Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/26/2004 8:56:01 AM PDT by m1-lightning
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: m1-lightning

Do you get the sense that we're gonna have to call out the National Guard for the next presidential election?


2 posted on 10/26/2004 8:57:32 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning
I'm sure that the Socialists will claim that this is nothing more than Reichstag Fires.

The MSM does not want to report any of this. Imagine if it was the other way around....
3 posted on 10/26/2004 8:57:43 AM PDT by Sociopathocracy (John Kerry would be Neville Chamberlain if we give him the chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning

This is an isolated incident.

/sarc


4 posted on 10/26/2004 8:57:53 AM PDT by GnuHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning

Someone has a list of these posted. This one should be added.


5 posted on 10/26/2004 8:57:58 AM PDT by cinnathepoet (Directly, I am going to Caesar's funeral)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning

Can someone provide a link to the Bush list? I'd like to send it to some friends.


6 posted on 10/26/2004 8:58:15 AM PDT by tdewey10 (The democratic party is on the verge of starting a new civil war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning

Isn't DIVERSITY wonderful!........


7 posted on 10/26/2004 8:59:34 AM PDT by Red Badger (Ask not for whom the Freeper freeps, they freep for thee........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning

It ain't gonna be pretty should we decide to push back.


8 posted on 10/26/2004 8:59:53 AM PDT by upchuck (Pajamas? I don' need no steenking pajamas!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning
The New York Times contributed to this report.

Why is the NYT a contributor to a report in Santa Cruz, California ?

Did they toss the concrete ?

10 posted on 10/26/2004 9:00:59 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning

We are Broken Glass Republicans.


17 posted on 10/26/2004 9:05:21 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning
vandalism at the county’s Republican headquarters

I'm not surprised... I've been in and out of Santa Cruz the last couple of weeks and didn't see a single Bush/Cheney sign, but I did see many Kerry/Edwards signs. There's a lot of good folks in Santa Cruz, they're just the minority.

It’s disappointing to think people are intolerant."

It's okay to be intolerant if you're a liberal. <\sarcasm>

20 posted on 10/26/2004 9:07:40 AM PDT by scripter (Tens of thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning
This from a town where the last issue they got emotional about was changing the UC Santa Cruz sports mascot to the banana slug?

-PJ

21 posted on 10/26/2004 9:09:48 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning

Bad title...it should be "DemocRATS strike at GOP Office"


22 posted on 10/26/2004 9:10:43 AM PDT by Heff ("Liberty is not America's gift to the world, it's the Almighty's gift to humanity" GW Bush 4/12/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning
Vote suppression can be explained by classifying the different efforts to undermine the vote into three categories.

Individuals who support one candidate and desire to suppress votes for the candidate's opponent can do so in a number of different ways. While there is no set formula for classifying acts of vote suppression, the following three categories help to distinguish the different techniques. Voters can be prevented from potentially voting for the other candidate
(1) by direct threats of intimidation
(2) by suppressing turnout through disinformation and scare tactics

(3) by efforts to keep the other candidate's message from being communicated.

Link

23 posted on 10/26/2004 9:15:16 AM PDT by Flyer (Prosecute Vote Fraud! [68%])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning

Santa Cruz is a vortex of 'rats. The authorities there will do nothing.


33 posted on 10/26/2004 9:41:42 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning

Dems is as Dems does ping.


35 posted on 10/26/2004 9:44:17 AM PDT by Mortikhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning
The Scotts Valley vandalism comes as the Bush campaign, citing incidents of violence at campaign offices around the country, is asserting Democratic partisans have deliberately tried to intimidate voters, potentially storing ammunition for future arguments about the fairness of the election

LOL, tactics plucked right from the Democrat's playbook.

More projection from the lovable sociapaths, kooks & loonies on the Left.

36 posted on 10/26/2004 9:46:14 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning

The article says "On Monday, the Bush campaign provided a list of more than 40 examples it said had occurred since July" but I can't find that list. Does anyone have a link?


38 posted on 10/26/2004 9:48:04 AM PDT by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson