Posted on 11/06/2004 5:11:17 AM PST by Always Right
Specter Ping List....Please comment and provide any suggestions. Thanks everyone for their help in this effort. FreeRepublic and other grassroot groups can make a difference.
"http://www.gopusa.com/activist/petitions/petition.php?petition=specter_chairman"
Petition to remove Specter as head of Judiciary...please sign.
Too bad you can't get some female to claim abuse.
Thanks, I will sign it. I have already included it in the Petititions on the Web section of this post. If there is some information I need to add, please comment.
Yeah that would be good. Tragically though, the biggest problem is most of the victims of Specter just get flushed down the drain.
I hope everyone who hasn't done so already will make those calls and blast those emails to Bill Frist today?
Doc Savage has signed the petition, faxed the entire Senate, sent a letter to Santorum warning him that I will work to defeat him in the next election if he continues to back Specter, and sent a note to Specter decrying his warning to President Bush! Let's Roll!
Forgot, also sent e-mail to Frist! And just for good measure, I did NOT vote for Specter! Remember Holly Maddux and remember how this sleaze Specter allowed her killer, Ira Einhorn, to flee the country!!!!!
Please listen to this fact filled audio clip about specter the terrible:
Judicial Nominees Could Hit a New Roadblock in Committee
http://www.cwfa.org/play.asp?id=cw20041105c
Acording to the interview, The vote is Wensday November 17.
mississippi red-neck said:
http://www.cwfa.org/main.asp
I'm posting this on all the links about Specter it explains the power of a chairman and the ruthless man himself.
For heavens sake go to Concerned Women of America and listen to this clip about Specter and an explanation of the power that a chairman has over these nominations. If this man gets chairmanship for the next six years we will not get any decent judges.It's now or never. When you get there click on the new link about Judical roadblocks . Give it time to play. It's stunning.
Please go and read Hugh Hewitts Friday night post on this topic. He's a lawyer, worked in the White House and is the smartest political observer around. He's saying the composition of the court 12-7 or 11-8 is more important than the Chairman. He says that to set aside the ascendency rules for political expediency will do more harm than good. Read his post and reconsider. I was as fired up as anyone and did call several Senator's offices, but I'm pretty sure we've made our point by now with Speckieboy and it may be time to change the arguement to composition of the committee rather than the chair. hughhewitt.com is the address.
bumpity
I agree. I can support Guiliani's and Arnold's who hold different views. But with Specter it is a crusade to get liberal judges to the bench. It is the very essence for his existence in the Senate. I can not support a guy who I know for a fact main goal is to stab me in the back. If you don't understand that, i apologize.
Hewitt's problem is he does not realize Specter's resolve to beat conservative judges. It is Specter's purpose in life.
Great info! Now, let's get busy!
Great info! Now, let's get busy!
I don't know why this didn't come through earlier.
Hewitt is wrong, and the effort to derail Specter is misguided. More important that either Specter or the composition of the committee is forcing a rule change in the Senate to eliminate the use of the filibuster in the case of nomination confirmations.
If THAT isn't done, NOTHING CHANGES, no matter whether Specter is in charge of the committee or not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.