Posted on 11/03/2004 12:22:16 PM PST by jerod
http://www.tarrance.com/files/TTG-Vote-Projections-and-Results.pdf
http://www.tarrance.com/files/TTG-Vote-Projections-and-Results.pdf
Within .1%
Yes they sure did and not just this year either.
Actural = 51.1% - 47.9%
they have **** for zogby in 2000 they should have ---- for him now!!!
What about my poll
Baghdad Bob
for Zogby
mason dixon did well state by state.
Wow. Impressive.
Where was this data prior to election day?
Real Clear Politics did not have it.
I am not inclined to believe the polling companies own claims of accuracy without other proof that it actually made such a precise prediction and publicized it.
RCP does list Pew as being dead on, but not "Battleground".
Statement from John Zogby on 2004 Presidential Election Results:
“We feel strongly that our pre-election polls were accurate on virtually every state. Our predictions on many of the key battleground states like Ohio and Florida were within the margin of error. I thought we captured a trend, but apparently that result didn’t materialize. “We always saw a close race, and a close race is what we’ve got. I’ve called this the Armageddon Election for some time—a closely-divided electorate with high partisan intensity on each side."
I think RCP would have been a lot more accurate too without Zogby.
Poll accuracy thread already posted here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1268326/posts
WOW...that's pretty darn close.
I want to know what Freeper wins for having the closest electoral estimate. I know there were some who said it would be over 300.
Anybody know who got it close?
Of course. BG is bi-partisan!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.