[nonliberal]

Okay. Abstinence based education is both impractical and unconstitutional. It surprises me that some Freepers who are so opposed to a federal role in education would favor meddling such as this.

Either you are for a federal role in education or you are not. If not, wouldn't it be ideologically consistent to oppose abstinence based funding as government interference?

[churchillbuff]

Abstinence based education is both impractical and unconstitutional."""

Federal aid to education is unconstitutional. But once it has started - and once federal aid for sex ed is an established fact - I want that aid to tell kids the truth, that the only sure way to stay non-pregnant is to abstain. All the other ways are risky.