Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Times is referring to this article, Heart Scanner Stirs New Hope and a Debate
1 posted on 11/20/2004 8:13:50 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

MRI's were originally restricted to one unit per state and cost was exhorbitant. The more MRI's, the more use. Costs were reduced. Same will be true with the scanner. The more it is used even for non necessary items will reduce the cost per unit.

I don't quite agree with the chickern little that a faster , less stressful, more accurate diagnostic tool will be bad.


2 posted on 11/20/2004 8:26:23 PM PST by Rhiannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fourdeuce82d; El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; ...

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.


4 posted on 11/20/2004 9:25:58 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"Used recklessly, however, the scans could break the medical bank."

I had one. I paid for it 100% out of my own pocket. Please explain to me, NYT, how this will "break the medical bank"?

5 posted on 11/21/2004 5:12:41 AM PST by norwaypinesavage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
They take seconds to conduct and require no recovery time. . .

Then why do they cost $700?

6 posted on 11/21/2004 6:07:16 AM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson