Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John & Ken charged with McCain-Feingold violation?
John & Ken KFI 640 AM ^ | 10/28/04 | John & Ken Show

Posted on 10/28/2004 6:59:39 PM PDT by lonewacko_dot_com

John & Ken received a federal complaint filed by the Dreier Campaign and the National Republican Congressional Committe(NRCC) regarding Political Human Sacrifice! John & Ken are asking all our listeners to contact the NRCC and let them know what you think about the complaint.

Mailing Address

National Republican Congressional Committee 320 First Street, S.E Washington, D.C. 20003

Damm those radio shock jocks!!! Phone Numbers

NRCC Main Number, (202) 479-7000 News Media Inquiries, (202) 479-7070 Campaign Assistance, (202) 479-7050 Information on Contributing, (202) 479-7030 Legal Compliance Questions, (202) 479-7069


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; campaignfinance; cluelessshockjocks; dreier; fec; firedreier; immigrantlist; immigration; kfi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-129 next last

1 posted on 10/28/2004 6:59:49 PM PDT by lonewacko_dot_com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

Presume this is immigration-policy stuff--as an east-coaster, I'm not too current on the deejay names.


2 posted on 10/28/2004 7:01:48 PM PDT by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

Drieir is not only desperate, but he is a fool. He is making himself and the whole republican party look like the democRATS.


3 posted on 10/28/2004 7:02:05 PM PDT by Nachum (Kerry spells "Fine Dining")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mach9

It is John and Ken from KFI radio on Los Angeles. They are reading the complaint on the air! Drieir is looking like he is pulling a Hillary.


4 posted on 10/28/2004 7:03:15 PM PDT by Nachum (Kerry spells "Fine Dining")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
John and Ken are idiots. This silly vendetta is going to cost their station a fine from the FEC.

Give it up, boys. Drier's going to win, no matter what you do.

5 posted on 10/28/2004 7:03:37 PM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Actually John and Ken are the fools.


6 posted on 10/28/2004 7:04:16 PM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mach9

The goal of PHS is to vote two pro-illegal immigration congressmen out of office to send a message that California is fed up.

One congressman is a Dem, the other is a Republican, David Dreier. The complaint is apparently on Dreier's behalf.

Anyone who votes for Dreier now should have their head examined.

More information on PHS here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1209691/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1251271/posts


7 posted on 10/28/2004 7:06:28 PM PDT by lonewacko_dot_com (http://lonewacko.com/blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

I think its John thats the fool...or more likely manic-depressive. I have watched them bounce from station to station in so cali for a number of years. Now I listen to them occasionally via the internet. I have reccomended John look into lithium several times.

But they do some fun stuff!


8 posted on 10/28/2004 7:09:11 PM PDT by Khurkris (Even from far away, some things are damned funny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mach9

These idiot DJ-s started a campaign against REPUBLICAN David Dreier, with the ludicrous excuse to use him as a "human sacrfice", and get a Democrat elected in his stead, that will show the Republicans, to get down on their knees and ask Ken and John, what they should do.

It is the immigration excuse, but the main problem is NOT Republicans, it's that there are too many Democrats elected, so Ken and John wants to elected more.

And their sheeple audience swallows this idiocy hook, line and sinker and want to throw out a good, powerful, conservative Republican Congressman, to elect an openly Lesbian Democrat, who is against the Iraqi war and against everything conservatives stand for.


9 posted on 10/28/2004 7:10:09 PM PDT by FairOpinion (GET OUT THE VOTE. ENSURE A BUSH/CHENEY WIN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
You are mistaken my friend. John and Ken have pointed out EXACTLY where Drieir lied to we Southern Californians about illegal immigration. He stonewalled the show, where as every other politition responded to it.

Drieir has acted like a contemptuous political hack who is trying to pull a Clintonian wordsmithian scam. He is a pig. His rating on illegals is among the worst in government and only NOW, that the heat is on is he responding. GOOD for John and Ken, and SCREW Drieir. If I lived in his district, I would be voting for his Democratic challenger to shove it UP HIS @SS!

10 posted on 10/28/2004 7:10:36 PM PDT by Nachum (Kerry spells "Fine Dining")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

So, you support what appears to be an abuse of the First Amendment?


11 posted on 10/28/2004 7:11:22 PM PDT by lonewacko_dot_com (http://lonewacko.com/blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

It's time those guys retire while they are still young.


12 posted on 10/28/2004 7:12:14 PM PDT by El Oviedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
If I lived in his district, I would be voting for his Democratic challenger to shove it UP HIS @SS!

You'd vote for a Democrat over Drier?

Deranged.

And, you'll be disappointed next Wednesday morning. Drier's not going to lose.

13 posted on 10/28/2004 7:14:05 PM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
So, you support what appears to be an abuse of the First Amendment?

I support anything that makes John and Ken look like the idiots they are.

14 posted on 10/28/2004 7:14:45 PM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

DO YOU KNOW WHO DREIER's OPPONENT IS, who would be elected, if Dreier loses?


About Cynthia Matthews
http://www.matthews4congress.com/about.html

" I will support environmental conservation efforts to preserve our natural resources and fight for our children’s right to quality education. I will defend a woman’s right to choose. I will protect rights for gays, lesbians, transgender, transsexual and bisexual persons. I will protect the rights of handicap persons. I will protect senior citizen’s right to access adequate and quality health care, which is of the utmost importance."

===

Matthews opposes the war in Iraq, saying "the reasons for going into war in my opinion were unfounded. No weapons of mass destruction have been found and Iraq has never posed an imminent threat to the U.S."

http://asp.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/CandidateProfile.aspx?ci=7801&oi=H



15 posted on 10/28/2004 7:15:52 PM PDT by FairOpinion (GET OUT THE VOTE. ENSURE A BUSH/CHENEY WIN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster; HiJinx

ping


16 posted on 10/28/2004 7:19:49 PM PDT by lonewacko_dot_com (http://lonewacko.com/blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

DO YOU KNOW WHO DREIER's OPPONENT IS, who would be elected, if Dreier loses?


About Cynthia Matthews
http://www.matthews4congress.com/about.html

" I will support environmental conservation efforts to preserve our natural resources and fight for our children’s right to quality education. I will defend a woman’s right to choose. I will protect rights for gays, lesbians, transgender, transsexual and bisexual persons. I will protect the rights of handicap persons. I will protect senior citizen’s right to access adequate and quality health care, which is of the utmost importance."

===



17 posted on 10/28/2004 7:19:53 PM PDT by FairOpinion (GET OUT THE VOTE. ENSURE A BUSH/CHENEY WIN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
This kind of thinking explains the 12% of the people here at FR, who plan to vote for Kerry. ======

Free Republic Home | Forum | Pings | Mail | More ...


Question ...

Last chance poll: Who gets your vote?

Michael Badnarik
671 votes - 3% (217 member votes - 1%)



George W. Bush
15,783 votes - 80% (7,097 member votes - 36%)



John F. Kerry
2,455 votes - 12% (241 member votes - 1%)



Ralph Nader
152 votes - 0% (51 member votes - 0%)



Michael A. Peroutka
459 votes - 2% (195 member votes - 0%)



Other
69 votes - 0% (36 member votes - 0%)



Undecided/Pass
124 votes - 0% (82 member votes - 0%)


19,713 votes total; you voted "George W. Bush"



Top of Page


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2003 Robinson-DeFehr Consulting, LLC.

18 posted on 10/28/2004 7:22:57 PM PDT by FairOpinion (GET OUT THE VOTE. ENSURE A BUSH/CHENEY WIN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

I agree. I can't stand to listen to them. I listen to Michael Medved and Hugh Hewitt after him.

John


19 posted on 10/28/2004 7:24:48 PM PDT by John_7Diamonds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

I heard a little bit of their show tonite, it in a clear channel and you can hear it 340 miles away. I agree, they are idiots, humping for ratings. Thankfully they give way to the genius that is Phil Hendrie.


20 posted on 10/28/2004 7:25:32 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Laugh While You Can, Monkey-Boy!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

Oh Yeah, let's replace him with a liberal Democrat.


21 posted on 10/28/2004 7:28:33 PM PDT by rushmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

Dittos


22 posted on 10/28/2004 7:29:36 PM PDT by Stars N Stripes (God Bless America and God Bless GWB !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
You'd vote for a Democrat over Drier?
Deranged.
And, you'll be disappointed next Wednesday morning. Drier's not going to lose.

I've got news for you. On illegal immigration, the Republicans have hurt us as much as the Democrats have. What sacred law makes free minded people force themselves to vote a straight party line? When there are bad Republicans, they NEED TO GO. Drieir has spit in our faces. Did you hear the complaint as it was read on the air? Did you realize what Drieir is trying to pull? Ever hear of the first amendment? Hey, what's next- goons busting up John and Ken outside the studio?

Hey, I expect that from the Michael Moores of the world, but not from the California Republican Party. He is an entrenched political hack who no longer listens to his electorate.

SO WHAT if he is re-elected, he has been forced to respond to the problem of illegals for the first time in his carreer. If he is not re-elected, GOOD, let's give his challenger a chance to set things straight. If not, she's next.

John and Ken are right, this has been the only way to get the politicians, left or right to respond. I am sorry, I cannot get too exited about his challenger's stupid liberal agenda when California is drowning in a sea of illegals. It is the only message that has worked to get the Republicans to respond.

23 posted on 10/28/2004 7:30:52 PM PDT by Nachum (Kerry spells "Fine Dining")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

John and Ken are the idiots - stopped listening to them ever since they began this crusade to destroy Dreier.


24 posted on 10/28/2004 7:32:29 PM PDT by jporcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stars N Stripes

They are pretty bad, for a while there, Hendrie did a scathing impersonation of their show.


25 posted on 10/28/2004 7:34:35 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Laugh While You Can, Monkey-Boy!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

I missed that, when was it? I'm registered on his site and can find the archive. I gotta hear that!


26 posted on 10/28/2004 7:36:36 PM PDT by Stars N Stripes (God Bless America and God Bless GWB !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Your the idiot. Drier will go down. The issue of immigration is the hidden political monster in California. Yes, dems control the show at the capital, but Arnald was elect because of the driver licenses for illegals bill that signed by Grey Davis. ALSO... Bush wouldn't be fighting so hard for reelection if it wasn't for the Mexican Guest Worker Program he proposed earlier this year. The money flowing from California Republicans slowed to President Bush, because of the anger all over the immigration issue. John and Ken are just riding on a fast moving angry horse. Californians are pissed off at the dems, Bush, the national Republicans, because nobody helping us stem the flow of illegals. This is not about party, this is about the future of our state. Drier will be pushed aside and so will others until the immigration laws are enforced.


27 posted on 10/28/2004 7:44:24 PM PDT by LiveFreeorDieNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
If I lived in his district, I would be voting for his Democratic challenger to shove it UP HIS @SS!

Let me tell you something' pal, I LIVE in David's district (Monrovia to be precise) and while I do not agree with him 100%, he did a whole lot of good for our district he is representing.

I have written to his office many time expressing my displeasure with some of his positions and he replied in kind and in person, explaining the reasons behind his voting record.

Those two KFI clowns especially John are out for ratings and the more controversial the better.
You on the other hand should butt out, 'cause you do not know what the hell you're talking about. >

28 posted on 10/28/2004 7:46:38 PM PDT by danmar ("Reason obeys itself, and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Right On, Brother!


29 posted on 10/28/2004 7:48:56 PM PDT by LiveFreeorDieNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeorDieNow
Drier will go down

$100 to Free Republic says he doesn't.

Are you all talk, or you care to put your money where your mouth is?

I must caution you; I've already helped put $100 in the FR coffers on the Bill O'Reilly settlement. This very night.

30 posted on 10/28/2004 7:48:57 PM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

these guys have truly become the lamest of the lame


31 posted on 10/28/2004 7:50:06 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeorDieNow
You Said: "...This is not about party, this is about the future of our state."

Response: YOU ARE WRONG!

Comment: It is about our country.

32 posted on 10/28/2004 7:50:41 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
This kind of thinking explains the 12% of the people here at FR, who plan to vote for Kerry.

*kof* Those FR non-member votes.

33 posted on 10/28/2004 7:51:22 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1 (Lock-n-load!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Anyone stupid enough to vote for someone with an R after their name, no matter what they stood for, their record or their morals deserves the ridicule that they are looked upon with from people who actually care about the Country, not just voting in Republicans, even if they are really democrats with a little r after their name.


34 posted on 10/28/2004 7:54:02 PM PDT by LaraCroft (If the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, do the stupid get stupider?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mach9

If this is the same John & Ken that I think it is : they were in NJ for awhile & many gave them credit for the "Dump Florio" campaign ( it was successful ) . At the time, it was kind of a novelty to have radio jocks take such an interest in the political scene ( they were supposed to be "entertainment" ) but the Flim Flam Florio movement got momentum & steamrollered him ( & many of his Dem flunkies ) out of office. Looks like more of the same - different coast - different party - but it was ALWAYS all about John & Ken ( in their mind anyway ).


35 posted on 10/28/2004 7:54:37 PM PDT by bioprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LaraCroft
Anyone stupid enough to vote for someone with an R after their name, no matter what they stood for, their record or their morals deserves the ridicule that they are looked upon with from people who actually care about the Country, not just voting in Republicans, even if they are really democrats with a little r after their name.

Why should I listen to someone who can't formulate a coherent sentence?

36 posted on 10/28/2004 7:59:15 PM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
I am inviting, and WANT, an FEC complaint against my anti-Kerry and anti-FEC ad. But I cannot raise a complaint from the Democrats unless I can GET IT ON AIR.

If poking both Kerry and the FEC in the nose, figuratively speaking of course, then click below. Visit the FR tread, and do what you choose to help this happen.

Congressman Billybob

Click for latest, "The Anti-Kerry, Anti-CFR Ad"

37 posted on 10/28/2004 8:10:19 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danmar
I have written to his office many time expressing my displeasure with some of his positions and he replied in kind and in person, explaining the reasons behind his voting record.

Those two KFI clowns especially John are out for ratings and the more controversial the better. You on the other hand should butt out, 'cause you do not know what the hell you're talking about.

I live in and I have written to Henry Waxman's office and actually had a sit down chat with him about socialized medicine. He was "nice" too, so what? He went and stabbed me in the back after his "nice" talk anyway. That is their business, most of our local politicians respond to their districts in a polite way.

OK "pal, how many illegals have moved into and changed the life in Monrovia during Drieir's term in office? Don't you think that Drieir's policies have an affect on Los Angeles? Remember his campaign against Sonny Sardo? I remember it well. Here is an interesting thread on it:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-rlc/1087967/posts

Sardo said the exact same thing John and Ken are saying- He had the support of the Republican Assembly in Monrovia. Sorry,I live too close to you to say that it does not affect me. When he reacts with new legislation as a response to this pressure, it directly affects me.

I will NOT butt out. Thank you very much.

38 posted on 10/28/2004 8:11:50 PM PDT by Nachum (Kerry spells "Fine Dining")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 4.1O dana super trac pak; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ...

ping


39 posted on 10/28/2004 8:20:22 PM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

They are as bad as the wacko that follows them. He and his (wife of a famous talk show host) keep ruining Rush's show with their bogus diet ads. But the wacko started off saying it was an anti-diet drug that his wife and son were taking. Thought his wife wanted to look like Rosie, and his son had an ambition to look like michael moore.


40 posted on 10/28/2004 8:27:18 PM PDT by stumpy (M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Nice to see you're so blase about an elected official suppressing free speech. I guess an R after the name means that rules just don't apply, huh?
41 posted on 10/28/2004 8:27:36 PM PDT by radicalamericannationalist (Kurtz had the right answer but the wrong location.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: radicalamericannationalist
Nice to see you're so blase about an elected official suppressing free speech.

I don't see where John and Ken have been prevented from airing their spew. Have you?

42 posted on 10/28/2004 8:31:49 PM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I don't see where John and Ken have been prevented from airing their spew. Have you?

Drieir filed a complaint against them and Clear Channel with the election commission to shut them up. The complaint was read over the air. That was Clear Channel's way of responding to the complaint. Drieir tried some heavy handed arm twisting to prevent them from "airing their spew".

When is the last time you heard of a Republican doing that?

43 posted on 10/28/2004 8:35:35 PM PDT by Nachum (Kerry spells "Fine Dining")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
I've gotten several calls from that same GOP headquarters asking me to come down to the office and help make calls this weekend (I'm registered GOP and live in D.C.). As tempted as I was to tell them to get some of their precious illegal alien day-laborers for this task - I'm going to help anyhow. The only reasons are named Reinquist, O'Connor, and Stevens.

As a former Southern Californian, however, who can barely recognize his home neighborhood, I say hats off to these DJs for holding the feet of weasel traitors like Drier to the fire.
44 posted on 10/28/2004 8:35:37 PM PDT by dagnabbit (Prevent the next 9-11. Stop Islamic immigration and deport Muslim aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
If they receive an FCC fine, they will have been punished for expressing, ironically, popular political views. What part of "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances" do you not understand?
45 posted on 10/28/2004 8:36:59 PM PDT by radicalamericannationalist (Kurtz had the right answer but the wrong location.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: radicalamericannationalist
What part of "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances" do you not understand?

I understand perfectly. John and Ken are ratings pimps.

46 posted on 10/28/2004 8:40:36 PM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I understand perfectly. John and Ken are ratings pimps.

And Drieir is a fat cat Politician looking to take over their territory.

47 posted on 10/28/2004 8:44:45 PM PDT by Nachum (Kerry spells "Fine Dining")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Wow. That's an incredibly strong argument to justify an elected official violating the First Amendment. I guess it's a lucky thing that Dreir is not "bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution." Oops, he is.
48 posted on 10/28/2004 8:52:03 PM PDT by radicalamericannationalist (Kurtz had the right answer but the wrong location.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dagnabbit

In the last year or so, Arizona has seen several new political organizations spring into life, grow, and have an impact on elections at state and local levels. Their only objective is to get rid of RINOs and replace them with solid conservatives. Our state legislature will already look quite different next year -- a lot of RINOs, particularly those who were sucking the toes of our Dem Governess, did not survive the primary election.


49 posted on 10/28/2004 8:58:48 PM PDT by JackelopeBreeder (Proud to be a mean-spirited and divisive loco gringo armed vigilante terrorist cucaracha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: JackelopeBreeder

good news


50 posted on 10/28/2004 9:01:04 PM PDT by dagnabbit (Prevent the next 9-11. Stop Islamic immigration and deport Muslim aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson