Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Bush Signs Landmark Legislation Prohibiting Forced Psychiatric Drugging of Schoolchildren
Citizens Commission on Human Rights (Scientology front) ^ | December 6, 2004

Posted on 12/06/2004 1:02:52 PM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative

Celebrities, Parents, Legislators and Civil Rights Groups Win Victory for Children's Rights with Passage of the "Prohibition on Mandatory Medication Amendment"

Los Angeles - Celebrities Lisa Marie Presley, Kelly Preston, Kirstie Alley, Jenna Elfman and Juliette Lewis joined the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR), a mental health watchdog established by the Church of Scientology, in applauding Congress for passing precedent-setting legislation that bans school personnel forcing parents to drug their children for classroom or behavioral problems. In order to receive federal funds under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA), the "Prohibition on Mandatory Medication Amendment," was signed into law by President Bush today and requires schools to implement policies that prohibit schoolchildren being forced onto psychiatric drugs as a requisite for their education.

Hundreds of parents across America have been pressured to put their school-aged children onto cocaine-like stimulants or antidepressants for which the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has just ordered a "black box label" warning of the drugs' high risk of causing suicide among children and adolescents. Ms. Kelly Preston, who met with members of Congress in June last year to enlist support of the amendment, said, "Every mother has an inherent right to protect her child from harm. However, many mothers have been denied that right because psychiatrists have inundated unwitting teachers with the false opinion that educational and behavioral problems are symptoms of 'mental disorders' that require mind-altering drugs. This law gives hope for a new era in education, one where teachers are free to work with parents to find academic solutions instead of unworkable and harmful psychiatric treatments that benefit no one but the psychiatric industry."

Many groups supported the amendment, including the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the National Foundation of Women Legislators (NFWL), Parents for a Label and Drug Free Education, as well as numerous state and federal legislators.

Bruce Wiseman, the U.S. President of CCHR says, "Psychiatrists did not want to let go of their stronghold of American schools and launched massive counter efforts to kill this legislation. However, people are waking up to the fact that psychiatric 'mental disorders' have absolutely no scientific/medical validity and that psychiatrists falsely portray them as a disease or physical condition to convince teachers and parents that these are medical issues, which is a complete fraud. Psychiatric 'disorders' are simply checklists of behaviors‹symptoms presumed to be related‹and voted by members of the American Psychiatric Association to be included in their insurance billing bible, the Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. This has been used to justify the administration of dangerous drugs to more than 8 million children. Parents and teachers were never informed about documented side effects of many of these drugs, including suicide, violence, mania and psychosis."

CCHR says the next step in educational reform is to remove psychiatric and psychological testing and screening from schools which are the feeder lines to psychiatrists who have made turning schools into mental health clinics a business. Millions of students are now dependent upon psychiatric drugs or are taking them illegally. CCHR, joined by scores of parents and civil rights groups, say the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health's recommendations for mandatory mental health screening in school is a frightening representation of Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, in which Huxley describes a controlled "utopian" civilization achieved with the "technique of suggestion‹through infant conditioning and, later, with the aid of drugs." While the "Prohibition on Mandatory Medication Amendment" will help prevent some of psychiatry's propensity to drug all normal childhood behavior, many charge that the spurious sounding "Freedom Commission on Mental Health" and its recommendations will open another door to dangerous conditioning leading to massive increases in psychotropic drugging of a new generation.

Dr. Julian Whitaker, director of California's Whitaker Wellness Center warns that the motive behind mandatory mental health screening of children is obvious: "That means drugging them!" For psychiatry, this means, "52 million potential customers." He offers this advice to parents: "First of all, refuse to sign those consent forms when they come home from your child's school‹if they can't test them, they can't drug them."

CCHR will monitor the implementation of this law so that any parent who may still experience coercion to drug their child can contact CCHR to report this and for assistance.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: bush43; cult; education; idea; mentalhealth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
While the news is welcome, I wonder why this reform was a special project of the Church of Scientology...
1 posted on 12/06/2004 1:02:53 PM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

i agree and had the same reaction. what's in it for them?


3 posted on 12/06/2004 1:04:53 PM PST by kallisti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

The article's title is misleading. Children cannot be forced to take psychotropic medications with parental consent or a court order.


4 posted on 12/06/2004 1:05:09 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

"applauding Congress for passing precedent-setting legislation that bans school personnel forcing parents to drug their children for classroom or behavioral problems."

The fact that such a law was needed is frightening.


5 posted on 12/06/2004 1:05:20 PM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

...strange bedfellows, eh?

I actually like to see odd groups find commonalities- gets people otherwise unwilling to listen to one another talking..I think this is great!


6 posted on 12/06/2004 1:05:39 PM PST by SE Mom (God Bless our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
...I wonder why this reform was a special project of the Church of Scientology... The only reason Scientology has not progressed to it's natural conclusion; i.e. handing out the grape kool-aid in Guyana, or a stand off with BATF; is that there is lots of money to be made peddling the mad rantings of L. Ron Hubbard.
7 posted on 12/06/2004 1:06:59 PM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
...I wonder why this reform was a special project of the Church of Scientology...

The only reason Scientology has not progressed to it's natural conclusion; i.e. handing out the grape kool-aid in Guyana, or a stand off with BATF; is that there is lots of money to be made peddling the mad rantings of L. Ron Hubbard.

8 posted on 12/06/2004 1:07:15 PM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

bump


9 posted on 12/06/2004 1:07:37 PM PST by blackeagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

Yeah! Who the hell issued MEDICAL LIcences to teachers who can't even TEACH our children let alone give them medical diagnosis!!!


10 posted on 12/06/2004 1:07:54 PM PST by funkywbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

Hopefully the next law will require schools to implement policies that prohibit schoolchildren being forced to learn/hear Liberal ideas as a requisite for their education.


11 posted on 12/06/2004 1:11:37 PM PST by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

Aren't the scientologists the ones who'll let their folks die rather than permit medical intervention?


12 posted on 12/06/2004 1:12:08 PM PST by Wneighbor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

The fact that Scientologists think it is a bad thing is almost enough to send me running to the pediatrician to get some 'scrips for my daughter.


13 posted on 12/06/2004 1:12:15 PM PST by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
I didn't see anything in the article about Bush signing the legislation. I hope he does.

I know very little about the "church" of scientology, but I suspect they are opposed to the use of psychotropic drugs as a solution to anyone's problems.

14 posted on 12/06/2004 1:13:40 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

Think in terms of "even a stopped clock is right twice a day."


15 posted on 12/06/2004 1:14:30 PM PST by stylin_geek (Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

I wonder how persuasive school officials are with weak-willed or ignorant parents in getting their consent to dope-up their kids.


16 posted on 12/06/2004 1:14:50 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Even though this comes from this group....I've listened to the followers of this sect on this and they are very well informed...I'm glad they went after this legislation on a big time bases....keeps us Christian conservatives from having to fight another battle. We've got enough to fight as it is.
17 posted on 12/06/2004 1:15:43 PM PST by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Wneighbor

That would be "Christian Science."


18 posted on 12/06/2004 1:16:13 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

No one's allowed to compete with the Church of Scienfictionology!


19 posted on 12/06/2004 1:17:37 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARridgerunner

ping


20 posted on 12/06/2004 1:18:02 PM PST by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson