Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush signs $136 billion tax-cut bill with no fanfare
San Diego Tribune ^ | 10/22/04 | Terence Hunt

Posted on 10/22/2004 1:16:20 PM PDT by slimer

WASHINGTON – With no fanfare, President Bush on Friday signed the most sweeping rewrite of corporate tax law in nearly two decades, showering $136 billion in new tax breaks on businesses, farmers and other groups.

Intended to end a bitter trade war with Europe, the election-year measure was described by supporters as critically necessary to aid beleaguered manufacturers who have suffered 2.7 million lost jobs over the past four years.

But opponents charged that the tax package had grown into a massive giveaway that will add to the complexity of the tax system and end up rewarding multinational companies that move jobs overseas.

There was no ceremony for the bill-signing. White House press secretary Scott McClellan announced the signing on Air Force One as Bush flew to a campaign appearance in Pennsylvania.

The original purpose for the legislation was to repeal a $5 billion annual tax break provided to American exporters that was ruled illegal by the Geneva-based World Trade Organization. Repeal of the tax break was needed to lift retaliatory tariffs that are now being imposed on more than 1,600 American manufactured products and farm goods exported to Europe.

The bill replaces the $49.2 billion export tax break with $136 billion in new tax breaks over the next decade for a wide array of groups from farmers, fishermen and bow and arrow hunters to some of America's largest corporations.

The legislation also includes a $10.1 billion buyout of quotas held by tobacco farmers. However, a Senate provision that would have coupled this buyout with regulation of tobacco by the Food and Drug Administration was dropped by the conference committee that ironed out differences between the two chambers.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; taxcutbill; taxcuts; taxes

1 posted on 10/22/2004 1:16:20 PM PDT by slimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: slimer

I'd simplify the tax code by removing ALL corporate income taxes. The tax is just another element of the costs of doing business and is ultimately paid by the consumer through higher prices. Removing the tax element from the cost structure would automatically make our products more competive both at home and on world markets.


2 posted on 10/22/2004 1:24:16 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slimer

Great. This legislation contains special tax relief for Tennesseans. We will now be able to deduct our SALES tax from our federal income tax! TN has no state income tax.


3 posted on 10/22/2004 1:24:38 PM PDT by GailA ( hanoi john, I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, before I impose a moratorium on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GailA

Well, to be fair, it was written by Nelson (D-FL) and Dashle (D-SD) who are in desperate fights for their senate seats. I'll take their handback anyday, and hope they still lose. (Go Thune!)


4 posted on 10/22/2004 1:26:30 PM PDT by Maigrey (Member of the semi-naked blogger Political Operative Brigade. To H#ll with pajamas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I'd simplify the tax code by removing ALL corporate income taxes.

If you were running for Governor here in California, you'd get my vote Jim.

5 posted on 10/22/2004 1:38:01 PM PDT by slimer ( No pain, no palm; no thorns, no throne; no gall, no glory; no cross, no crown.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Any tax cut is good, but the current code is more complicated than ever, and includes favors for some, but not for others.


6 posted on 10/22/2004 2:19:45 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal Creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: slimer

why no fanfare ? tax relief during an election campaign is good news, no ?


7 posted on 10/22/2004 2:21:56 PM PDT by stylin19a (It's called GOLF because all the other 4 letter words were taken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
why no fanfare ?

I can only speculate about this but maybe to lessen the impact of the Dems to accuse the President of doing this only for political purposes. I expect they will spin this anyway and say that this proves that Bush favors big business. I respond to that with, the more big business has to pay the less business we're going to have.

8 posted on 10/22/2004 2:36:20 PM PDT by slimer ( No pain, no palm; no thorns, no throne; no gall, no glory; no cross, no crown.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson