Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CHARLITE

The UN still serves a purpose. I'd rather have the ambassadors come to the UN and air their grevences while we ignore them, than having them get together behind closed doors and come out with big smiles. The UN has never really had any power. It is just a stage for the rest of the world to pretend they are important. Some times WE need that so THEY don't start focusing their attention to important matters...like what WE are doing.


16 posted on 12/08/2004 9:15:18 PM PST by Once-Ler ("He lives in Madison, WI. No wonder he thinks Bush is a conservative!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Once-Ler

Your right I would rather have them out in the open where we can exercise the veto than having France, Germany, Russia and China having comlete control over it. I think it's time that all member states pull their fair share of the load, The United States should not have to burden the taxpayers with more than a reasonable share. If we supply the food and the equipment to deliver it then it should be paid for out of the UN coffers.


18 posted on 12/08/2004 10:17:44 PM PST by snowman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson