I hate the idea of an organization such as Catholics for a Free Choice
Ya you have a free choice, go become an Unitarian and leave the Church alone.
What ever this article says, she is already responsible for the murder of countless babies through her actions. May God have mercy on her soul.
Bump. It's amazing to watch the contortions these people put themselves through to continue defending what they know is wrong.
It's kind of a shame her parents didn't have the same feelings about abortion when her mother got pregnant with her. What a waste of skin and $3 worth of chemicals.
I posted Kissling's article here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1295713/posts
I see Kissling's stand as evidence of some inroads made by pro-Life over the last decade or so. Although she and her organization would never change course 180 degrees, we can see them at least lilting to the right slightly. It's an interesting read considering the source.
Of course pro-Abortion people are going to have coniption fits at the mere suggestion that the fetus "may" have some value and that the discussion should at least advance .... most are absolutists.
I posted Kissling's article here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1295713/posts
I see Kissling's stand as evidence of some inroads made by pro-Life over the last decade or so. Although she and her organization would never change course 180 degrees, we can see them at least lilting to the right slightly. It's an interesting read considering the source.
Of course pro-Abortion people are going to have coniption fits at the mere suggestion that the fetus "may" have some value and that the discussion should at least advance .... most are absolutists.
But she's negotiating - she's willing to give up drinking the blood of children over 20 weeks in exchange for guarantees that she can kill 19 week olds.
We have to keep fighting these devils.
Evil.
There's just no other word for it.
How anyone could look at that image of a beating heart and want to stop it is simply incomprehensible evil to me.
They are on the table.
Oh, here we go again, the same old tired canard that "pro-life" people "don't care about babies after they're born." Even if this accusation were valid (which it isn't) how does that justify "therefore it's OK to kill them"?
All this proves is that pro-aborts mouth these sound bites without having the faintest idea of what they're actually saying.
"...the dying and suffering of women who don't have access to safe abortion..." is a myth. The only way pro-abortion monsters can try to justify an abominable horror is to equate it in their minds to the preservation of the life of the mother. In the overwhelming majority of abortion cases, this is just. not. true. Abortion is used, by and large, as a gruesome method of birth control for those too ignorant, careless or wanton in their personal lives. It is a despicable attempt to abdicate responsibility for their sexual practices.
Actually, it should be required by state law, for abortions at a stage where the fetus is capable of feeling pain. State laws do not allow inhumane methods of euthanizing unwanted or sick animals.
That's because you are killing a person, Frances.
Again, it boils down to them thinking "It's not what we say, it's how we say it. If we say it differently, we'll win more people over."
Thanks to FemiNazis, the unborn child has literally no protection in the womb, and is considered fair game by any and all saline/suction-wielding abortionists.
The USSC decision specfically states that under the equal protection clause of 14th Amendment, the unborn child is not considered a "person" and therefore has no legal rights under US law (14th Excerpt: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof......").
Roe v Wade author Justice Harry Blackmun wrote that "the unborn have never been recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense" and are not entitled to constitutional protection until birth.
Here, Blackmun was aided by tenets of the Jewish faith, and possibly other faiths, who teach that life begins at birth, not in the womb.
However, the official right-to-life position is that life begins at conception. Pro aborts insist that laws built on those religious beliefs infringe on their constitutional right of freedom from religion, yet they rarely if ever mention that the concept of life beginning at birth is a religious belief.
FemiNazis made sure that Roe v Wade made the "Right to Choose" paramount. The mother's rights over the womb are absolute.....up to and including the ninth month of pregnancy. Most people believe that the court decision was based on the viability of unborn life, and that the court examined all of the existing information, then decided there was no viability. Nothing could be further from the truth.
I have had to force newspaper editors to retract editiorials on this aspect of the USSC decision.
The court based its decision on the fact that since religion and science could not decide (up to that time) when life begins, they didn't have to, either.
Blackmun wrote: "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. When those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer."
It appears the Roe Court (or some of them) actually believed that it wasn't possible to determine when the life of a human being begins. But, by not resolving this factual issue, the Court left unresolved the legal question regarding the rights of an unborn child. So, the need to provide an answer to that question is inescapable.
Cutting edge millenium technology offers proof positive that life begins at conception. The issue of when life begins is no longer a difficult question. Scientific and medical evidence proves, without doubt, that human life begins at the moment of conception and that the child is a complete, separate, unique and irreplaceable human being from the moment of conception throughout gestation.
Since 1973, advances in technology have allowed us to obtain new information about human life on a molecular level. This information resolves all doubts that abortion is the act of killing a human being and that this tiny human experiences pain even during early gestation.
At the time of the Roe v Wade decision, abortion was completely illegal in 33 states except when necessary to save the life of the mother. The remaining 17 states allowed abortion in various circumstances. The most permissive, New York, allowed abortion for any reason up to 24 weeks, though New York did not allow third trimester abortions for "emotional health" as required by the Supreme Court.
In recent years, the abortion right has been extended to partial-birth abortions (sometimes termed infanticide) so that a perfectly viable child in the birth canal, in the process of being born, can be aborted in a most gruesome way, if the mother so chooses.
Well, that or maybe there wasn't a clinic around the corner from their house, or maybe they had something else to do on Saturday afternoon. I mean, who are we to judge?