Posted on 11/18/2004 7:32:47 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
Not a bad trick. Since each individual mutation (of which the vast majority are lethal)has no way of self-directing itself, nor determining it's individual outcome as being positive or negative to the species, we must conclude that either this was a "directed" natural selection or an accident, or never occurred.
Evolution is a theory. An unproven theory. There are other theories, and there may someday be additional theories as to how we came to exist as we are. I don't know the answer myself, but clearly evolution has holes in it big enough to drive logic through.
"Developed to run"? This so-called scientist comes up with long distance running as another "proof" to evolution? That they needed to run long distances to find food?
Yeah, sure, they needed to run 26 miles to get a rabbit. Like a cheetah.
Somehow our bone structure tells a different story.
I can get the same result sitting in my recliner watching football ...
Well, I know but that's first thing everybody says. What about the way the Inuit hunt or the way the Celts hunted? Where I live, the Indians used to drive pronghorn and buffalo over small cliffs into dry washes. They didn't run, they walked (and later rode).
I guess I'm just not totally convinced.
Quote | Look at how tribes like the Bushmen hunt. They chase an animal. It runs away. They follow and chase it some more. It runs away again. Do that for a few miles and it collapses from heat exhaustion because humans are among the best at getting rid of heat from the body. (of course sitting in a deer blind with some beer is a lot easier). |
"When Better Bodies are Built, God Will Build Them".
We don't have fur so we do not overheat when we run in hot weather. We also have the ability to perspire over our entire bodies, another adaptation for running in the heat. Humans are not engineered for speed the way a cheetah is, but instead for endurance: a healthy, fit human can run for hours without a break even in hot weather. (I'm not an impressive physical specimen, but I can run for an hour at a 9 minute pace.) Very few mammals can do this.
According to the logic of evolution, the mere fact we have this remarkable ability implies that we evolved to have it -- our ancestors ran.
Humans Were Born to Run, Scientists Say
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1282245/posts
Here is my experience on this subject:
Used to be a financially succussful middle distance & sometime distance runner.
A few times I recall doing what for me were very mild cross-country training runs with my sisters dobermans. The first time was in 1985 with one dog and the second time was in 1987 with another dog. Both dogs were dobermans. The first dog was a male, the second was a female. Both times were in the summer with the temperature in the middle 70's. Both dogs had to be put down not long afterwards. I recall the pacing was nothing difficult, about 5:00 to 5:30 per mile pace over about 3 miles. Both dobermans were considered very active, but after the first mile they seemed to loose interest.
Did not realize what was happening at the time and regret it. Only later in a conversation with another competitive runner who is also a dog-owner saying that he would never put his dog through the sorts of training that a class runner does on a routine basis since they just aren't built for it.
Balding doesn't seem like it would play much of a factor in evolution: For the majority of humanity's history, we haven't lived long enough to go bald, and we still usually reproduce before we do!
They normally do except in the case where "God" might manifest.
That would make them ignorant.
< / sarcasm >
I know the creationists here may jump all over that comment. But let me point out that I respect their right to express their beliefs not because I agree with their conclusions but because they're correct in pointing out that darwinism is a theory. I happen to believe that the basics of that theory are most likely true (I take great exception to a lot of the details which anthropologists treat as "fact") but the dogmatic suppression of alternative ideas, theories, or beliefs is wrong.
Living in aquatic environment is another strong possibility. Even primates walk on two feet when they cross a body of water.
Well said!!
Evolution hoax and conspiracy to destroy running -Jeremy Wariner, first white american to enter the top ten of global sports
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1197709/posts
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest -- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
Well put. Humans also mimicked existing predators, doing the creep-up-on from downwind. Some prey species also have limited territories, making it possible to get them cornered. In North America there's the old kill site, "Head Bashed In" (translation) I think in western Canada, where herds were herded into a sort of funnel and over a cliff. Techniques were more important than long distance running. Probably the only role LDR played was in flight from danger -- and most of that danger was probably other humans, since (as you note) many animals outrun us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.