Posted on 10/27/2004 1:36:22 PM PDT by MNJohnnie
Exactly, algore. I had forgotten that clip that Hannity has of him saying, "He betrayed our country, he played on our fears".
It is going to be so funny if Kerry goes off the deep end like algore...HAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What Happened to Missing Iraq Explosives
Q. Why didn't U.S. troops make an effort earlier than May 27, 2003 to secure the explosives?
A. It appears that there were no orders for them to search for high explosives — only for biological, chemical and nuclear weapons. Saddam's alleged hidden stockpiles of these weapons of mass destruction were the Bush administration's justification for the war. The nuclear agency had warned about HMX in a report to the United Nations in February 2003 but did not specifically mention Al-Qaqaa.
I received the same reply.
This is the part that had me steamed:
"This story will, I am sure, continue to play out over the next several days. If The Times is indeed in error, that is certain to become clear, and I will say so in print."
Sure Okrent, like on November 3rd. What a lying POS!
That's exactly the one I got. Pathetic.
Yeah, sure. On page E-57, right next to the obits.
Either these guys at the NYT are the dumbest people on the planet, or they think we are.
The full conversion of the NYT to a laughingstock is now complete.
"When you last wrote to me, you said, "...you--and I--examine(about the explosives) each charge and countercharge very carefully, and examine the evidence fully before reaching conclusions."
Now, you're submitting a "flashback" about the explosives that constitutes "breaking news." I was right about you debasing our President.
Your policy should be changed from "The news that's fit to print" to "The news that's printed to fit."
I had a "flashback" revealing to me that NYTimes and you are really sinking in your own slime!"
These lying sacks of puke in the NYT, CBS, UN, Kerry campaign .. they think we're so dumb we won't be able to find out this information.
They are beyond disgust!
Synchronized Spinning
During the summer, the Kerry campaign claimed, without evidence, that the Bush campaign was illegally "coordinating" with the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. Now it appears the Kerry campaign is coordinating with the New York Times. Consider:
On Monday, the Times published an article (since largely discredited) claiming that tons of powerful explosives were "missing" in Iraq, and it was President Bush's fault.
On Tuesday, the Times "reported" that "Mr. Bush never mentioned the disappearance of the high explosives during a Long campaign speech in Greeley, Colo."
Today, the Times quotes Kerry as saying yesterday in Green Bay, Wis.: "What did the president have to say about the missing explosives? Not a word. Complete silence."
Meanwhile, yesterday the Kerry campaign released a new advertisement that prominently displays the New York Times' Monday headline.
The Monday Times article was partly reported by people from CBS's "60 Minutes," which is known to have coordinated with the Kerry campaign in the past.
One of the authors of Monday's Times piece is David Sanger. In July, Kerry told the Times: "I believe if you talk with Warren Hoge or you talk to David Sanger, you talk to other people around the world, they will confirm to you, I believe, that it may well take a new president to restore America's credibility on a global basis so that we can deal with other countries and bring people back into alliances."
The news media, of course, are exempt from the campaign finance restrictions on coordinating with campaigns. This column fervently supports that exemption, and indeed we think it should be extended to cover everyone else. But as a journalistic matter, it's bad form for a newspaper--and especially its news department, as distinct from the editorial page--to work on behalf of one candidate.
-- BEST OF THE WEB TODAY
WHERE IS NIGHTLINES COVERAGE OF THIS!!!!!
NY Times,CBS & Kerry: Conspiracy To Divert Attention From Bombshell Documents?
10/27/2004
Posted on 10/27/2004 8:11:50 PM PDT by notkerry
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1259525/posts
Why are the New York Times, CBS and John Kerry hyping a fraudulent story on the missing explosives? Why did CBS state the story would not hold until 48 hours before the election?
My opinion is they knew John Kerry’s presidential run was over when the following documents broke on October 26, 2004 if press and public where not all distracted elsewhere.
Documentary evidence was reveled on October 26, 2004 establishing that John Kerry worked with the Vietnamese communists while Vietnam War was still ongoing. The documents clearly state:
“The spontaneous antiwar movements in the US have received assistance and guidance from the friendly ((VC/NVN)) delegations at the Paris Peace Talks.”
The documents further state:
“Of the U.S. antiwar movements, the two most important ones are: The PCPJ ((the People's Committee for Peace and Justice)) and the NPAC ((National Peace Action Committee)). These two movements have gathered much strength and staged many demonstrations. The PCPJ is the most important. It maintains relations with us.”
The proof that John Kerry’s anti-war group, Vietnam Veterans Against the War, was working with People's Coalition for Peace and Justice is contained in an April 20, 1971 letter written by Kerry VVAW sidekick, Al Hubbard. The letter is addressed from the offices of the VVAW in Washington, D.C. and states:
“This is an appeal for help for the Peoples Coalition for Peace and Justice. Over the past months the Peoples Coalition has supported the Vietnam Vets Against the War in many ways. The Coalition has made office space available at no charge, and permitted the use of all necessary office equipment such as mimeograph machines, stencil-making machines, folders and typewriters. They have loaned us cars, bullhorns, and public address equipment. Their staff has taken messages for us and joined fraternally in building our progress. Now we can return this support.”
John Kerry has admitted that he met with leaders of both communist delegations to the Paris Peace Talks in June 1970. This meeting actually included Madame Binh, foreign minister of the Provisional Revolutionary Government (PRG) of South Vietnam, also known as the Vietcong. The recently discovered documents clearly state that:
"The Nixon-Thieu clique is very embarrassed because the seven-point peace proposal is supported by the SVN people's (( political struggle)) movement and the antiwar movements in the US. Therefore, all local areas, units, and branches must widely disseminate the seven-point peace proposal, step up the people's ((political struggle)) movements both in cities and rural areas, taking advantage of disturbances and dissensions in the enemy's forthcoming (RVN) Congressional and Presidential elections. They must coordinate more successfully with the antiwar movements in the US so as to isolate the Nixon-Thieu clique."
John Kerry completed his betrayal of the country on July 22, 1971 when he called on President Nixon to accept the seven-point peace proposal supported by the Vietcong. The FBI files even document that Kerry returned to Paris to meet with the North Vietnamese delegation in August of 1971.
See: John Kerry and the VVAW: Hanoi's American Puppets? Newly discovered documents link Vietnam Veterans Against the War to Vietnamese communists
http://ice.he.net/~freepnet/kerry/staticpages/index.php?page=puppets
Apparently the people at the NYT and the Kerry campaign are incapable of spelling really hard words .. like 'google' and 'yahoo'. Or perhaps JFnK should have just sat in on a few Intel Committee meetings...
"...that it has Kerry screaming about it..."
Becoming more and more like his followers, and like Gore, and like Dean.
Right out of the communist manifesto and Goebel's methodology.
A lie told often enough becomes believed. As if the screaming ofsets the falsehood, like telling it two or three times in one shot.
Weak denials will be plenty to deal with such questions. Those who could make the public care about such questions have zero interest in doing so. Otherwise what sort of co-conspirators would they be?
datum.
good catch, newsmax!
I heard that clip and he sounded like Al Gore
I heard it too. What Bush needs to do is run a commercial playing that clip, and then ask "Do you want this man's finger on the Nuclear Button?"
Of course...afterall, they have always shown the utmost interest in objectivity and truth, and always corrected stories that later were proven to be politically-driven lies...in print...big, front page headlines just like the original story they ran to deliberately mislead readers.
They should just start calling the paper the New York Enquirer.
He won't do that
But Rush, Hannity and others can have fun with it :0)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.