Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: big time major leaguer
I am confused! We have an NBC report that the explosives supposedly "lost by Bush" were already gone by the time we first got to Al Qaqaa. But we have an AP report from earlier in the day that a Pentagon official confirmed that "U.S.-led coalition troops had searched Al-Qaqaa in the immediate aftermath of the March 2003 invasion and confirmed that the explosives, under IAEA seal since 1991, were intact. Thereafter, the site was not secured by U.S. forces, the official said, also speaking on condition of anonymity."

I think media embedded eye witness accounts, along with 101st airborne personnel trump an unnamed Pentagon official..
164 posted on 10/25/2004 8:19:07 PM PDT by TBBT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: TBBT

Could be one report is referring to to the high yield explosives and the other to the "regular" explosives.


169 posted on 10/25/2004 8:23:17 PM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

Give the NYT editor your thoughts on this crap.

managing-editor@nytimes.com


174 posted on 10/25/2004 8:25:07 PM PDT by spyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

Would you take a look at my post 204 on this thread. I'd like your opinion. I think we may be getting way out on a limb here, based on he way Miklasewski structured his report. Let me know what you think


210 posted on 10/25/2004 9:20:28 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson