Yes...that is true but WHY is it the ONLY thing we hear is how Republicans can't win without OHIO???
More media bias in action.
I am in Missouri. Bush will win here. Out on a limb maybe, but I'll predict by at least 7%.
No Democrat has won the Presidency since the early 19th century without winning Missouri.
Bush leads Kerry by 4.7% in Missouri.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Presidential_04/mo_polls.html
Combine this with the fact that Hawaii ONLY votes GOP in Republican re-election landslides, like Reagan in 84 and Nixon in 72. Both carried Hawaii.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Presidential_04/hi_polls.html
Misouri Republican Party should put out a commercial of John Kerry being "giddy" about the BoSox win and wearing his BosSox ballcap.
Being from Atlanta, I know what losing the World Series is like and having a dufus like Kerry going around with a BoSox ballcap on is pouring salt in the wound.
"No Democrat has won the Presidency since the early 19th century without winning Missouri. "
That's a statistically irrelevent statement. 4 years ago the mantra was, 'no republican has ever won without Calfornia.' and guess what happened. A republican won without California.
Missouri may be for Dubya, but what about that nightmare called St. Louis? How much you wanna bet the polls in the city will, once again, be "allowed" to stay open LATE so that dead men, empty parking lots, and long lost dogs will be able to cast their votes for dems?! It is almost as if the dems WAIT to see how the rest of the state is doing, and when it seems like it is getting down to the wire (and they are too far behind) then "all of a sudden" the polls in the city HAVE to remain open, and the votes for the dems start to sky-rocket and screw the elections. GRRRRRRRRR
They haven't counted the 10 million voters in East St. Louis, yet.
No Democrat has ever won the presidency without carrying Kentucky either.
And no team has won the World Series after being down 3-0 (grrr...)
Bttt.
Bump.