Posted on 10/22/2004 1:34:34 AM PDT by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit
GENEVA People are plundering the world's resources at a pace that outstrips the planet's capacity to sustain life, the environmental group WWF said Thursday.
In its regular "Living Planet Report," the World Wide Fund for Nature said humans currently consume 20 percent more natural resources than the Earth can produce.
Consumption of fossil fuels such as coal, gas, and oil increased by almost 700 percent between 1961 and 2001, it said. But the planet is unable to move as fast to absorb the resulting carbon-dioxide emissions that degrade the Earth's protective ozone layer.
"We are spending nature's capital faster than it can regenerate," said WWF chief Claude Martin, launching the conservation body's 40-page study. "We are running up an ecological debt which we won't be able to pay off unless governments restore the balance between our consumption of natural resources and the earth's ability to renew them."
Populations of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine species fell on average by 40 percent between 1970 and 2000, the study said. It cited destruction of natural habitats, pollution, overfishing, and the introduction by humans of nonnative animals, such as cats and rats, who often drive out indigenous species.
"The question is how the world's entire population live with the resources of one planet," said Jonathan Loh, one of the report's authors.
The study, WWF's fifth since 1998, examines the "ecological footprint" or environmental impact of the planet's 6.1 billionstrong population.
To calculate the average size of each person's footprint, it measures land use, pollution, energy consumption, and the level of carbon-dioxide emissions.
The impact of an average North American is double that of a European, but seven times that of the average Asian or African.
Overall, the biggest culprits are the residents of the United Arab Emirates, followed by the United States, Kuwait, Australia, and Sweden. The least damaging are residents of Afghanistan, Somalia, Haiti, Tajikistan, and Bangladesh.
Rich nations tread heavily on poorer countries, said Mathis Wacknagel, head of the Global Footprint Network, a grouping including WWF. For example, Western demand for of Asia's palm oil and soybeans from South America has fueled destruction of natural habitats in those regions.
The study also warned of increasing pressure on the planet's resources amid spiraling consumption in Asia, led by fast-growing China and India.
"We can consume energy in a way that's harmful or in a way that's sustainable," Loh told reporters. The technologies are available to enable the world's population to live within the capacity of one planet."
Governments, businesses, and consumers should switch to energy-efficient technology, such as solar power, Loh said, adding that high oil prices may help focus their minds.
"It's not a question of how much oil is left," he said. "The question we should be asking is how much fossil fuel consumption the Earth can sustain. The Earth has a limited capacity."
OF COURSE the necessary food will come from highly efficient agricultural sources, upgrading inexpensive carbohydrates and proteins from corn and soybeans into high-quality fish products. And yes, this will cost a bit more than "free from Mother Nature". BUT, the overall lowering of costs, would, I would bet, STILL be great enough to end up significantly reducing the cost of the fish products over that "harvested from the wild" today. Remember--the cost of such wild harvesting is NOT zero----it takes a lot expensive fuel to prowl the oceans of the world.
BTTT!!!!!!!
© OFF-ROAD.COM
"You can't read the Constitution like a rule book"
-Bruce Babbitt quoted by the Arizona Republic, July 8, 1987
Pretty scary statement, eh?
Consider, that President Clinton and Vice President AlGore
laud the accomplishments of the 1992 Earth Summit.
Consider, that ALL OF THE MAINSTREAM ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
support the 1992 Earth Summit.
Of all the World Issues of today, the one that concerns me the most is the basis and aim of the present environmental movement. My concerns are twofold. One, that the leaders of the movement or, those behind the leaders are no longer geniune. In contrary, their goals are that of attaining power and domination over the world populace with the proclamation of impending environmental consequences and clamities as some dark future that only they and their values can save us from. Such arrogance! Secondly, I am concerned that the radical and often violent environmental groups such as Earth First and Sea Shepherd are backed by the mainstream enviro organization without bounds, perhaps encouraged... Please don't misunderstand me. I firmly believe the original vision of the environmental movement was very admirable. Basic, common sense rules for clean air, water, and toxic controls among others are all things that have enhanced our lives. In my optimism, I firmly believe that public awareness, and honest corporate awareness are the most simple extensions of human nature and good business practices. Both, perpetuate and enhance the orginal tenets of the movement. Without question, there is always the 1% that of any entity that abuses the privlidges of others. Unfortunately, the mainstream enviro movement to a degree, and their financed, radical arms explicitly claim this to be much more than 1%. Don't ever believe without question that human beings are the scourge of the earth and all business' are greedy, evil and heartless. This just isn't true, no matter what the Deep Ecologists, radical members of Earth First and other similar ilk proclaim. Through the following links and sub-titles I will present information that questions the radical and power oriented entities of the present enviromental movement. I will also, do my best to seek out information on good, common-sense enviromental issues, projects and topics. If you would like to email me regarding any of what you have just read please, do so as I greately appreciate your interest. If you have nothing more to say than flaming accussations of anti-environmentalism, save it.. I have heard it all.. Patrick J. Chicas, CEO |
Computer Videos, detailing Environmental Lies!
The Mainstream -
The Radical and Violent Factions
Animal Rights Extremism
Enviro Leaders and The Left Wing, Hand in Hand
Opposing Views on Todays Environmental Dilemmas
The Green Media and our Children
Private Property Rights
Opposing Views of the Environmental Movement
Laughing at the Malthus Whackos
Common Sense Environmentalism
Protecting Your Rights The Official RS 2477 Rights-of-way Web Site
Technology for the Future
Extremists on Usenet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search for: |
Let's Get Real....
Let me sum this up with a fine explanation via correspondance between one of our ORC Editors and a devote enviro activist and closet terrorist. |
......how about something that there is not a law for YET. How about the Wives and Children of those loggers put in mortal danger every time one of these idiots decides to get all weepy eyed about a tree. I guarantee you D. The tears of an Enviro Terrorist (Tree Spiker) over a fallen piece of future furniture PALES in compairison to the tears of a 5 year old child who wonders why "Daddy's never coming home". |
'Net Travelers have stopped by to visit this WWW site since April 11th, 1996.
To leave email for the Webmaster, just clickhere.
Click Here to See What Other Have Said
BTTT!!!!!!
He just might change your mindset on the "limited and finite resources" and "all technology is bad", luddite nonsense.
Enjoy.
Wow! Great addition. Thanks.
Zimbabwe is named as another country that is protecting resources for future generations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.