Posted on 10/26/2004 8:30:02 PM PDT by Illinois Rep
What Kerry really means about the weapons facility missing explosives is the US troops screwed up. They didn't secure the weapons before the war started. Since the weapons were not there when the 101st Airborne division got there, Kerry's assualt on the military for failing to secure the explosives is once again a slamming assualt against the men and women of the United States Armed Services.
He betrayed his fellow soldiers as a young man and he once again has betrayed them by assaulting their performance in their march to Baghdad.
John Kerry is a shameful man who America must not vote for President.
Well said and I couldn't agree with you more.
So that I understand the dems, missing WMDs no big deal and explosives used for their dispursement are?
When it comes right down to the final analysis, kerry is attempting to put the blame on the President for failing to secure a single weapons storage facility. The fact that no one has yet proven the weapons were at the facility when the US forces arrived is not a relevant factor to kerry, the dnc or the MSM. But what is really absurd is having these groups place upon the President the responsibility for handling specific actions in a war. The President makes policy. The military carries out policy. Yet, kerry, the dnc and the MSM are implying the President should be overseeing each and every detail of the entire war. That is precisely what went wrong in Viet Nam. To paraphrase lbjerk, "Those men can't go to the latrine without my approval".
All of this "missing munitions" question is nothing but a story concocted by the IAEA, the kerry campaign, the dnc and the MSM. They were attempting to create a question to which the President could not respond just a week prior to the election. But again, they all overlooked the internet and how quickly people found answers that the media assumed would neither be asked, and definitely not answered. cbs and dan rather(gate) were going to run this 2 days prior to the election with the plan to give the election to kerry.
America had better wake up. dan rather is convinced you are too stupid to think and vote for the man he has selected to be the next President. He tried in 2000 and failed. He has tried again, 2 times in the last 2 months. He is going to convince you that only he knows who should get your vote. If you won't vote his way, he'll lie about the results and tell you that kerry won.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.