1 posted on
11/24/2004 4:35:32 AM PST by
paudio
To: paudio
Good post.
The ISA is like the ICC - a bunch of people who think real-life should be like Star Trek, with one benevolent organisation running everything.
To: paudio
Cripes, they'll never stop trying to squeeze money out of us.
To: paudio; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
4 posted on
11/24/2004 5:21:24 AM PST by
OXENinFLA
To: paudio
6 posted on
11/24/2004 5:25:40 AM PST by
OXENinFLA
To: paudio
7 posted on
11/24/2004 5:26:57 AM PST by
raybbr
To: paudio
i hope LOST gets lost in senate.
8 posted on
11/24/2004 5:27:23 AM PST by
Haro_546
(Christian Zionist)
To: paudio
9 posted on
11/24/2004 5:29:09 AM PST by
Eva
To: Willie Green; ninenot; A. Pole
10 posted on
11/24/2004 5:33:38 AM PST by
raybbr
To: paudio
The current slogan being echoed by Treaty supporters [is] that we need to have a seat at the table to influence developments; somehow supporters ignore the math of one seat among approximately 150 seats, the power of the one nation/one vote principle and the overwhelmingly anti-American agenda of at least 120 of the 150 seats that we are going to be sitting with.Sigh.
11 posted on
11/24/2004 5:37:42 AM PST by
raybbr
To: paudio; farmfriend
12 posted on
11/24/2004 5:58:53 AM PST by
Issaquahking
( Bush won, Arafat is dead! Life is good!)
To: paudio
From what I've heard, LOST is a non-starter in congress. It's been bottled up in committee for years because the supporters of it have known it doesn't stand a terrorists chance in Iraq of being approved. I need to look into where the congresscritters and the executive stand on this, but it may well be a good thing that it is coming up for a vote. If it
fails in the senate, it is a Dead Parrot. As long as it is still out there, and having not been voted on, it's proponents can still push for it, and it's principles. It could sit in committee until a congress more favorable to its passage comes along. (The globalists have been waiting for this to happen for quite some time now). Once it is actually killed, it is dead.
We need to make sure that it does, indeed come up for a vote, and is voted down decisively. Having the treaty remain in limbo is not in our best interests.
18 posted on
11/24/2004 9:14:20 AM PST by
zeugma
(Come to the Dark Side...... We have cookies!)
To: paudio; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; adam_az; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
19 posted on
11/24/2004 7:01:40 PM PST by
farmfriend
( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
To: paudio
we also will have granted the ISA the right to regulate our transfers of military technology, even the right to determine in what situations our Navy can stop a vessel.It would be a liberal's wet dream for the U.S. to have to kowtow to an unelected body of appointees from banana republics run by tin pot dictators every time they felt the need to stop a boat full of illegals trying to sneak in to the country.
21 posted on
11/24/2004 8:16:40 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: paudio
U.S. Senate = TRAITORS!!!
24 posted on
11/24/2004 11:57:31 PM PST by
Robert Drobot
(God, family, country. All else is meaningless.)
To: paudio
They keep pushing and pushing these treatys and eventually one will slip through. I recall sending an email back in the spring to stop ratification. The proposal stalled in Senate recess, but likely will be revived for debate.
We have to keep up the pressure against LOST and Kyoto to protect our sovergnity!!!! Thanks for the update!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson