Posted on 10/28/2004 2:54:30 PM PDT by wolfeast1
the MSM really needs to give this up...
Im sick about hearing all this..
Will what ever end? AP articles on the Guard or Freepers posting the same stories over and over and over again?
No one gives a flying flip.
The terrorists want to kill us!
The MSM is getting frantic. Now they are recycling stuff. Next they start making up things again.
No, but that is the point.
While the press could care less about what hundreds of Kerry's fellow vets have to say about his time in Vietnam, and have tried to cover up Kerry's antics post Vietnam, any lack of documented proof of Bush fulfilling his NG obligations to the letter is considered to be breaking news.
"Somebody make us stop this madness!"
How long do you beat an "old horse." The MSM thinks you beat until it is beyond dead. No one cares! The AP is ridiculous!
I think this whole National Guard bullcrap will end after the election. If W loses, it won't matter for obvious reasons--the only reason why they're dredging this up is to try to influence the election. And if W wins, it won't matter also, since he'll be "safe" since he can't run for another term.
The AP is really on a roll today. Virtually every article they've printed attacks Bush in some way or another. They will stop at nothing to bring down Bush.
There are many questions about Kerry's service. Does the AP pursue them? No
I can't think of anything more laughable than still another dirty trick attempt on Bush's national guard service, but bring it on!!! Nothing will fire up the Bush base more, and I suspect even the most rabid Bush haters will wonder why in the hell Kerry and his MSM band, needs to drag this out again.
A BIG OLE DITTO to that!
| AP: New Bush Guard Papers Leave Questions (AP trotting out Bush guard story....again) |
||
| Posted by Technical Editor On News/Activism 10/27/2004 2:18:26 AM EDT · 42 replies · 565+ views abcnews.go.com ^ |
||
|
|
||
| AP: New Bush Guard Papers Leave Questions |
||
| Posted by stevek1 On News/Activism 10/26/2004 3:48:56 PM EDT · 162 replies · 4,943+ views AP ^ |
||
THIS IS BULL^*&% AND I am former USNR> Any RESERVIST knows that you only need 50 pts for a good year. This is the stupidist report of all.
FIRST...he did not need the pilot physical as his plane was being decommissioned (those fighters were no longer going to be in use) so he would not be flying. Those pilot physicals are "hurry up and wait" for a week, and a regular physical is one day. I skipped a firefighter instructor physical because I was not going to teach, I did not need it.
SECONDLY...He may have done extra duty drills at an odd time, or early. ALL HE NEEDED WAS 50 PTS FOR HONORABLE SERVICE IN ONE YEAR..GET IT!!!
THIRD....the MORONS in the MEDIA are not true Americans, most never served in Military, or are from Cananda and although they know the truth, they REFUSE TO TELL IT..LIARS, DECEIVERS AND A PLACE IN HELL WAITS FOR THEM.
FOURTH...we all know KERRY tried to get out of going during Vietnam when he was drafted, he applied for a deferrment..it was turned down. He joined the Navy, which very few saw Vietnam directly. Nothing brave about that BS, or shooting a lone vietnam teen in back trying to get away from US forces and unarmed.
FIFTH...as a Pilot Bush flew one of most dangerous planes available to him, and was on standby for Vietnam...it was not his fault he did not go, nor was he given any special treatment. Those lies were refuted by Barnes daughter who said her father lied to write a book and told her he never was asked to help Bush, nor did he.
SIXTH....Take this BS elsewhere I am tired of it, most of us here are former Military, military spouses, or Reserve...we know how it works, so you aren't swaying any of us with democratic nonsense.
A very weak October surprise that has been beaten into the ground.
Don't know how to link?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.