions like him or her. And of course the newsreader would look thoughtful and caring as the reporter concluded his or her misinformation. That's how they've done it for many years and still do it on the Big Three.

29 posted on 10/20/2004 7:21:04 AM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Bump/ping for later read.


30 posted on 10/20/2004 7:22:01 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace (Michael <a href = "http://www.michaelmoore.com/" title="Miserable Failure">"Miserable Failure"</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftless
Bernard Goldberg's Bias discussed this approach to "reporting" in great detail. The thing was, it never occurred to the reporter to do it any other way. They agreed with the "hurting" person's perspective and presenting it another way was just out of their world view of reporting such things. But, I think, it is slowly changing based on all the attention it is receiving.
31 posted on 10/20/2004 7:30:01 AM PDT by vrwinger (Need some wood?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
"I'm a little concerned about this notion everybody wants us to be objective," Jennings said.

No wonder FNC's "Fair and Balanced" concept has taken off like a rocket!

32 posted on 10/20/2004 7:33:20 AM PDT by TXnMA (If your highest virtue is tolerance, then you have no others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Jennings, Mr. Canadian. He may be a U.S. citizen now, but he's still a Canadian in his thinking.


33 posted on 10/20/2004 7:35:50 AM PDT by Jenya (I'm a newbie here, but not to life. Don't even think of imposing your seniority on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter Jennings
The point isn't that they were sloppy, it is that they would never have aggressively gone after a story like this against a Democrat.

The non-story of Kerry's SF180 is proof of this...

34 posted on 10/20/2004 7:38:19 AM PDT by TXnMA (If your highest virtue is tolerance, then you have no others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Snippets of a quote found in Jaques Barzun's "From Dawn To Decadence" p. 684....notice the date!

"The main business of the Press, supposedly is news."
"....the newspapers print an awful lot of phoney news. News is what the Press produces. Most of the world's "news" is manufactured by the press itself...."
"A large part of the Press has in effect abandoned the pretence of dealing exclusively with facts." - T.S. Mathews (1959)

Beating a dead horse, I know. Old media has been dying for awhile, I'd say.

35 posted on 10/20/2004 7:45:23 AM PDT by 1john2 3and4 (Proud member of PAJAMAREPUBLIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Jennings didn't finish high school, so forget about 4 years of J-school.


36 posted on 10/20/2004 7:45:36 AM PDT by Cooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

37 posted on 10/20/2004 8:03:15 AM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population - have them spayed or neutered.©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

If you tailor your news viewing, as some people are now doing, so that you only get one point of view, well of course you're going to think somebody else has got a different point of view, and it may be wrong," Jennings said

Exactly. When the public caught on to the liberal slant--and found they had a choice with internet and Fox news--they voted with their feet, leaving the MSM.


38 posted on 10/20/2004 8:27:13 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Ok!!!! here is the reason the media keeps saying the country is so "divided." Because NOW they are being openly questioned about their objectivity by enough voices that are loud enogh to be heard over their propaganda. The "alphabets" (ABC,CBS, NBC) no longer have a monopoly on the news media. They no longer have the influence to dimiss those who disagree (alternative news sources) as "kooks". What we are seeing is a long overdue demise of their agenda.

"CRASH-N-BURN SNOTTY MEDIA ELITES!!"...your ratings are only going to get worse.


39 posted on 10/20/2004 8:35:45 AM PDT by Doberman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
"If you tailor your news viewing, as some people are now doing, so that you only get one point of view, well of course you're going to think somebody else has got a different point of view, and it may be wrong," Jennings said

Jennings is describing his own viewers.

Sanctimonious liberal snot.

40 posted on 10/20/2004 8:46:12 AM PDT by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
I'm a little concerned about this notion everybody wants us to be objective,"

DUH?!

41 posted on 10/20/2004 8:58:16 AM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
From the Code of Ethics (Society of Prof. Journalists) "Distinguish between advocacy and news reporting. Analysis and commentary should be labeled and not misrepresent fact or context. "

Exactly. A reporter who shows his bias or otherwise is not objective is not a reporter; he's a commentator, and should describe himself as such. I'm a reporter, and I would dare anyone who doesn't know me to correctly describe my political views by reading my news stories. Jennings, et al., couldn't say the same.

42 posted on 10/20/2004 9:04:29 AM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Heheh, I love the passage:

"The problematic response, Jennings said, is the way people tailor the way they consume news.

"If you tailor your news viewing, as some people are now doing, so that you only get one point of view, well of course you're going to think somebody else has got a different point of view, and it may be wrong," Jennings said."

Gee. I always felt better informed and more grounded in my beliefs when I got all my accurate news from ABC News.

BWHAAAAAHAAAAHAAAAA! Can you believe Jennings? The man believes he is a middle of the road moderate!


43 posted on 10/20/2004 9:09:44 AM PDT by rlmorel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I'm shocked, just shocked.

I'm stuned!

44 posted on 10/20/2004 10:38:01 AM PDT by talleyman (Treason is as treason does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson