Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Final Just the Facts: Memo from Matthew Dowd
George W. Bush ^ | November 4, 2004

Posted on 11/04/2004 1:20:56 PM PST by RWR8189

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 11/04/2004 1:21:01 PM PST by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Sweet Victory and Revenge!


2 posted on 11/04/2004 1:22:37 PM PST by JessieHelmsJr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
• Garnered 7 million more popular votes than in 2000 - more than twice the amount that President Clinton increased his vote between 1992 and 1996.

my favorite..aimed right at the left and their "most popular President ever" bilge..

3 posted on 11/04/2004 1:23:59 PM PST by WoodstockCat (DNC and John Kerry: Forgers R' Us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Bump for reference.


4 posted on 11/04/2004 1:24:28 PM PST by mattdono ("Crush the democrats, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags" -Big Arnie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Great rundown of the stats but .....

Mr President, please fire Norman Mineta!!!


5 posted on 11/04/2004 1:27:55 PM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: RWR8189
". . . Becomes the first presidential candidate to win more than 50% of the popular vote since 1988. . . ."

I wonder if the Democrats have sat down and asked themselves what it means that no Democrat has been elected President of the United States with a clear majority of the popular vote since 1976? Four times a Republican candidate has won 50%+ of the popular vote since Carter; Reagan in 1984 and 1986, George H. W. Bush in 1988, and George W. Bush in 2004.

Are there any Democrats who think that this statistic is meaningful?
7 posted on 11/04/2004 1:30:34 PM PST by StJacques
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WoodstockCat

Another myth is that Clinton never won a majority "because of Ross Perot". He never won a majority because most voters chose not to vote for him.


8 posted on 11/04/2004 1:37:06 PM PST by scottinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
"the first Republican President to be re-elected with House and Senate majorities since 1924."

To be precise about it, the President who was elected in 1924 was Calvin Coolidge.

Coolidge was not really "re-elected" President in 1924.

He had been elected Vice President in 1920, and became President when President Harding died in 1923.

9 posted on 11/04/2004 1:39:45 PM PST by chs68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JessieHelmsJr

Bump for later reference for my RAT friends and family....hehhehehe...gosh, I'm mean...;-)



10 posted on 11/04/2004 1:40:05 PM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

bump


11 posted on 11/04/2004 1:40:09 PM PST by rwfromkansas (BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mattdono

ME TOO.

I wish the bookmark feature actually worked...


12 posted on 11/04/2004 1:42:34 PM PST by RobRoy (You only "know" what you experience. Everything else is mere belief.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Also, another piece of data that shatters the myth that undecideds go 2-1 for the challenger in Presidential races...Dowd's numbers showed a 51-48 in favor of Bush for undecideds.


13 posted on 11/04/2004 1:44:19 PM PST by mrs9x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottinoc

...Another myth is that Clinton never won a majority "because of Ross Perot"...

Man, I had not heard that one. That's exactly backwards.
Conservatives went for Perot, not liberals. Bush 41 would have been reelected handily.


14 posted on 11/04/2004 1:45:37 PM PST by planekT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

?
the bookmark feature works just fine for me.


15 posted on 11/04/2004 1:46:54 PM PST by King Prout ("We've found more WMDs in Iraq than we've found disenfranchised blacks in Florida." - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JessieHelmsJr
• Employing cutting-edge research to efficiently target Republicans and Swing Voters through media buys and voter contact, the first time a presidential campaign utilized such research.

It seems odd that this was the first Presidential campaign ever to use targeted advertising. What was different about this "cutting-edge" research and traditional demographic research?
16 posted on 11/04/2004 1:52:36 PM PST by highimpact (Where are we going in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I'm loving this...


17 posted on 11/04/2004 2:13:50 PM PST by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I know that this was written by Matthew Dowd yesterday, so some information is already outdated. Votes are still being counted in many States (absentee) and as of today, the President has nearly, 59,100,000 votes. Also, here is an interesting fact. When the MSM and the liberals tell you that we have a "divided" nation, tell them that THEY are absolutely, positively WRONG!! How could we be divded, when 83%, YES....83% of counties in the United States voted to re-elect President Bush?? An amazing statistic, isn't it?? PASS THE WORD!!


18 posted on 11/04/2004 2:16:03 PM PST by GeorgeW23225 (Liberals really aren*t bad people. It*s just that they know so much that simply ISN*T true!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

Well, I found out that it will tell you that it has been bookmarked and gives you the option to return to the thread. If you don't select that option, the bookmark does not show up - at least not for me. My last one did show up after I selected that option, but many others are simply not there.

It might be that the message shows up too soon, implying that it has been bookmarked when, in fact, you MUST return to the thread for the process to complete.

I dunno. You would think that if you get a message saying the bookmark has been added that it would have been added. I'm not whining about it. I'm just observing it.


19 posted on 11/04/2004 2:16:30 PM PST by RobRoy (You only "know" what you experience. Everything else is mere belief.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: highimpact

I don't think that targeted advertising is new. I think that the "technology" used to identify our base of support, was the new aspect of the campaign. I hope we keep the technology under lock and key. We certainly don't want the democRats to have it!! :-)


20 posted on 11/04/2004 2:19:53 PM PST by GeorgeW23225 (Liberals really aren*t bad people. It*s just that they know so much that simply ISN*T true!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson