It is definitely against the odds to be able to pull that off. And the jury jumping in the boat while it is on the trailer - not in the water - then coming to a verdict after announcing they were deadlocked. And what about the two jurors that were thrown off? Was the first one to go a hold out? The second one leaning towards guilty and tossed from the jury to event the score like a referee making a second bad call to make up for an earlier bad call?
exatly my point. The two juros kicked off--Guess what? They were leaning towards Not Guilty verdict...I Guess that was just a coincedence?
The jury never announced they were deadlocked.
And what about the two jurors that were thrown off? Was the first one to go a hold out?
No, he was refusing to deliberate; you do know how juries work, don't you? All 12 people HAVE to deliberate; he had taken 19 notebooks of personal notes and wanted to go through them line by line; the other jurors had their OWN notes and didn't feel the need to go through five months of notes.
The second one leaning towards guilty and tossed from the jury to event the score like a referee making a second bad call to make up for an earlier bad call?
She was removed for MISCONDUCT, i.e., investigating the case on her own, which she ADMITTED; now, do you think the judge MADE her do that?