Skip to comments.
National Geographic Ignores The Flaws in Darwin's Theory
Discovery Institute News ^
| 11/8/04
| Jonathan Wells
Posted on 11/09/2004 11:21:22 AM PST by Michael_Michaelangelo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420, 421-423 last
To: R. Scott
You mean like THIS???
 Scientific American publishes a six-page news story on nanotechnology in their April 1996 issue. The story is inaccurate and biased. From this six-page story, only two paragraphs are published on the Web by SciAm at this point. |
421
posted on
11/18/2004 4:13:42 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
To: Elsie
| John Rennie, Editor of SciAm says: "I am a Journalistist; not a Scientist." |
(More fuel for the fire............. ;^)
422
posted on
11/18/2004 4:27:49 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
To: Elsie
Thank God for the internet - we are no longer stuck with having only one or two sources.
423
posted on
11/19/2004 6:24:39 AM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420, 421-423 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
