Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Dollar has sunk to record lows against Euro
http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=3759014 ^ | me

Posted on 11/27/2004 10:24:13 AM PST by soccer_linux_mozilla

The United States’ trade deficit is soaring and the once high-flying dollar has sunk to record lows against Europe’s common currency.

The dollar’s record low against the euro coincided with the government’s report that the United States was running a trade deficit through September at annual rate of 592 billion dollars. That compares with last year’s record 496 dollars billion. As a result, the country is having to borrow almost 600 billion dollars from overseas this year to pay for the imported cars, televisions and other items Americans are buying.



TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: currency; deficit; dollar; euro; federalreserve; trade; tradedeficit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 481 next last
To: Southack
Plus, more Americans own their own homes

I agree with you for the most part, but I wouldn't say paying the bank back each month for a huge mortgage is exactly "owning" a home.

181 posted on 11/27/2004 6:35:46 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
Well I have not been to Europe in a long long time, so I do not know, first hand, what the standards of living is over there. I do know that things are quite a bit diferent. Streets are much smaller due to the fact that they were built hundreds of years ago. That means cars have to be built smaller too. Homes are smaller too for pretty much the same reason. Really good beer is cheap. What I am getting at is alot of the diference is cultural. Take someone living in NYC, they have to pay a fortune for a small rat trap appartment are they poor? Botton line, Europeans have TVs, homes, cars and computers just like we do. Our life style (culture) might be more fun that stoogy old Europe but that doesn't translate into a big diference in the standard of living.

Maybe I just live in a poor area, but I see people hurting badly around here, no jobs, no money, no hope, lots of young people turn to gangs, durgs and prostitution, this is not the America I remember and it is not the America I grew up in. And I live in a sleepy little Texas town, not the inner city.

182 posted on 11/27/2004 6:50:07 PM PST by jpsb (Ex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

you make some good points. "sleepy towns", as you say, used to rely on basic industries and manufacturing to provide their jobs base. but with the shift of those offshore, service jobs are what's left. but its hard to have any kind of service economy in a location that has no jobs base to begin with, employing people who then have disposable income to spend on services, which provide employment for some of their fellow citizens.


183 posted on 11/27/2004 7:00:35 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Dec31,1999
"It's true. No doubt Southack doesn't have to compete with SLAVE labor"

We all have to compete with slave labor. There is no getting around it. What is slave labor but the opportunity for starving people to make a wage? And BTW, they are only slaves if they don't have a choice. Their other option may be to live off the jungle. If you think we can exist in isolation you have blinders on.

184 posted on 11/27/2004 7:08:49 PM PST by groanup (Rats are afraid of the light so spread a little sunshine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
"Yea, and let's not forget the Smith family from Texas City that loses their home when the bank calls in the mortage to cover the loses it took on the falling dollar."

What????

Are you saying the Smith family was short the Euro? LOL! What has their mortgage to do with this?

185 posted on 11/27/2004 7:11:59 PM PST by groanup (Rats are afraid of the light so spread a little sunshine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Yup Oh Smith shorted the Euro, what a dumb butt.

No silly, a falling dollar will ingenite inflation and higher interest rates. If the banks start lossing to much money on fixed rate mortages they will call them in. Then lot's of folks will lose their homes.

186 posted on 11/27/2004 7:18:39 PM PST by jpsb (Ex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
" My logic says they think: Bush's strong $ policy means the $ ought to stop falling by now but he's ineffectual in stopping it."

You have to understand that there is nothing a president can do. I trade currency futures. The one thing that is a slam dunk is when a central bank enters the market to support a currency. (Central banks have all the money, remember.) That currency would rally briefly and if you take the short in that rally you will make money. The currency markets are bigger than all the central banks in the world and will flow with the trend better than any other commodity. You can't stop it.

The US stock market is billions, the US bond market is trillions, the currency markets are priceless and infinite. You cannot stop a currency trend with rhetoric or intervention or policy initiative. Bet on it!

187 posted on 11/27/2004 7:19:49 PM PST by groanup (Rats are afraid of the light so spread a little sunshine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

The Moneterists and the Austrians (and probably the Supply-siders) would agree that money should serve 3 purposes:

1. a unit of account
2. a store of value
3. a medium of exchange

The Keynesians acknowledge that the store of value function is something that governments should be free to manipulate for various purposes.

What we have going here is a fundamental shift in the demand for dollars (weakening) and a continued increase in the supply of dollars. Unchecked, this could be a bumpy ride.


188 posted on 11/27/2004 7:20:10 PM PST by OwenKellogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
" How far down do you think the dollar needs to go before we see some solid movement on the trade imbalance?"

Excellent question. Remember we are the richest nation in the world. We have most of the world's money and most of the demand for the world's goods. At some point international products are supposed to be too expensive for us to buy. So how much money do we have? Are you going to NOT buy that Japanese gizmo for Christmas because it costs 30% more this year? Hell, you didn't know how much it cost last year. You'll buy it.

189 posted on 11/27/2004 7:25:00 PM PST by groanup (Rats are afraid of the light so spread a little sunshine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama
Somehow, looking back earlier than the last 30 years seems like a lot of work for a Saturday, but if you google the fed, St. Louis maybe you can find something. I do have a chart that shows the dow with the consumer price index going back to 1789, but once again it's hard to relate all that to the present day.

I was asking in a rhetorical way. I figured you already knew what happened in 1973. Basically the dollar was devalued, which is the primary reason we had all that inflation in the 1970's. Thanks for the chart. I like those long term charts and they can be hard to find.

I mentioned the CRB index because it seems particularly sensitive to changes in the value of the dollar, or rather it reflects inflationary or deflationary pressure in the short run and is a very good indicator of the value of the dollar in the long run. There is no way to get an exact value of a currency, just good rules of thumb and I think the CRB is the best, though the CPI is pretty good too. The Forex is awful because currencies are routinely manipulated by governments or packs of currency speculators. Here's a chart of the CRB.

There's no way in heck the dollar is overvalued when one goes back more than 30 years. Clinton's problem is he took the dollar too far, too fast. (Reagan had the same problem in the early 1980's, though it was due more to his excellent policies than manipulation.) Now GWB is taking the dollar too far, too fast in the other direction. It amounts to robbing Peter to pay Paul in a zero sum game. The only real economic growth comes from innovation and investment, not manipulating currencies. There are more important things to worry about than trade balances, like a Republican led government whose tentacles keep getting longer and more intrusive in our economy.

In case the chart doesn't display here is a link.

http://www.sharelynx.com/chartsfixed/rCRBFUTURES.gif

190 posted on 11/27/2004 7:26:20 PM PST by Moonman62 (Federal Creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
"No silly, a falling dollar will ingenite inflation and higher interest rates. If the banks start lossing to much money on fixed rate mortages they will call them in. Then lot's of folks will lose their homes."

Okay, silly. The dollar has been falling for ten years. Interest rates have too. Explain.

191 posted on 11/27/2004 7:28:16 PM PST by groanup (Rats are afraid of the light so spread a little sunshine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: soccer_linux_mozilla

Bookmark


192 posted on 11/27/2004 7:31:13 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld
"If your desire is to see the average American at the same standard of living as the average person in China, you make an excellent argument."

Don't make that mistake. It isn't about Americans and Chinese having the same standard of living. That sort of thinking died in 1929.

It's the foreign exchange value of the Dollar multiplied by average American *Productivity* that gives you your standard of living.

The only way that the Chinese could match our standard of living is by being as productive. Simply changing the values of our currencies won't accomplish that feat.

So try to be modern. Remember that it is Productivity as well as your currency value that counts, not merely your currency.

Say it again, come on, you can learn this too: Productivity.

When you are talking about standards of living, Productivity counts. If you can't remember to factor in Productivity, then you are out of your depth in this discussion.

193 posted on 11/27/2004 7:31:13 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: OwenKellogg
What we have going here is a fundamental shift in the demand for dollars (weakening) and a continued increase in the supply of dollars. Unchecked, this could be a bumpy ride.

What we have here is a hard headed, Ivy League educated president who believes the economy is a zero-sum game that should be dominated by the government. There is no question that he is manipulating the dollar downward.

I do admit that there are Supply-Siders who have gold fever, but I am not one of them. Commodity money just adds another layer of inefficiency to an economy. In the case of the Bretton Woods system, it provided the perfect playground for government corruption and manipulation.

194 posted on 11/27/2004 7:32:29 PM PST by Moonman62 (Federal Creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
"The democrats with high IQs are making a hard right turn on issues that should belong to the GOP. Issues like immigration, spending, out-soucing, free trade. If the democrats are to the right of the GOP on these issues I might even vote democrat for the first time in my life. If I vote democrat then the Democrats will win bigger then anyone has ever won before. It will be a 94 on spheroids."

You should consider a career in fiction writing because that's pure fantasyland thinking. Enjoy your delusions for yourself, but sharing that sort of nonsense must surely be embarassing.

195 posted on 11/27/2004 7:34:35 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: jpsb; Toddsterpatriot; LowCountryJoe; Poohbah
If the banks start lossing [sic] to much money on fixed rate mortages they will call them in.

A callable home mortgage? LOL. I wonder what the interest rate would be on one of those?

196 posted on 11/27/2004 7:35:39 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Southack
" Say it again, come on, you can learn this too: Productivity."

Nothing has skyrocketed globally more than productivity. Are you just antagonistic or ignorant? Do you think for one minute that the Chinese haven't copied our productivity standards? You should go to bed. There is nothing more exponential at this point in time than the growth of productivity. How this relates to "your currency" is beyond me.

197 posted on 11/27/2004 7:37:00 PM PST by groanup (Rats are afraid of the light so spread a little sunshine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

Let's see were spending $80 billion a year to steal $30 billion of oil. Who the hell makes these decisions?


198 posted on 11/27/2004 7:41:31 PM PST by eternity (From here to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dec31,1999
"It's true. No doubt Southack doesn't have to compete with SLAVE labor. He's got his, so the rest of you can just sod off."

Making money is easy. Most people simply don't want to truly risk their own wealth on such pursuits (the majority prefers to consume rather than invest the majority of their income, for instance). And that's all fine and well, as even *investing* is a bad idea if you don't understand the basics of economics (especially as demonstrated in a fair part of this thread).

For instance, Chinese "slave" labor, after shipping, Import/Export red tape, various taxes, and other such costs, when factored in with Chinese Productivity amounts to a savings of less than half of the highest American wages. The existing devaluation of the Dollar by 30% in the last two years, once the Yuan finally follows, will reduce that labor cost benefit down to a mere 20%.

For that 20% savings, you get Chinese quality (ick, choke, gasp) and a time delay based upon the length of transit shipping/recieving/inspecting times.

Should the Dollar devalue even further, then even that meager 20% labor "savings" will disappear.

Consider this: would you pay *MORE* for a Chinese car today than for a Japanese, German, or American vehicle of the similar class? What do you think will happen to Chinese imports by Americans as the Yuan catches up to the change in the Dollar? Will Americans buy more or less of those newly increased-in-price goods?

199 posted on 11/27/2004 7:43:01 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Well the dollar has not been falling for ten years. So there goes that theory, and interest rates are going up and inflation and inflation is too, so guess I am right about that.

The fed sets interest rates, and if you recall the feds set rates at near zero to help the economy set over the dot com bust. Also recall that the federal budget was in balance at the time so there was no need to borrow which allowed the feds to drop rates. Now the situtation is very diferent, the feds will have to raise interest rates to attract buyers to a falling dollar. Higher interest rates means higher inflation, a falling dollar also means higher inflation due to increased cost of imports.

The US ecomony is going to take a double hit, higher interest rates and higher cost of imports both due to a falling dollar.

200 posted on 11/27/2004 7:43:17 PM PST by jpsb (Ex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 481 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson