Skip to comments.
WI Deadly Hunter Shooting Spree Update
WEAU TV 13 ^
| 11/22/2004
| Andrew Fefer, Paige Pearson, Anna Wagnild, Trevor Luetke
Posted on 11/22/2004 6:56:07 PM PST by quietolong
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Watch the news conference at 1pm they have released more info should be in print shortly
To: quietolong
Though Vang's background isn't entirely clear, his criminal history is, and includes multiple run-ins with Twin Cities law enforcement. St. Paul police have responded to four incidents at Vang's Fourth Street address. The matters have involved domestic abuse and possible thefts.,
So why was he allowed to even get a hunting license or own a weapon? I believe in the 2nd amendment, but I think criminals do lose constitutional rights once they have been convicted of crimes especially violent crimes.
To: quietolong
Tragic..May God be with the loved ones and those he wounded.
3
posted on
11/22/2004 7:00:03 PM PST
by
MEG33
( Congratulations President Bush!..Thank you God. Four More Years!)
To: quietolong
"I was shocked, I thought I was in a dream or something. I thought I'd wake up and nothing would be wrong," says Vang's brother who wished to be unidentified.
Sad. I know exactly how that feels (not that any of my relatives have ever done anything this horrible!).
To: Paleo Conservative
So why was he allowed to even get a hunting license or own a weapon? I believe in the 2nd amendment, but I think criminals do lose constitutional rights once they have been convicted of crimes especially violent crimes. Where did it say he was convicted?
5
posted on
11/22/2004 7:02:17 PM PST
by
supercat
(If Kerry becomes President, nothing bad will happen for which he won't have an excuse.)
To: Paleo Conservative
So why was he allowed to even get a hunting license or own a weapon? I believe in the 2nd amendment, but I think criminals do lose constitutional rights once they have been convicted of crimes especially violent crimes. It doesn't say anything about convictions. And a response by law enforcement does not neccessarily mean that he was doing anything-- it could have been thefts of his stuff, even. Frankly, the way this story is worded could be completely unfair (acknowledging, of course, this person is apparently guilty of the shootings alleged).
6
posted on
11/22/2004 7:04:02 PM PST
by
atomicpossum
(I am the Cat that walks by himself, and all places are alike to me.)
To: Paleo Conservative
So why was he allowed to even get a hunting license or own a weapon? According to the local news, he was never charged and convicted in any of those previous incidents, therefore his right to possess a gun is unrestrained.
Oddly enough, though, the local stations are reporting that he was convicted and fined for poaching last year, which may explain why he was hunting in Wisconsin: he probably couldn't get a license in Minnesota.
7
posted on
11/22/2004 7:04:59 PM PST
by
brbethke
To: Paleo Conservative
No felony convictions.
The left and ACLU types protect these while blasting lawful gun owners.
To: quietolong
To: quietolong
At least the gun-grabbers will keep their mouths shut about this one, since the perp is a minority and the victims were non-minorities.
10
posted on
11/22/2004 7:09:08 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
To: quietolong
I have lived around the Hmong for nearly 20 yrs and one thing (of a great many things) they seem to have little respect for are game laws...and private property..
11
posted on
11/22/2004 7:19:31 PM PST
by
joesnuffy
("The merit of our Constitution was, not that it promotes democracy, but checks it." Horatio Seymour)
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: quietolong
This man deserves the death penalty! Anyone else feel the same way that my wife and I do?
13
posted on
11/22/2004 7:21:33 PM PST
by
Grassontop
(Garfield the cat is my favorite cat! I really liked his movie! .;) Jesus will always be my savior!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
No, they won't. They're already nattering about how this wouldn't have happened if people weren't allowed to own "high-powered automatic assault rifles."
That, and I've already heard one chattering idiot of a radio commentator say, "He must have been provoked," and this was all caused by those racist redneck yokels.
To: wogworld
To: Flatus I. Maximus
Sad the poacher wasn't given an opportunity to drop his weapon before exiting the tree stand at gunpoint. Lives would have been saved.
16
posted on
11/22/2004 7:26:28 PM PST
by
glock rocks
(You're on, Bo... which is it... prime rib or Atta Boy?)
To: MEG33
Another illegal alien with 10 children on welfare kills a bunch of tax paying Americans.
They should deport his whole effing family.
17
posted on
11/22/2004 7:28:31 PM PST
by
FrankRepublican
(Boycott NBC & their parent company General Electric for smearing the USMC)
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: FrankRepublican
What makes you think he was here illegally or that he has 10 children? The story clearly states that he has 6 children and served in the US Army.
19
posted on
11/22/2004 7:33:33 PM PST
by
claudiustg
(Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson