Posted on 11/16/2004 5:28:02 PM PST by NormsRevenge
UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The head of an independent panel investigating alleged corruption in the now-defunct U.N. oil-for-food program for Iraq (news - web sites) rejected on Tuesday a request to immediately turn over evidence that he has gathered to U.S. congressional investigators.
Former U.S. Federal Reserve (news - web sites) Chairman Paul Volcker instead pledged to make virtually all the evidence public at his own pace, beginning early in 2005.
Volcker, who leads the Independent Inquiry Committee on the scandal-ridden U.N. relief program, had been asked by two U.S. senators for immediate access to documents and U.N. witnesses for use in a parallel investigation by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.
Republican Sen. Norm Coleman (news, bio, voting record) of Minnesota, head of the investigations subcommittee, and the subcommittee's top Democrat, Carl Levin of Michigan, last week accused both Volcker and U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan (news - web sites) of engineering a massive cover-up of U.N. wrongdoing by blocking their access to documents and potential U.N. witnesses.
"How was the world so blind to this massive amount of influence-peddling?" Coleman asked on Monday during a hearing of his subcommittee.
At that hearing, congressional investigators alleged that Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s regime reaped over $21 billion from oil kickbacks and smuggling while U.N. sanctions were in place against Iraq from 1991 to 2003.
DANGERS IN PREMATURE RELEASE
But Volcker said his investigation, ordered by Annan and backed by the U.N. Security Council, would not share evidence until it was no longer needed for its inquiries.
"The clear purpose is to avoid potentially misleading and incomplete information that could impair ongoing investigation, distort public perceptions and violate simple concerns of due process," he said in identical letters to Coleman, Levin and Annan, and released by the United Nations (news - web sites).
Volcker warned in particular against the subcommittee calling U.N. officials before it as hearing witnesses.
"For a U.N. official to appear before the subcommittee in the current highly charged environment would plainly risk ending prospects for their cooperation with our committee and with subsequent potential criminal investigations," he said.
Once his panel was done with a particular avenue of investigation, he intended to make virtually all its evidence public, with the possible exception of information whose release would reveal confidential sources, Volcker said.
That meant his investigators likely would release by January a series of internal and external U.N. audits of the program and all evidence related to U.N. inspection and bank contractors and oil-for-food administrative expenses, he said.
Other avenues of inquiry would take longer.
At the same time, he was open to sharing information sooner with criminal investigations into particular cases, both in the United States and abroad, "consistent with our own investigative requirements and principles," Volcker added.
"The disclosure to which we are committed is, to the best of my knowledge, unprecedented for any international organization," Volcker said. "Transparency is our ultimate objective, in the firm belief that a fully verifiable, credible report is in the interest of the United Nations and of all its member nations."
I think I saw where one just opened. I was going to ping you to the news item, but I got too busy.
Give them 24 hours to hand over the documents or send in the Marines to take them.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1282225/posts
Oil-for-Food Money Went to Palestinian Bombers' Families
foxnews.com ^ | November 17, 2004 | foxnews.com
Posted on 11/17/2004 10:33:40 AM PST by drpix
WASHINGTON — Money from the United Nations Oil-for-Food program (search) helped pay the families of Palestinian homicide bombers, the House Committee on International Relations is expected to reveal Wednesday during a hearing on corruption in the Iraqi relief program.
Investigators working for Illinois Republican Rep. Henry Hyde, chairman of the panel, are expected to say they have traced funds from former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's (search)kickback scheme through a Jordanian bank and into the hands of families of bombers who attacked Israeli citizens.
It has long been established that Saddam paid bounties of $15,000 to $25,000 to the Palestinian families of the murderers. Hyde's committee will reveal at the hearing that some of the reward money was deposited from illegal profits Saddam made by demanding 10 percent kickbacks on all the contracts of companies that did business with the U.N.'s Oil-for-Food program.
Oil-for-Food Money Went to Palestinian Bombers' Families
foxnews.com ^ | November 17, 2004 | foxnews.com
Posted on 11/17/2004 10:33:40 AM PST by drpix
WASHINGTON — Money from the United Nations Oil-for-Food program (search) helped pay the families of Palestinian homicide bombers, the House Committee on International Relations is expected to reveal Wednesday during a hearing on corruption in the Iraqi relief program.
Investigators working for Illinois Republican Rep. Henry Hyde, chairman of the panel, are expected to say they have traced funds from former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's (search)kickback scheme through a Jordanian bank and into the hands of families of bombers who attacked Israeli citizens.
It has long been established that Saddam paid bounties of $15,000 to $25,000 to the Palestinian families of the murderers. Hyde's committee will reveal at the hearing that some of the reward money was deposited from illegal profits Saddam made by demanding 10 percent kickbacks on all the contracts of companies that did business with the U.N.'s Oil-for-Food program.
It still has not been approved by the SEC.
One can only imagine the BSers,liars and spinners who deal in gold. They are probably helping to drive up the value of gold. Then they will buy in big time on this ETF and sell after the first few hours. Then, the market value will drop about 20% in a day or two.
"Transparency is our ultimate objective,....."
What Kerryesque Frenchlike nuance. He doesn't say "We will be transparent" but signals he won't, and if he isn't it's not his doing but a failed "objective".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.