Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why This Libertarian Is Voting to Re-elect George W. Bush
The Sierra Times ^ | October 23, 2004 | J. Neil Schulman

Posted on 10/23/2004 10:07:23 AM PDT by J. Neil Schulman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Still Thinking
the debate has been moved too far to the left. ..........it's considered a victory for a Republican merely to hold the status quo............Doesn't some positive progress have to be made as a floodwall against future liberal governments?

Absolutely. But how, pray tell, is a Kerry Presidency going to accomplish that? (And by voting "L" that is precisely what the practical result of your voting will be). Best to let the GOP "hold the status quo" while citizen-patriots actively attempt to move the debate away from its current (far left) position on the politcal spectrum. Politicians themselves are rarely (if ever) able to move that debate, only grassroots efforts and unforeseen events (like 9/11) can.

Former (big L) Libertarian Ron Paul eventually realized the futility of remaining on that sinking ship and is now a Republican. .......and he didn't have to change his views one iota to do it. Libertarians would be wise to follow his lead.

21 posted on 10/23/2004 11:06:13 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

I wasn't suggesting not voting for Bush, or even commenting on the issue as it relates to the presidential election (thus being a bit off topic, I admit), just carping about the assumptions underlying the argument. But I'll ask the corresponding question: How are these "citizen patriots" going to restore the issue to its proper form?


22 posted on 10/23/2004 11:11:54 AM PDT by Still Thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: J. Neil Schulman

I have abandoned my Libertarian affiliation because the LP's open borders/free trade position would transform our culture to that of a 3rd world nation through the ravages of outsourcing and immigration. Bush and Kerry also support relatively unfettered immigration and free trade, so I was left without any good choice. But I think it is tremendously important that Bush win with the largest margin possible to avoid a judicial coup d'etat by the Democrats and I will be casting my vote for him.


23 posted on 10/23/2004 11:12:25 AM PDT by TexasKamaAina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: J. Neil Schulman
Very well stated, Neil. I'm a small-L libertarian, but, I've never seriously thought of joining the LP. Their mindless opposition to fighting the War on Terror sealed it for me.

A libertarian government has an obligation to protect the lives and property of its citizens. The reflexive opposition to the aggressive pursuit of the War shows not only an abandonment of this libertarian value, but it also shows the Party as being no different from any other party. They've staked out a position simply because it's not what "the other guy" is saying. Right or wrong had nothing to do with it; only political expediency.

24 posted on 10/23/2004 11:12:33 AM PDT by Redcloak (Vikings plundered my last tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

I already told you, by grassroots efforts presenting their small-gov't, constitutionalist positions to electorate. It'll take time, but it's the only change we have. Voting 3rd party sure isn't going to do it, and it fact, will have the opposite effect.


25 posted on 10/23/2004 11:16:03 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: J. Neil Schulman
Well said sir. It is nice to find a Libertarian who lives in the real world. Thank you for your support of GW.

As an (little "i") independent these days, I have much to disagree with in the current leadership of the GOP.

However, GW Bush is the right man, at the right time, for the right job. Furthermore, John Kerry is the wrong man at any time for the job.

26 posted on 10/23/2004 11:16:40 AM PDT by ImpBill (America ... Where are you now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

change = chance


27 posted on 10/23/2004 11:17:59 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: crz

I typically avoid any and all Libertarian discussions since they so often completely ignore the facts that this author includes and artfully embellishes.

I will be proud to recommend this article to FRiends and friends.
.


28 posted on 10/23/2004 11:18:09 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: J. Neil Schulman

Wow! A Losertarian with common sense!

You can still be a small-'l' libertarian, Neil.


29 posted on 10/23/2004 11:31:59 AM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (John Kerry: the elite, effete, defeatist. Kerry should be President......of the European Union.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: J. Neil Schulman

Very good post. Bump.


30 posted on 10/23/2004 12:08:34 PM PDT by baseballmom (You Know Where I Stand - GW Bush - 9/2/04 We're standing with you, Mr. President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: J. Neil Schulman

This Libertarian has made the same decision as Schulman. Not all of us are theory wankers who believe that al Qaeda attacked America because we gratuitously went to war against Mexico in 1844.


31 posted on 10/23/2004 3:57:34 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: J. Neil Schulman
I'm unimpressed. Johnny-Come-Lately graces everyone with his fence straddling exhibition.

Libertarians, Libertines, they're all the same to me.

32 posted on 10/23/2004 4:00:31 PM PDT by O.C. - Old Cracker (When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crz
They all feel that we are headed into indentured slavery (communism) under Kerry and feel that the nation is more important than their party..

But Bush is pushing us in the same direction. Even his defenders only say that he's doing it more slowly.

33 posted on 10/24/2004 10:01:23 PM PDT by Commie Basher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher

Not with the NRST on the table in the congress. Bush has all but said that he would favor it if it gets voted on and passed.

Thast the number one issue that divides this country..Taxes.


34 posted on 10/25/2004 4:00:57 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: J. Neil Schulman

From one libertarian to another, Neil, where did you get the authority to appoint an agent to excercise dominion over my person and property?


35 posted on 10/25/2004 7:07:36 AM PDT by society-by-contract
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: society-by-contract
society-by-contract wrote: "From one libertarian to another, Neil, where did you get the authority to appoint an agent to excercise dominion over my person and property?"

"In truth, in the case of individuals, their actual voting is not to be taken as proof of consent, even for the time being. On the contrary, it is to be considered that, without his consent having even been asked a man finds himself environed by a government that he cannot resist; a government that forces him to pay money, render service, and forego the exercise of many of his natural rights under peril of weighty punishments. He sees, too, that other men practice this tyranny over him by the use of the ballot. He sees further, that, if he will but use the ballot himself, he has some chance of relieving himself from this tyranny of others, by subjecting them to his own. In short, he finds himself, without his consent, so situated that, if he use the ballot, he may become a master; if he does not use it, he must become a slave. And he has no other alternative than these two. In self-defence, he attempts the former. His case is analogous to that of a man who has been forced into battle, where he must either kill others, or be killed himself. Because, to save his own life in battle, a man attempts to take the lives of his opponents, it is not to be inferred that the battle is one of his own choosing. Neither in contests with the ballot--which is a mere substitute for a bullet--because, as his only chance of self-preservation, a man uses a ballot, is it to be inferred that the contest is one into which he voluntarily entered; that he voluntarily set up all his own natural rights, as a stake against those of others, to be lost or won by the mere power of numbers. On the contrary, it is to be considered that in an exigency into which he had been forced by others, and in which no other means of self-defence offered, he, as a matter of necessity, used the only one that was left to him."
-- Lysander Spoooner, No Treason, 1870

36 posted on 10/25/2004 9:09:42 AM PDT by J. Neil Schulman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MoJo2001

I love Neal Boortz. I listen to him most days, but lately his predictions Kerry will win have me so upset that I can't listen right now. He believes Kerry's party will do a better job of getting the vote out..voter fraud. If Kerry wins I will be sick!!


37 posted on 10/25/2004 9:26:29 AM PDT by EmilyGeiger (They that can give up liberty to obtain safety deserve neither liberty or safety. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: crz
Thast the number one issue that divides this country..Taxes.

I don't see how. Both parties spend like crazy, and that has to be paid back. Bush's spending will result in more taxes later, so I'm not too impressed with his tinny tiny tax trim.

38 posted on 10/25/2004 10:48:46 AM PDT by Commie Basher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: J. Neil Schulman

It won't take long for you to attacked by the demented authoritarians no matter whether you support Republicans or not. I see some have already done so.


39 posted on 10/25/2004 10:55:09 AM PDT by Protagoras (When your circus has a big tent, you can fit a lot of clowns inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
I'm unimpressed.

Don't worry, I've never seen a Freeper who was impressed with you.

40 posted on 10/25/2004 10:59:00 AM PDT by Protagoras (When your circus has a big tent, you can fit a lot of clowns inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson