Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fighters Escort Two Small Planes Away From Bush Rally
http://www.wesh.com ^ | October 23, 2004 | The Associated Press

Posted on 10/23/2004 2:43:45 PM PDT by sheikdetailfeather

Fighters Escort Two Small Planes Away From Bush Rally

POSTED: 3:48 pm EDT October 23, 2004 UPDATED: 5:31 pm EDT October 23, 2004

MELBOURNE, Fla. -- Federal authorities said Saturday two small private planes violated restricted air space over a campaign rally by President George W. Bush at a Melbourne baseball stadium.

Fighter jets escorted the plane to Merritt Island Airport near Cocoa Beach, according to the Federal Aviation Administration. The Secret Service has interviewed the pilot. FAA spokesman Greg Martin said further action is possible.

Reporters covering Bush's campaign event said the military jets drowned out Bush's words at Space Coast Stadium.

Earlier at a Lakeland event, a plane was escorted to an airport in nearby Winter Haven after it violated the president's airspace.

The activity in the sky repeatedly distracted the crowd from Bush's speechs.

Copyright 2004 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: bushrally; escort; lakeland; melbourne; planes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: FairOpinion

Oh Hargrove.... you got some splainin to do.


41 posted on 10/23/2004 3:04:03 PM PDT by Pajama Blogger (Pajama Power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather
Seems there's always some jackass in Florida just aching to get his wings pulled. I can't tell you how many times some idiot enters Kennedy Space Center's airspace during shuttle countdowns.

Naturally, these pilots will claim ignorance on the airspace violation, and I hope the FAA doesn't cut 'em any slack.

42 posted on 10/23/2004 3:05:25 PM PDT by Prime Choice (The Leftists think they can tax us into "prosperity" and regulate us into "liberty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SquirrelKing
A pie carpet-bombing?

BWAAAAAAAH!!!!

43 posted on 10/23/2004 3:06:52 PM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Some pilots choose to disregard them.

Then all of those some should lose their wings permanently. That'll serve as a wake-up call to stop screwing around.

44 posted on 10/23/2004 3:07:15 PM PDT by Prime Choice (The Leftists think they can tax us into "prosperity" and regulate us into "liberty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather
I'm wondering whether we have CAP in the Boston area tonight for the game.

We don't need any Air Canada flights making an unscheduled stop at Fenway......

45 posted on 10/23/2004 3:08:04 PM PDT by ninonitti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
To be ignorant of them means the pilot never checked nor did he receive an official weather briefing via a Flight Service Station which would have contained them."

Are pilots required to check such things before they take off?
I'm not being argumentitive, I honestly don't know.
The plane I saw on TV was just a piddly little thing, the kind I assumed could just take off or land on any grass strip as long as the pilot had a license. No need to check with anybody as long as the pilot stayed in the mapped space where such joyrides are allowed.

46 posted on 10/23/2004 3:09:02 PM PDT by Willie Green (Hawkins/Tonnelson in 2004!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jimthewiz

If the pilot was simply participating in Flight Following he would have been advised well in advance of busting the TFR. Instead He's flying fat and happy and out of comm with everyone. He will have his own personal TFR once the FAA yanks his ticket for a few months.


47 posted on 10/23/2004 3:09:47 PM PDT by Pajama Blogger (Pajama Power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jimthewiz

I'd hate to be on the receiving end of the ramp check those pilots received today. The FAA doesn't take it lightly when you don't bother to check the NOTAMs, nor should they.

I'd say a minimum 90 day suspension of their tickets is in order. They'll be lucky to keep their license at all, but at least suspend them for stupidity.


48 posted on 10/23/2004 3:10:15 PM PDT by datura (Let's roll? No, Lock and load.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
In my experience as a pilot years ago the presence of any kind of fighters flying CAP is a dead give away. Of course it is usually to late by the time you see them!
49 posted on 10/23/2004 3:11:29 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Frell Stark , this is the other side. I was hoping to go back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

Maybe those were the planes with Jesse Jackson, Corrine Brown and all the disenfranchised disgruntled early voters who got bullied and tricked and were looking for the complaint booth.


50 posted on 10/23/2004 3:11:41 PM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Pajama Blogger
Splash one Piper Cub. I repeat Splash the Cub.

LoL!

maintain your hard points, I repeat maintain your hard points, splash that Cub with your wash!

51 posted on 10/23/2004 3:13:39 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti

Thanks for reminding me of the game tonight!


52 posted on 10/23/2004 3:14:13 PM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: datura
I'd hate to be on the receiving end of the ramp check those pilots received today. The FAA doesn't take it lightly when you don't bother to check the NOTAMs, nor should they.

That has been a gimme for decades...

53 posted on 10/23/2004 3:15:22 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Flying becomes a drug to a lot of pilots and sometimes it completely overrides their brain. Maybe he should have made a run for it. Those jets really wouldn't fire on an unarmed single engine plane, would they?


54 posted on 10/23/2004 3:15:42 PM PDT by crazyhorse691 (I volunteer to instruct JFK on the meaning of a purple heart!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Watching replay on CSPAN. Sure is comforting to listen to this man. He makes me smile amid all the turmoil of headquarter violence et al.


55 posted on 10/23/2004 3:16:04 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (Goose hunt? Looked more like a snipe hunt to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

FOUR MORE YEARS!!!!!


56 posted on 10/23/2004 3:17:00 PM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

The sectionals from down in Florida are a real maze to start with, given the number of military airfields. That's even more reason to check for NOTAMs prior to taking off.

If you are flying VFR and staying within 25 miles of your departure location, you don't have to file with ATC but you still need to call in to check on the weather and be updated on those NOTAMs. NO EXCUSE!

I wonder if the pilots will be billed for the cost of scrambling those fighters? They should be.


57 posted on 10/23/2004 3:17:13 PM PDT by datura (Let's roll? No, Lock and load.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: debboo
>>>They should have taken them out<<<

Flying around they were adistraction.

Getting shot down and burning on the ground within sight of Bush's speech would have been less of a distraction?

58 posted on 10/23/2004 3:17:36 PM PDT by HardStarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

They are - I'm watching - So when does this happen - ?


59 posted on 10/23/2004 3:17:40 PM PDT by Pastnowfuturealpha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

>>>Those jets really wouldn't fire on an unarmed single engine plane, would they?

If the pilot failed to comply with instructions, yes, I think they would take it out. As well they should.


60 posted on 10/23/2004 3:18:10 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (At CBS - "We don't just report news - we make it - up.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson