Posted on 11/08/2004 11:08:45 PM PST by upchuck
Do you know how to cure a chicken-killin' dog? Now, you know you cannot keep a dog that kills chickens, no matter how fine a dog it is otherwise.
Some people think you cannot break a dog that has got in the habit of killin' chickens, but my friend John Henry always claimed you could. He said the way to do it is to take one of the chickens the dog has killed and wire the thing around the dog's neck, good and strong. And leave it there until that dead chicken stinks so bad that no other dog or person will even go near that poor beast. Thing'll smell so bad the dog won't be able to stand himself. You leave it on there until the last little bit of flesh rots and falls off, and that dog won't kill chickens again.
The Bush administration is going to be wired around the neck of the American people for four more years, long enough for the stench to sicken everybody. It should cure the country of electing Republicans.
And at least Democrats won't have to clean up after him until it is real clear to everyone who made the mess.
In some circles, that will be seen as sour grapes. But in Texas, we've been losing elections to the demagogic triad of God, gays and guns long enough to be pretty cynical about how it works out. I'm sure millions of Americans voted for George W. under the honest impression that he stands for moral values — family, patriotism, faith in God. I'm sure it's the Democrats' fault that such a silly ruse is allowed to stand. What Bush actually does stand for is nicely summed up by a rather common news story that got stuck on the business pages lately.
In September, Merck & Co., the huge drug manufacturer, pulled Vioxx off the market. Vioxx was a popular pain-killing, anti-arthritis drug, but Merck said it was putting patients' safety first. A new study from the Federal Drug Administration showed high doses of Vioxx triple the risk of heart attack and sudden cardiac death.
From there, the story bifurcates — it takes two directions. Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa revealed that the FDA had tried to silence the author of the study, Dr. David Graham, associate director of science in the Office of Drug Safety. Grassley said the FDA first sat on Graham's study and that then he was "ostracized" and "subjected to veiled threats and intimidation."
The Wall Street Journal followed the other fork, finding internal memos from Merck showing that company officials may have been aware of the dangers of Vioxx as long ago as 1996, including a memo apparently instructing its sales reps to "dodge" the question when doctors asked about the cardiac record of Vioxx.
In short, we have a toothless regulatory agency in the pocket of the industry it is supposed to patrol. We have an administration-wide contempt for science and plain facts. And the allegation against the folks at Merck is that they were making such enormous profits on a drug that killed people that when they knew or suspected it was killing people, they kept right on selling it. When the information that Merck had known for a long time about Vioxx and heart attacks became public, the company's stock fell by 9.6 percent.
That's the system George W. Bush stands for: where a corporation can knowingly kill people for profit and, when it finally comes out, everyone knows the penalties will be so light the company doesn't even lose a tenth of its worth. Hey, just a little bump in the road.
We sure don't want any of that terrible, burdensome government regulation to control that kind of behavior, do we? We sure don't want an FDA that listens to its own scientists and acts promptly, do we? We sure don't want anyone to sue these monster corporations, do we? I bet if it were possible to compare the odds of an American getting killed by a negligent regulatory agency and rapacious corporate behavior versus an American getting killed by a terrorist, it would turn out we need to be a lot more scared of rank greed and its enablers than we do of terrorists. And that's not counting what the corps. (pronounced corpse) steal and mess up.
So, fellow progressives, stop thinking about suicide or moving abroad. Want to feel better? Eat a sour grape, then do something immediately, now, today. Figure out what you can do to help rescue the country — join something, send a little money to some group, call somewhere and offer to volunteer, find a politician you like at the local level and start helping him or her to move up.
Think about how you can lend a hand to the amazing myriad efforts that will promptly break out to help the country recover from what it has done to itself. Now is the time. Don't mourn, organize.
The fact that Vioxx kills people is all President Bush's fault. Of course it is! How could I have been so dumb?
I'd love to see Molly and Ann Coulter in a knock-down, drag-out debate. That would be worth the price of admission!
When she has no one to steal from she's real bad.
Molly Ivins -- like so many other post-election hysterical liberal media -- are cartoon characters who desperately need distemper shots.
The stench of Molly Ivins already sickens me.
You should have a "Hit the sauce AFTER finishing the column" rule, Molls.
This is completely vile. No editor should post such a rant. I think we should start letter writing campaigns to all of these rags!
...company officials may have been aware of the dangers of Vioxx as long ago as 1996...
But, since the drug was actually taken off the market during Bush's tenure, it must be his fault. According to my precise calculations, Mr. Bush became President in January of 2001. Never mind. In the Ivins' world, causation is irrelevant. There are no logical connections, only political ones. And of course, like all liberals, Person Ivins considers herself an "advanced thinker."
Any forecast on when when we can get the stench of Person Ivins out of our noses?
No, no, no pictures.....AAAAhhhhhhgggggggghhhhh I'm blind....I'm blind.
I took a moment to write this loser and tell her over and over what a loser she and her party are. Ah, such satisfaction!
These people have totally lost their freakin minds. Looking back at election night I think "Dan Ratherisms" was a hint of things to come.
I apologize in advance for slipping over to the ad hominem.
I can't shake my image of this overweight, unkempt female, with her over emphasized Texas drawl, standing in a social setting with an old fashioned glass half full of whiskey.
...seems she never gets tired of this kind of rhetoric. ...nasty in so many ways.
Molly Ivins' brain bifurcates between garbage and lies.
Molly Ivins--all of the smell and filth of a barnyard animal; none of the nutrition.
"Do you know how to cure a chicken-killin' dog?"
No. But my dog does go in the basement and takes a dump down there once in awhile. I believe I've found the solotuion. Print out this editorial and picture enough times to cover that corner of the basement. Even my dog won't want to go there.
I'm confused about something. The "progressives" have complained that the prescription drug benefit bill that Bush signed makes drugs more costly for Medicare recipients. If that is true, then didn't Bush help save lives by making Vioxx harder to get for those at risk? I guess there is just no pleasing some people.
Will Vioxx be taken off the market in Canada too? Or will people be able to buy it for less by purchasing from Canadian sources?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.