Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senators want end [federally funded] voter drives at housing projects
Google News ^ | Ana Radelat

Posted on 11/20/2004 7:17:36 AM PST by ClintonBeGone

Washington — The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is fighting a proposal being pushed by Sen. Christopher "Kit" Bond that would discourage get-out-the-vote efforts in public housing projects. Bond and the proposal's main backer, GOP Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, said it seeks to prevent a repeat of an incident at a public housing project in California in 2002. In that incident, an AFL-CIO affiliate that used a $50,000 HUD grant to conduct get-out-the-vote efforts in public housing projects in San Francisco reportedly targeted only likely Democrats.

Bond said Congress has provided $3 billion under the Help America Vote Act to make it easier for all Americans to vote.

"Housing funds should be used to meet housing needs, not partisan politics," he said.

Hilary Shelton, director of the NAACP's Washington bureau, predicted the restriction would affect 3 million Americans who live in public housing. He said about 46 percent of those people are black. Shelton called the provision "outrageous."

The proposal would bar public housing projects from using federal funds for any election activities, including voter registration, voter identification and get-out-the-vote activities.

Shelton said the NAACP agrees federal funds should not be spent on campaigning for or against a particular candidate or party. But he said public housing authorities should continue to help their residents with transportation to the polls and with voter registration. Almost a third of public housing residents are elderly and need help exercising their right to vote, Shelton said.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama; US: California; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: abuse; bond; election; fraud; hud; naacp; shelby; voterfraud; waste
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
I'm amazed, yet not really, that this type of crap is funded with our tax dollars.
1 posted on 11/20/2004 7:17:36 AM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/politics/story/ACE884553A33532B86256F500020AD55?OpenDocument&Headline=Bond+wants+to+keep+HUD+money+out+of+election+activities


2 posted on 11/20/2004 7:18:22 AM PST by ClintonBeGone (Sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
Obviousy, this needs to be addressed, but it is just the tip of the iceberg.

The GOP needs to pass some serious voter fraud laws this term if we want to maintain our majority status in the future. As millions and millions of illegals continue to flood the country every year, it is just a matter of time until they overtake us unless we get serious about vote fraud.

3 posted on 11/20/2004 7:21:56 AM PST by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

that's what the democrats and their unions do.

in a local election recently i met a ph.d. student from out of state who had a u.s. government grant to work for a democrat to unseat a republican, which happened.


4 posted on 11/20/2004 7:23:30 AM PST by ken21 (against the democrat plantation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

No kiddin !


5 posted on 11/20/2004 7:24:59 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: ken21

While we should, we don't even have to do major voting reform. Even simple things like this will go a long way towards not only protecting our majority, but seeing that the institution of elections is preserved.


7 posted on 11/20/2004 7:26:56 AM PST by ClintonBeGone (Sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Made in USA

This is a good start.


8 posted on 11/20/2004 7:27:37 AM PST by ride the whirlwind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

I think the average american would be amazed at the level to which the other site cheats. It's like having a college exam every 4 years where half the class shows up with all forms of cheat sheets and no respect for the process.


9 posted on 11/20/2004 7:28:30 AM PST by ClintonBeGone (Sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

The Republicans learned in recent years, that you don't HAVE to pay people to register voters.

Incite and invigorate peoples passion and sensibility, and the word and efforts spread on their own.


10 posted on 11/20/2004 7:34:14 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

One part of me thinks that I am a much more worthy cause, when it comes to federal grants, than a lot of people. However, self respect keeps me from trying to get some of that money.


11 posted on 11/20/2004 7:34:15 AM PST by stylin_geek (Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

And then, they actually accuse the other side of cheating and call for them to be investigated and try to have their grades "overturned".


12 posted on 11/20/2004 7:35:09 AM PST by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
Why isn't anybody proposing a FEDERAL law that would REQUIRE ID at the polls to vote?
13 posted on 11/20/2004 7:37:39 AM PST by Lizavetta (Modern liberalism: Where everyone must look different but think the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

Outrageous!


14 posted on 11/20/2004 7:38:41 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/summary.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking

ping


15 posted on 11/20/2004 7:40:00 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/summary.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek
One part of me thinks that I am a much more worthy cause, when it comes to federal grants, than a lot of people. However, self respect keeps me from trying to get some of that money."

 

What Free Government Grants Do You Want?

Ask Matthew Lesko!

  • $100,000 Grants for a Small Home Based Business?
     
  • $8,000 Free grants for study the effects of pork bones on your pet?
     
  • $75,000 Government Grants to Remodel Your House?
     
  • $140,000 in Grants to Open A Bookstore or coffee shop?
     
  • $6,000 Free government grants to train people in the projects how to vote?
     
  • $2000 in grants to cow flops as alternative energy?
     

 

16 posted on 11/20/2004 7:45:28 AM PST by ClintonBeGone (Sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

Why should my tax dollars be used to get these people to vote for Rats.


17 posted on 11/20/2004 7:49:56 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, AIr Force, Pray for all our military in hostile territory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

Lesko may be a nut. But something tells me he's a rich nut.


18 posted on 11/20/2004 8:09:26 AM PST by festus (Old growth timbers make the best campfires....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: festus
Lesko may be a nut. But something tells me he's a rich nut.

He'd have to be to afford those fancy clothes. :)

Seriously, I'm sure he is and all he's done is compile a bunch of public documents. What a wonderful country.

19 posted on 11/20/2004 8:15:21 AM PST by ClintonBeGone (Sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

Republicans need a serious backbone transplant. At the very least, they should require all people to provide a photo ID before voting. Democrats, of course, oppose this, claiming such a requirement would "intimidate" minorities. If Republicans want to allow Democrats to continue to stuff the ballot boxes, then, by all means, they should not fight for a photo ID requirement.


20 posted on 11/20/2004 8:26:44 AM PST by Holden Magroin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson