Posted on 11/10/2004 4:55:47 PM PST by Mike Fieschko
Leaders of a United States Senate subcommittee investigating allegations of fraud in the oil-for-food program in Iraq have accused Kofi Annan, the United Nations secretary general, of obstructing their inquiry.In a letter sent to Mr. Annan yesterday, the Republican chairman and ranking Democrat on the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations charged that the secretary general and a panel he appointed to conduct an independent investigation into the charges of abuses appeared to be "affirmatively preventing" the Senate from getting documents from a former United Nations contractor that inspected goods bought by Iraq.
The senators also complained that Mr. Annan was blocking access to 55 internal audit reports of the program and other relevant documents and refusing to permit United Nations officials to be interviewed by the subcommittee's investigators.
The United Nations-administered program, which ran from 1996 to 2003, allowed Iraq to sell oil to buy food and other essential supplies for Iraqis hurt by economic sanctions.
The senators said it had taken four months for Mr. Annan to reply to the subcommittee's requests, and when he finally did, he refused to cooperate with the Senate inquiry.
"We are concerned that the U.N.'s nondisclosure policy is being used as both a sword and a shield," the senators wrote, "sharing such 'internal records' when it favors the U.N., but then declining to do so when such disclosure could have negative implications."
The blunt letter is signed by the subcommittee's chairman, Senator Norm Coleman, Republican of Minnesota, and Senator Carl Levin, Democrat of Michigan.
Edward Mortimer, director of communications in the secretary general's office, said United Nations officials would "carefully look into what is clearly a very awkward and troubling letter."
He said he would also consult with Paul A. Volcker, who heads the United Nations-appointed investigation panel. Mr. Mortimer emphasized that Mr. Annan had instructed all United Nations staff to cooperate with Mr. Volcker's panel, known as the Independent Inquiry Committee.
Neither Mr. Volcker nor members of his staff, who have had a tense relationship with several House and Senate committees investigating the program, could be reached for comment last night.
The subcommittee also announced yesterday that on Monday it would hold the first of several hearings into allegations of widespread corruption in the $64 billion program. Among the first witnesses scheduled is Charles A. Duelfer, the chief American adviser on Iraq's unconventional weapons programs. Mr. Duelfer, the head of the Iraq Survey Group, recently published a lengthy report on Iraqi weapons programs that documented Saddam Hussein's use of the program not to buy civilian supplies as intended, but to generate billions of dollars in illicit money, undermine sanctions and buy conventional arms.
In their letter to Mr. Annan, the senators cited the United Nations' refusal to permit Lloyd's Register, which the United Nations had hired to inspect Iraq's purchases, to provide documents to the Senate investigators.
In an Aug. 31 letter, the director of the United Nations' legal affairs office told Lloyd's that while Lloyd's should cooperate fully with Mr. Volcker's panel, "under no circumstances" was it authorized to provide documents to the subcommittee.
The letter also asks Mr. Annan to permit the Senate investigators to interview 11 senior United Nations officials, including Benon V. Sevan, who headed the program. Mr. Duelfer's report said Mr. Sevan might have received oil allocations from Saddam Hussein. Mr. Sevan has denied any impropriety.
Smells fishy, doesn't it?
That's what I've always assumed. I trust Volcker as much as I trust Kofi.
Annan’s critical view of Christians who struggle against the culture of death was made evident in December 2000 at a farewell event for Nafis Sadik, the former head of the UN's population control arm, UNFPA.
Annan praised Sadik for her promotion of population control around the world. "You have done more than anyone to bring about a radical change in the way the world sees population issues,” he said. In a revealing quote Annan lauded Sadik's "willingness to brave the wrath, if not of the Almighty Himself, then certainly of those who claim to speak for Him here on earth. ... And what is more, you have won your point."
After comments like these, I would think that Annan's blocking access to 55 internal audit reports and other relevant documents to the leaders of a United States Senate subcommittee, is mere child's play.
You have a devious mind. I like it : -)
In my opinion, you should step back from the crack pipe and then remain away from it for a period of several days. Unless of course you merely forgot the /sarcasm tag.
Coughing Anus wields plenty of power when you consider he is the official leader of a completely irrelevant organization that is rapidly heading to its' demise. He gets to determine which countries will attempt to undermine the US on which issues, and he also gets to issue those "stern warnings" and "threats of sanction" which help mold the very fabric of our daily existence. Without him, the UN may have actually become a world government, so he is actually owed our thanks.
His complete ineptitude at administering the UN has accelerated its' hypersonic ride into oblivion. I can't think of more than a couple of other leaders who could've done nearly as well in dooming the UN. Clinton comes to mind, along with Jimma Carter,or just about any head of state from the EU. Hell, I'll admit it. The much awaited death throes of the UN are all Bush's fault.
If that doesn't put him on Mt Rushmore, nothing will. Not even The Gipper was able to kill the UN.
And the new organization should have a termed life of 50 years. Then we start over again, based on what the world looks like then.
Naa. I honestly can't voluntarily atribute high-ground motives to any Demoncraps any more. I honestly have to think that a lot of RATS are squirming pretty hard at the scrutiny that Kofi and Co. are under. They'd rather it go away, because the UN is their solution to world peace, but they can't speak out against the investigation because of the scope and magnitude of the scandal.
A real pickle for the RATS. Heh.
Prairie
Sounds an awful lot like "No controlling legal authority."
why would a criminal allow you to investigate him? we need to get out of the UN and stop financing these terrorists.
Thanks for the graphics. :)
Get the U.S. out of the U.N.
Get the U.N. out of the U.S.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.